The Austro-Hungarian army VS The Russian army in WW1

Discussions on all aspects of Austria-Hungary. Hosted by Glenn Jewison.
Post Reply
User avatar
G.U.Y
Member
Posts: 12
Joined: 24 Aug 2005, 06:43
Location: Victoria, BC

The Austro-Hungarian army VS The Russian army in WW1

#1

Post by G.U.Y » 27 Aug 2005, 07:03

The Austro-Hungarian army VS The Russian army in WW1.

Hello, I am interested to hear all of your opinions on which was the better army. Personally, even though my Great-grandfather was a solider of the KuK, I believe that the Russian army was superior compared to the Austro-Hungarian. The KuK only won in Galicia thanks to German assistance (my view).

GRAN CAPITAN
Member
Posts: 112
Joined: 28 Dec 2004, 13:47
Location: SPAIN

#2

Post by GRAN CAPITAN » 09 Sep 2005, 17:46

Difficult question. I believe that in 1914, AH army had better equipment and organization than Russian imperial army. The main problem was the suspected reliability of some slav units, a problem which worsened with time and eventually triggered the final collapse of AH. Neverthelesss, AH army (with German support) fought decently and with some succes for many years both in the eastern and alpine fronts.
On the other hand, the Russian army started the war with very poor supply and leadership. After a few bloody defeats, the Russians recovered a little bit and even managed to launch a rather succesful offensive (Brusilov's offensive), but at the end of the day, they were not able to overcome their cronical shortages of weapons and ammunition. The best tribute to this army is the fact that despite horrible losses they were able to hold in line up to the start of soviet revolution.


glenn239
Member
Posts: 5868
Joined: 29 Apr 2005, 02:20
Location: Ontario, Canada

#3

Post by glenn239 » 15 Oct 2005, 16:41

I'd suggest a numerical hierarchy for the value of an individual soldier in the three armies, 1914-1916. Something along the lines of:

German: 5
Russian: 3
Austrian: 2

Calogerizmus
Member
Posts: 10
Joined: 26 Mar 2007, 16:00
Location: European Union

Re: The Austro-Hungarian army VS The Russian army in WW1

#4

Post by Calogerizmus » 26 Mar 2007, 16:14

G.U.Y wrote: The KuK only won in Galicia thanks to German assistance (my view).
This is wrong, in my opinion.
The KuK won *also* but not *only* thanks to German assistance.
At Gorlice-Tarnòw, the true turning point of the early war on the Eastern Front, the 65% of the men of the three armies involved were from KuK and there was four Austrian divisions also in Mackensen's armies (data from the Sondhaus' biography of Conrad). But, of course, it is regarded as a German victory.
The failure of Austro-Hungarian armies in the first months of war was due, in my opinion, to the disastrous leadership and poor planning of Conrad and his staff.

agblume
Member
Posts: 54
Joined: 27 May 2006, 19:56
Location: charlottesville, virginia

Austro-Hungarians on the Russian Front

#5

Post by agblume » 26 Mar 2007, 18:02

I would invite anyone interested in the actions of the Austro-Hungarian forces on the Russian Front during 1914-1917 to visit my website http://www.warchron.com and view the Chronology which has 350 pages and about 750 images as hyperlinks. There is an Index and Search function which can aid your research. Best regards, agblume

Post Reply

Return to “Austria-Hungary 1867–1918”