Well, I like disputes with correct arguments.
You know, Rommel fought against Italians in First World War too. His opinion was, that the Italians are bad soldiers, but he didn't write this in his book, the Infantry Attacks, because he publicated this too late (Italy and Germany were allies in this time). He didn't write his candid opinion. It was a generally German deal, they scorned their allies, their all "comrades". This is a fact.
I like Italian people, and I know, that the Italian bersaglieri and paratrooper units were excellent. But the Italian Army's equipment was bad and they didn't want to fight for Hitler in eastern front, and their performance was quite weak in the desert too.
I know, that Hitler liked Antonescu as a politician, but he hated and scorned Romanians too. The Romanians were "third class allies" for him.
This sentence was just a joke:
"BTW The Hungarian soldiers were the best soldiers
Do you know, what does it mean:
BTW the Hungarians equipment was the worst during Second World War. Their problems were the highest, because just Hungary and Bulgaria were defeated and mutilationed countries, like Germany, all other Germany's ally were in better position. Bulgaria's role was not too important. The Hungarian military industry started in late 1938.
What do you think, this is the same, like Romania's position? You must be joking! And Romania got a lot of modern weapons from Germany, but Hungary none, till 1944. The Hungarian Army fought against the Red Army with old and unimpressive weapons. This is a sad fact.
BTW, when the Hungarian Army fought against the Romanians, the Hungarian soldiers were better, than Romanians. This is a fact too 8)
I am not too partial, because I am a half German, and most of my parents were German (Waffen SS) soldiers.
I think, Germany hated all his enemies and allies too. It was a huge mistake, but Hitler was a psychotic person and his opinion is not authoritative.
Sorry for my bad English, but I have been learning English just since February 2001.