Romanian Iron Guard

Discussions on all aspects of the smaller Axis nations in Europe and Asia. Hosted by G. Trifkovic.
Locked
Ezboard

Romanian Iron Guard

#1

Post by Ezboard » 30 Sep 2002, 20:31

Ovidius
Veteran Member

Posts: 1000
(1/2/02 10:28:36 pm)
Reply
Romanian Iron Guard
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen,

I've promised to blow up some myths and prejudices regarding the Romanian Legion of The Archangel Michael aka the Iron Guard.

Background: Jews on the Romanian lands face Romanian Nationalism

The Jewish population in the Eastern Europe had begun, as we all do knowm the Great Migration towards West in the second half of the 19th century, driven out by Russian Anti-Semitism.

Their first stop on the way was the Northeastern Romania(province of Northern Moldavia) where a lot of them, mostly from Russian-occupied Poland and Ukraine, had settled voluntarily.

The situation of the freshly-independent(from 1877) Romania was quite dangerous: Extreme Northern Moldavia(Bukovina) had been occupied by Austria-Hungary, Transylvania had the same status, Bessarabia(Eastern Moldavia) had been occupied in 1812 by the Russians, and following the Independence War of 1877, the Russians had extended further South, taking the Southeastern Moldavia till the Danube.

The small kingdom could not afford any international troubles, so the ruling class had tried to maintain internal stability at any costs. They had to play a dangerous game between Austria-Hungary and Russia(potential enemies) and France(ally). So the Jews, present in large number(over 300,000) and who hadn't citizenship, were treated with suspicion by the Romanian politicians and press, many people seeing in them agents of the surrounding hostile countries. The ordinary citizens did not like them also, because their welfare in a cronically underdeveloped country aroused envy.

The Jewish question had been settled after WWI, when almost all Jews in Romania(most of whom had fought on the battlefield) got citizenship. They were by then over 800,000(counting also those from the re-gained Transylvania and Bessarabia).

The newly-united Romanian Kingdom had to face many problems(monetary and financial unity, unification of the civil services etc) but the worst of them was the open hostility from both Hungary and Soviet Russia.

In 1917, the Romanian State Treasury, the National Bank of Romania and the Crown had sent their valuables to Russia to protect them from the approaching German armies. Following the Russian Revolution from 1917, the Bolsheviks had agreed to give them back. But in 1917, following Communist agiotation among the Russian and Romanian troops in Moldavia, the Romanian Army had disarmed the Russians. As reprisals, Lenin ordered the confiscation of the Romanian valuables. He promised to give them back when Romania will adopt Communism(which happened, but only a fraction had been regained).

So, in 1919-1920-1922, the Romanian Kingdom was on the edge of the blade. Turbulent politics, worker strikes, Communist agitation were the norm. Only in 1922 the political situation had stabilized.

The future Leaders enter scene

After the reunification of 1918, the dominant doctrine in Romania was Liberalism, and the Liberal Party had formed solely the Goverment for a few years. But there were also some Nationalist groups, which had grown to parties.

A Law Professor from Jassy/Iasi, A.C. Cuza, had formed in 1923 a party known as Liga Apararii National-Crestine("National Christian Defense League") who claimed to fight for the Romanian culture, values and against Communism, defending the Christian Orthodox Church. Cuza supported numerus clausus or the limitation of the number of Jews in universities.

A disciple of Cuza was Corneliu Zelea Codreanu(1899-1938).

Image

Below the cover of a commemorative CD released by a Romanian modern publisher about the Iron Guard, with Codreanu's portrait. The handwritten text reads: "I say hello to those going towards the great Legionnaire victory. Corneliu Z. Codreanu, 1935."

Image

Born in Jassy/Iasi, in a family of Polish heritage(his father's real name was Iohan Antec Zelinsky, later changed to Ion Zelea Codreanu), the boy had been baptized after St. Cornelius, whose anniversary was on September 13th, his birthday.

Codreanu had graduated from high school in 1919, during the turmoils of reunification, Communist agitation and Romanian intervention in Communist Hungary. The same year, he and a few friends had held a meeting, and agreed to form a militia nucleus in the event of a Russian Communist invasion.

In 1925, Codreanu, graduate in Law from the Jassy/Iasi State University, had established a small political nucleus asking for an alliance between Romania and Italy. The organization was repelled by the pro-French Government, and some of the members tried. Codreanu acted as defense attorney. During a clash with the Police, on the stairs of the Municipal Court in Jassy/Iasi, there was a gunfight, in which Codreanu's bullet mortally wounded the Municipal Police Chief. He was tried and acquitted on ground of self-defense, after violent street demonstrations.

In 1927, Codreanu established the Legion of the Archangel Michael, political-cultural movement, whose aims were:

- strong opposition to Communism in all forms;

- emphasis on traditional Romanian values and Orthodox Christianity;

- limitation of the power of Jews, who were totally dominant in all liberal professions(doctors, lawyers, professors, officials etc);

- unification of the Romanian people around the nationalist ideals.

The leader's title was "the Captain", while the members were known as Legionnaires.

The majority of the Romanian inter-war intellectuals had been attracted by the Legion's ideals: Mircea Eliade(1907-1986), Emil Cioran, Constantin Noica etc. Some are known in the West, some are not.

The most brilliant of them might have been Nicolae C. "Nae" Ionescu(1891-1940), one of the smartest and most cultured Romanian philosophers.

Image

Born in 1891 in Braila, son of a Police officer and grandson of a peasant, he graduated from the high school in his native city. He studied Philosophy at the Bucharest State University, later he studied at Munich and Viena.

A fierce Nationalist, defender of the Romanian culture, Ionescu had become until the late 1920s one of the most renowned Romanian philosophers, journalists and politicians, being a private advisor to King Carol II. He did also use his former connections in the German intellectual and business world to become a successful businessman, representative for Romania of the biggest German companies, including I.G. Farben.

The Great Depression and beyond

During the 1929-1933 Great Depression, the Romanian economy, cronically undercapitalized and based mainly on agriculture, suffered horribly. The vast majority of the farmers were on the edge of disaster, and in cities the unemployed were rioting(somehow like in Argentine today). The government tried desperately to maintain the order, using also violent methods. On February 16, 1933, in the Grivita Railcar Workshops, some workers had also mounted a great strike, which later ended in violence, many of them being shot in the clashes with the Police and Gendarmes. In those conditions, the Legion raised her head. As a Deputy in the Romanian Parliament, Codreanu had held brilliant speeches regarding the fate of the people. His popularity grew day by day, and this was not liked by the Government.

On November 15, 1933, the Liberal Government led by prime Minister I.G. Duca had come to power. There had been plenty of alarm signals from the Western European governments and banking systems, who had granted huge loans to the Romanian economy, and who did not want, at any costs, a new Nationalist movement to get power. The Prime Minister had ordered the disbanding of the Legion, known by then also as Iron Guard, and the arrest of top members.

On November 22, a Legionnaire was shot dead by the Police while stricking electoral posters.

Six days later, another Legionnaire was shot dead.

November 24, 1933: The Captain published a denunciation of the crimes committed by the Government's men, indicating the Prime Minister as the driving force behind.

December 10, 1933: The reply comes from the Government: to prevent the participation of the Iron Guard in elections, 20,000 Legionnaires had been arrested and badly beaten by the Police. The agents also searched for the Captain, who had hidden himself.

December 12, 1933: another two Legionnaires, in two different cities, had been shot.

December 29: a Legionnaire released from the prison was shot dead.

The next day, December 30, the Legionnaires replied. Three of them had shot the Prime Minister Duca in Sinaia Railroad Station. The same day, a new Legionnaire had been shot in retaliation, followed by another on January 12, 1934.

The Black Years: 1935-1940

During 1935-1938, the Government had apparently suppressed the Legion. The Captain and another top members had tried to publicize their movement outside Romania, searching for support from Germany and Italy. A lot of top intellectuals had also tried to make the movement's ideals known in the world.

Professor Nae Ionescu had been the force that supported them all the time. His classes attracted not only the regular students, but also common people wanting to widen thier cultural horizon.

During the 1930s, there was some financial support from Hitler's Government. The same time marked Hitler's repeated attempts to gain an alliance with Romania. Once, in 1936, he even gave up the diplomatic language and said to the Romanian Ambassador openly: "Dear Sir, if Romania treats Germany with less hostility, both countries will gain more advantages from this"(or something like this, I can't remember the exact quote). The Ambassador's answer was so nebulous that I couldn't understand it.

In 1938, King Carol II, an accomplished Anglophile, had routed the leaders of the democratic parties amd established a personal one-pary dictatorship. The same time, he began a fierce anti-Legion campaign. Many governments had been changed by the King in just two years, but it was obvious that none of them could lead efficiently, nor could gain popular support.

The same year, the King's men had mounted a conspiracy to put the much-too-popular Codreanu behind bars. One of the members of the conspiracy was Nicolae Iorga, famous Romanian historian, Freemason, and a former friend of Coreanu's father. The Professor had used an insulting letter Codreanu had sent to him, and sued him. At the Legions' Green House, the Police discovered, during the trial, documents allowing the court to sentence the Legionnaires for anti-State activity to ten years in prison.

In November 1938, the King had attended a meeting with Hitler at Berghof. Hitler asked the King to put the Iron Guard in power. Carol's answer was swift: he ordered the execution of the Legion's leaders. Codreanu and thirteen other Legionnaires had been shot by the prison guards, under the charge of trying to escape.

During 1939, the Legion, led by the new chief, a man named Horia Sima, endured countless abuses. Hundreds of them had been beaten by the Police, tortured and persecuted. They retaliated by shooting Prime Minister Armand Calinescu. His death was paid with reprisals that took the life of more than 300 Legionnaires.

The Legion and the Jews

I would wish to blow up here a few myths:

- There were no anti-Jewish attacks from the Legionnaires; the Captain had friendly relationships with the Chief Rabbi, Dr. Alexandre Safran, who became after WWII Chief Rabbi of Geneva; his testimony was among the facts that helped the Legion to not be deemed a "criminal organization";

- The biggest enemy the Legion had among the Romanian citizens was the King's mistress, Elena Lupescu; this lady, although born Orthodox from an Orthodox-baptized Jew father, was still Jewess according to the Three-Generations rule, and an open enemy of Germany; she had a tremendous influence over Carol II;

- The Captain had proposed to the Chief Rabbi to encourage the immigration of the Jews after they will gain power; the Rabbi had simulated to agree.

1940 - the worst year for Romania

In 1940, more dreadful events for Romania had happened:

- Bessarabia was occupied by the Soviets alongside with Northern Bukovina;

- Northwestern Transylvania was granted by Hitler to Hungary, in the Vienna Award, as a revenge for the Romanian hostility in the 1930s;

- Romania's main ally, France, was gone;

In such conditions, Carol II appointed Prime Minister the General Ion Antonescu, on September 4th; The General asked the King to abdicate and to give the crown to Crown Prince Michael, on September 6th.

The same day, the General associated the Legion into power, proclaiming Romania "National-Legionnaire State".

Why did the General this thing, against his own interests?

Well, I'll make a supposition: he was a renowned Anglophile, and so a potential enemy to Hitler, who asked him to prove his loyalty to the Reich. So the General had to swallow the bitter pill.

During the winter 1940-1941, there were many underground fights for power between the General and the Legionnaires, who wanted full power.

The Rebellion

In January 1941, Antonescu had talked with Hitler, who informed him about the plans to attack the USSR, and asked him to do everything possible to maintain order in the country.

On January 21-23, 1941, the Legionnaires had acted openly against the Government, mounting a rebellion to rout Antonescu. They were defeated after two days of streetfighting with the Army.

110 dead Jews

During the rebellion, there were found 110 dead Jews in Bucharest. They had been shot, then hanged in meathooks with a plate reading Kosher meat. The Legionnaires were blamed with committing this atrocity. However, it's hard to imagine that those men, fighting for their lives against an Army using tanks in the street, would have left their positions and wandered through the city shooting Jews. The author might have been usual bandits and thieves, some dressed in stolen green Legionnaire uniforms.

The aftermath

After the rebellion, all Legionnaires had been driven out of the offices, their businesses confiscated, and the men firstly imprisoned, then sent to the front in the summer offensive, to the most dangerous sectors. Most of them had perished, except for a few who had flown to Germany, including Horia Sima, who died in Spain in 1993.

Some of the surviving Legionnaires had mounted a Resistance movement against the Soviet troops after 1944. Those who did survive the combat actions and the Communist prisons, were released in the 1960s. A few of them, in their 80s, are still alive.

~A Happy New Year to everyone,

Ovidius

Edited by: Ovidius at: 1/3/02 4:51:53 pm

Ovidius
Old Fighter

Posts: 1001
(1/2/02 10:40:05 pm)
Reply
Sorry for the typos...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
..but I usually type very fast.

This has been my 1000th post, so I guess I'll open a bottle of Romanian champagne.

Happy New Year/Glückliches Neues Jahr to everyone!

~Ovidius

Codreanu
New Member
Posts: 3
(1/3/02 12:43:11 am)
Reply Re: Sorry for the typos...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks Ovidius for that summary of the legionary movement. Can you please explain/tell me more about the split between A.C. Cuza and Codreanu wich led to the foundation of the iron guard.
/Codreanu

Ovidius
Old Fighter

Posts: 1021
(1/3/02 4:41:41 pm)
Reply
Some quotes
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Those whose faith knows no boundary should enter our ranks . But those who doubt or waver, should stay out. It does not matter for us if we win or lost the struggle giving away our life. Essential is that we are gathered in an union of iron."

Corneliu Codreanu

"The Hero , like the Saint don't 'hate' his adversary. Because he don't have anymore an individual criteria . He knows only the objective rules of the struggle and fight , rules that have an correspondence in the objective laws of an oath. And because of this , the Victory of the Hero is a living feeling more than an event. The Hero is 'victorious' during the battle and he will remain full of glory even if the battle will be lost."

Mircea Eliade

Edited by: Ovidius at: 1/3/02 4:44:36 pm

Ovidius
Old Fighter

Posts: 1022
(1/3/02 5:36:15 pm)
Reply
A stamp
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a stamp issued during the brief period the Legionnaires had participated in the Government, in the fall of 1940:

Image

The text under Codreanu's portrait reads: "Captain, make our country like is the Holy Sun in the sky".

In the upper left corner is the new Legionnaire sign, a combination between the original Five-Crosses and the German Balkenkreuz(which replaces the central cross), as a symbol of the Romanian-German alliance.

The text on the right says "November 8, 1927 - 1940"

~Regards,

Ovidius

Victor
New Member
Posts: 3
(1/3/02 9:43:58 pm)
Reply The Iron Guard
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ovidius,
I had a good opinion about you, but now it has totally changed. Why are you praising the legion? Do you think a dictatorship is better than a democracy?!

Ovidius
Old Fighter

Posts: 1030
(1/4/02 4:17:25 am)
Reply
Re: The Iron Guard
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<<I had a good opinion about you, but now it has totally changed. Why are you praising the legion? >>

Where on Earth do you see I'm praising the Legion? I've posted true information about them, to give the members here an idea what the Legion was.

I don't have special reasons to like them, because I think that after gaining total power, they would have established a theocracy, and this is the last thing I want.

But the fact that you grew flaming when you have seen messages about them here, that you know only about Iorga's death and other like this, indicates that you, although you seem to be also Romanian, know only what the Westerners know - myths, half-truths and prejudices.

~Regards,

Ovidius

Olivier Palardy
Member
Posts: 34
(1/4/02 4:47:28 am)
Reply
Re: Romanian Iron Guard
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ovidius,

You posts about the Iron Guard were very interesting and enlightening. You have attracted my attention for Romania and the Iron Guard. It is a neglected period that was almost unknown to me even if I'm very interested by the allies of Germany during the war. Could you suggest any good books on the subject ?

Mersi (thank you in romanian, correct me if I'm wrong)

Olivier Palardy

Ovidius
Old Fighter

Posts: 1031
(1/4/02 4:51:02 am)
Reply
Democracy
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On the other side, how on Earth could be a democracy the Romanian political environment of the 1920s-1930s, dominated by a few "aristocratic" clans, who were replaced in the 1930s by the King's favorite businessmen? If there was "democracy", whatever do you mean by that, how could Carol II establish a personal dictatorship with no opposition, not only popular, but neither from the ruling class?

~Regards,

Ovidius

Ovidius
Old Fighter

Posts: 1032
(1/4/02 4:56:26 am)
Reply
Good books
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Mersi" is the Romanized form of the French merci.

I can suggest plenty of books - enough to take you a lifetime to read, but almost all are in Romanian.

There is a book-CD set telling the story of the Legion(with some good music also) available here:

http://www.angelfire.com/zine/serparu/cap2.html

~Best regards,

Ovidius

Codreanu
New Member
Posts: 4
(1/4/02 7:45:53 pm)
Reply Re: Good books
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"For my legionaries" have been released in swedish(!) by the swedish recistance movement. So the iron guard isn't that unknown in the west.
http://www.nordland.net/legionarer.html

Victor
New Member
Posts: 6
(1/4/02 9:21:55 pm)
Reply Re: Iron Guard
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On the other side, how on Earth could be a democracy the Romanian political environment of the 1920s-1930s, dominated by a few "aristocratic" clans, who were replaced in the 1930s by the King's favorite businessmen? If there was "democracy", whatever do you mean by that, how could Carol II establish a personal dictatorship with no opposition, not only popular, but neither from the ruling class?

Modern democracy is based on a few things: the three separate powers of the state, freedom of speech, of the press and free elections. All these existed. Of course the mechanism didn’t work perfectly, but take a look at Al Capone’s Chicago in the same period. The idea is that the system was working and who knows how it may have developped. These „aristrocratic” clans you are refering to made modern Romania. The Bratianu family (you probably mean them, because the National Peasent Party didn’t have aristocrats, like the liberals) did more for Romania than you imagine. So please don’t stain their memory with your legionnaire propaganda.
The reason Carol II was able to establish a personal dictatorship withoput much opposition is because he was prefered to fascist dictatorship. In the 1937 ellections, no party managed to get the majority of the votes. This made it easy for the king to take the power the folowing year. Romania was last standing democracy in Eastern Europe.

But the fact that you grew flaming when you have seen messages about them here, that you know only about Iorga's death and other like this, indicates that you, although you seem to be also Romanian, know only what the Westerners know - myths, half-truths and prejudices.

Oh I am not worthy of your total knowledge, mighty Ovidius! Please enlighten us with your wisdom! J
Why don’t you tell everyone else that in the 1932 ellections they had the pathetic score of 2.37%. So much for your so-called popularity. They were outlawed because they didn’t believe in the democratic system and were trying to replace it.


MagyarCrusader
Visitor
(1/5/02 9:15:18 am)
Reply minor point
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"They were by then over 800,000(counting also those from the re-gained Transylvania and Bessarabia)."
I love the way you chose the words "re-gained" in the meaning that Transylvania have previously belonged to a Romanian state. The first official Romanian state I know of was created in 1865, as you said, "freshly independent." But then, Romania could have respected America and president Woodrow Wilson's 14 points including self determination, yet all of Transylvania and Banat changed hands without a single vote being cast. This may be off-topic from the Iron Guard, but I'm just wondering how Romanian history justifies that?

Victor
New Member
Posts: 9
(1/5/02 5:01:33 pm)
Reply Extra on the Iron Guard
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The extreme meassures taken by the government were a response to the Legion’s methods. They have introduced the assassinate as a political weapon. For example Ion I Mota shot Ion Vernicescu, without killing him. On 25 October 1924, Codreanu killed C G Manciu, the Iasi police prefect.In june 1933, the legionary Gh. Beza tried to kill Constantin Anghelescu, the Internal Affairs undersecretary of state. On 29 December 1933, they assasinated the prime minister I G Duca.
They were outlawed because of their methods and ideas, just like the communists were. The only thing is that they were more numerous and fanatical than the communists were.
The highest popularity ranking was in 1937, when they turned out on the third place in the ellections with 15.58%, as the „Everything for the Country” Party. As you can see they never had a large popularity.

Ovidius left out the ideological part (he alone knows why). A part which I think is very important.
Here are some samples:
„We do not approve hate. We admit violence as a national education method”.
„The Romanian from tommorow must have a severe, hard, eroic existence, he must have the sense of the colectiv ego and of the national good, he must be violent and extremist”.
„The fall of the Romanian people is dued to some inferior race elements...that is the altering of the old Daco-Roman blood with Greek and Gipsy blood, and now with Jewish blood”.
„We do not approve hate. We admit violence as a national education method”.
„The Romanian from tommorow must have a severe, hard, eroic existence, he must have the sense of the colectiv ego and of the national good, he must be violent and extremist”.
The solution would be to ”make a rigorous social and racial selection”...” the inferior races must be completely separated from the main ethnic group”... „the sterilization” (of some useless people) ”is considered a praise of beauty, of morality, of perfection”.
„The racial purification of the Romanian people is a life and death problem”.
Do I really need to go on?

Locked

Return to “Minor Axis Nations”