What was the Nazi's reaction to the attack on Pearl Harbor?

Discussions on WW2 in the Pacific and the Sino-Japanese War.
Post Reply
User avatar
Matthew
Member
Posts: 453
Joined: 02 Nov 2002, 01:37
Location: United States

What was the Nazi's reaction to the attack on Pearl Harbor?

#1

Post by Matthew » 23 Nov 2002, 10:45

Does anyone know what the Nazi's reaction was to the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor? Did they fully believe Japan could defeat the US because of the suprise attack?

User avatar
GFM2000
Member
Posts: 303
Joined: 13 Mar 2002, 09:27

#2

Post by GFM2000 » 24 Nov 2002, 13:39

According to Shirer, Hitler was amazed by this Machievallian act by the Japanese, and and ordered Ribbentrop to openly declare war on the Americans as soon as possible.

I'm not sure if they knew for sure if the Germans knew what Japan's "grand strategy" for the "Greater East Asia Co-operative Sphere" actually was, not to mention whether the Japanese were able to defeat America*. My guess is the Germans did not give it too much thought, since the German Army was already facing trouble outside Moscow, and could only hope that Japan's sense of honour would push the Japanese into declaring war on Russia.

:D

* Come to think of it, it seems as if the Japanese themselves do not know how they are going to accomplish this, but perhaps this can be discussed in a different thread.


varjag
In memoriam
Posts: 4431
Joined: 01 May 2002, 02:44
Location: Australia

#3

Post by varjag » 24 Nov 2002, 14:10

Most contemporary records and subsequent history seems to agree that the German government was as surprised as the sailors,airmen and soldiers at Pearl. The Japanese had sent veiled warnings to Berlin - but their interpretation seems to have been that the strike was going to fall on Britains Eastern Empire - which delighted them. The implications of the PH strike was obvious to Hitler and the German Admirals.Few German generals even knew where Pearl Harbour was. But when Hitler on 11.12. brazenly declared war on the US - every German from private to Field Marshal, I think took notice with what can only mildly be discribed as dismay. My view is - that Hitler, by fulfilling the conditions of the Tri-Partite Agreement - thought that Japan, correspondingly, would declare war on the Soviet Union - and send it's underemployed Kwantung Army to ease the pressure before Moscow. But, perfidious Nippon, choose otherwise - the rest is history.

User avatar
Gareth Collins
Member
Posts: 1493
Joined: 17 Oct 2002, 19:38
Contact:

#4

Post by Gareth Collins » 24 Nov 2002, 17:21

Excellent post varjag. Don't think I could have put it better myself.

User avatar
David C. Clarke
In memoriam
Posts: 11368
Joined: 10 Mar 2002, 18:17
Location: U.S. of A.

#5

Post by David C. Clarke » 24 Nov 2002, 18:10

Well "perfidious Nippon" would have been "stupid Nippon" if they had declared war on the Soviet Union as well as the U.S. at the same time.
Let's remember that there wasn't much in it for Japan. How many thousands of kilometers of empty Siberia would the Japanese Army (already fighting in the quicksand pool of China) have wanted to take?
My humble opinion is that Stalin would have still used his Siberian Troops to fight in european Russia if the Japanese had declared war, knowing that there was literally nothing of strategic value for the Japanese to endanger for thousands of square kilometers in the East.
The Japanese shouldn't bear the blame for Hitler's mistake, which was to plan to conquer Russia in a single year's campaign.
Regards, David

User avatar
red devil
Member
Posts: 629
Joined: 25 Nov 2004, 03:11
Location: Sutton Coldfield England
Contact:

#6

Post by red devil » 10 Dec 2004, 17:41

Shock! Then Germany declared war on the USA about 3 -4 days later

Karl
Member
Posts: 2729
Joined: 12 Mar 2002, 03:55
Location: S. E. Asia

#7

Post by Karl » 18 Dec 2004, 14:49

red devil wrote:Shock! Then Germany declared war on the USA about 3 -4 days later
This was maybe the biggest of a long line of blunders...even without the benefit of hindsight, one would imagine they would not have acted so fast to do this…the US was already an econmoic powerhouse to be reckoned with…maybe more then forty years already and especially after ww1…dumb and too emotional imho...I really don't know what they were thinking.

Jon G.
Member
Posts: 6647
Joined: 17 Feb 2004, 02:12
Location: Europe

#8

Post by Jon G. » 18 Dec 2004, 15:05

Well, the Soviets did have Vladivostok close to Manchuria to worry about, so they couldn't just have abandoned the Far East altogether.

By Dec. 1941 there was more or less a state of undeclared war between the US and Germany in the Atlantic - so you could reasonably argue that war between Germany and the US would have come about anyway, Pearl Harbor or not.

Hitler's simplistic view may simply have been that the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor would mean that the US would be too preoccupied fighting in Asia to interfere much in his European war. At least for a while, he was actually right - had he beaten the USSR in 1942, he would have had the time to concentrate west again, before the US could intervene.

Karl
Member
Posts: 2729
Joined: 12 Mar 2002, 03:55
Location: S. E. Asia

#9

Post by Karl » 18 Dec 2004, 15:22

Shrek wrote:
By Dec. 1941 there was more or less a state of undeclared war between the US and Germany in the Atlantic - so you could reasonably argue that war between Germany and the US would have come about anyway, Pearl Harbor or not.
You think?
Hitler's simplistic view may simply have been that the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor would mean that the US would be too preoccupied fighting in Asia to interfere much in his European war. At least for a while, he was actually right - had he beaten the USSR in 1942, he would have had the time to concentrate west again, before the US could intervene.
He never should have messed with Russia either dangit! :x

Jon G.
Member
Posts: 6647
Joined: 17 Feb 2004, 02:12
Location: Europe

#10

Post by Jon G. » 18 Dec 2004, 15:35

Karl wrote:
Shrek wrote:
By Dec. 1941 there was more or less a state of undeclared war between the US and Germany in the Atlantic - so you could reasonably argue that war between Germany and the US would have come about anyway, Pearl Harbor or not.
You think?
Yes. From September 1941, USN ships in the Atlantic were ordered to shoot on sight at German U-Boats. Of course it goes to Roosevelt's credit that Hitler spared him the trouble of actually declaring war.
He never should have messed with Russia either dangit! :x
Well, the wisdom of taking on the USSR single-handedly while still at war with the UK is another discussion :)

User avatar
Cantankerous
Member
Posts: 1277
Joined: 01 Sep 2019, 22:22
Location: Newport Coast

Re: German reaction to attack on Pearl Harbor

#11

Post by Cantankerous » 23 Apr 2023, 02:39

Jon G. wrote:
18 Dec 2004, 15:05
Well, the Soviets did have Vladivostok close to Manchuria to worry about, so they couldn't just have abandoned the Far East altogether.

By Dec. 1941 there was more or less a state of undeclared war between the US and Germany in the Atlantic - so you could reasonably argue that war between Germany and the US would have come about anyway, Pearl Harbor or not.

Hitler's simplistic view may simply have been that the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor would mean that the US would be too preoccupied fighting in Asia to interfere much in his European war. At least for a while, he was actually right - had he beaten the USSR in 1942, he would have had the time to concentrate west again, before the US could intervene.
From the History Reader website:
Hitler foolishly believed that the Japanese attack on America, and on British possessions in the Far East, would divert Allied military assets from the European Theater, which it may have done to some greater degree, if he had either kept his mouth shut or at least demanded Japan attack the Soviet Union in return for his declaration of war on America. He did neither, but rather was delighted that the unexpected news of the attack would divert unwelcome attention from the running sore that the Eastern Front had become.
Although Joachim von Ribbentrop had done his best to remind Hitler that the Tripartite Pact required Germany or Italy to come to the aid of Japan if a third country attacked Japan, but not if Japan attacked a third country, but Hitler's glee at his belief that the surprise attack on Pearl Harbor would partly divert some attention from Germany's fighting on the Eastern Front informed his decision to have Germany declare war on the US without consulting von Ribbentrop because he had always called the US a decadent society "incapable of waging war" and thought that declaring war on the US would also please U-boat commanders in the North Atlantic considering that US military aircraft and naval vessels were fighting Kriegsmarine vessels and German patrol planes in the North Atlantic in 1940-1941 (Germany's sinking of American merchant ships ferrying aid to the British people flew in the face of the German Foreign Ministry's insistence that Nazi Germany was observing international rules governing neutrality in its relations with the United States during the first two years of World War II).

Post Reply

Return to “WW2 in the Pacific & Asia”