Why did Austria want to merge with Germany?
- hauptmannn
- Member
- Posts: 1103
- Joined: 12 Jul 2003, 15:15
- Location: France
Why did Austria want to merge with Germany?
I've been wondering as to why Austria initially after ww1 wanted to merge with Germany? And why the Western powers did not want Austria to merge with Germany?
Pan-German Nationalism had long been one of the more important movements, both cultural and political, in the German-speaking part of Austro-Hungarian Monarchy. It was not a phenomenon appeared after WWI, although it indeed gained more traction after the Great War for multiple reasons, one of them was the doubt as to the viability of a small Austria as a European power. The great leader and first national organizer of this movement, Georg von Schönerer (1842-1921), was most active before the War. It was a movement originated in student movements and most popular in German-speaking middle class and intellectuals (Dr. Sigmund Freud was an ardent follower of the movement when he was a young student! 8) ).
Gordon Shepherd's The Austrian Odyssey, London, 1957, has some excellent analyses of this unique Austrian psyche. For Pan-German Nationalism as a political movement before the Great War in Vienna, read Carl Schorske's essay Politics in a New Key: An Austrian Trio, in Fin-de-Siecle Vienna: Politics and Culture, New York, 1980.
Best Regards!
Gordon Shepherd's The Austrian Odyssey, London, 1957, has some excellent analyses of this unique Austrian psyche. For Pan-German Nationalism as a political movement before the Great War in Vienna, read Carl Schorske's essay Politics in a New Key: An Austrian Trio, in Fin-de-Siecle Vienna: Politics and Culture, New York, 1980.
Best Regards!
true, the most important reason was that after ww1 the habsburg empire broke up into its former nationalities. all nationalities formed their states (Czechs and slowaks, hungarians) or joined their mother-states (like the polish, the romanians, the ukrainians, the italians), those who were left were the german speaking in todays austria (who had never before belonged to a german empire, but vice versa germany had been part of the "austrian" habsburg empire).
They had been used to living in europe´s second largest monarchy. they could not trust in living in such a small nation left.(6,5 millions) Even the revolutionaries wanted to join their comrades in germany.
after ww2 it was just the other way around. ..
They had been used to living in europe´s second largest monarchy. they could not trust in living in such a small nation left.(6,5 millions) Even the revolutionaries wanted to join their comrades in germany.
after ww2 it was just the other way around. ..
- hauptmannn
- Member
- Posts: 1103
- Joined: 12 Jul 2003, 15:15
- Location: France
-
- Member
- Posts: 2840
- Joined: 10 Mar 2002, 23:46
- Location: United Kingdom
No, a clash of ideologies. My reference to Tehran (’43) was to point out the start of this struggle and Austria being quite important geopolitically, the ‘allies’ basically nipped the dilemma in the bud by neutralizing Her. Also, there is small matter regarding the amputation of ancient Austrian lands in pursuit of the same goal and possibly to reward/chastise certain other countries.
After WW1,Germany was lead by a social-demacratic government.And in the chaos of the breaking Austrian-Hungarian Monarchy,the Austrian socialdemocrates also wanted Austria to be lead by a socialdemocratic government.So they wanted to merge with germany. An anti patriotic behavoir,which those circles had to pay under the dictatorship of Dr. Engelbert Dollfuß in the early 30's.
The Allies feared a powerful germany after the war,and did everything that could garanty this.In the contract of St.Germain,Austria was not allowed to join Germany.
The Allies feared a powerful germany after the war,and did everything that could garanty this.In the contract of St.Germain,Austria was not allowed to join Germany.
For those members who do not read German, here are two more English language books bearing on this topic:
Bukey, Evan Burr. Hitler’s Austria: Popular Sentiment in the Nazi Era 1938-1945, Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, 2000
Pauley, Bruce F. Hitler and the Forgotten Nazis: A History of Austrian National Socialism, Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, 1987
The Pauley book is particularly well researched and written. As to the Bukey book, although some what dry, it offers a more balanced view than the Austrophil Gordon Shepherd does in his book I recommended in my previous post.
Although there is a really good biography of Karl Lueger in English (Geehr, Richard S. Karl Lueger: Mayor of Fin de Siècle Vienna, Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1990), I am not aware of a comparable one for Georg Ritter von Shönerer, I would appreciate it very much if anyone can recommend one.
Best Regards!
Bukey, Evan Burr. Hitler’s Austria: Popular Sentiment in the Nazi Era 1938-1945, Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, 2000
Pauley, Bruce F. Hitler and the Forgotten Nazis: A History of Austrian National Socialism, Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, 1987
The Pauley book is particularly well researched and written. As to the Bukey book, although some what dry, it offers a more balanced view than the Austrophil Gordon Shepherd does in his book I recommended in my previous post.
Although there is a really good biography of Karl Lueger in English (Geehr, Richard S. Karl Lueger: Mayor of Fin de Siècle Vienna, Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1990), I am not aware of a comparable one for Georg Ritter von Shönerer, I would appreciate it very much if anyone can recommend one.
Best Regards!