Is it just me, or are subliminal swastikas built into the design of the overhanging ceiling wood panelling?Geoff Walden wrote:Now a shot of the southeast corner, with parts of the east and south walls.

Is it just me, or are subliminal swastikas built into the design of the overhanging ceiling wood panelling?Geoff Walden wrote:Now a shot of the southeast corner, with parts of the east and south walls.
Its quite a common design for a valted ceiling in the period and even now for a certain element of thes it just me, or are subliminal swastikas built into the design of the overhanging ceiling wood panelling?
I stumbled across this painting today while researching something else. It hangs in the National Museum of Warsaw, and still looks to be in the same frame as when it was hung in the Berghof [if that B&W photo is from that period].Geoff Walden wrote:After the fireplace, still on the south wall, is a painting that is pretty well known, and shows up well in period images (Item 9). This is sometimes called a Botticelli or a Titian, but it has been identified as Paris Bordone's "Venus et Amor" (although I believe the correct title should be "Venus et Cupid" ... but I don't really know anything about classical art.![]()
I have read that this original piece still exists in a museum, maybe in Warsaw, but I haven't found a picture of it online.
Geoff
Sure looks like the same painting.Matt Gibbs wrote:I wonder how many portraits of Hitler's parents were done, if you include copies of an 'original'. Going by the various names of artists and the note somewhere that Hitler also did a version of his own from a photograph or small portrait there must be three or four?
Speer's researched footnotes in his autobiography quote Professor Knirr as one artist [also Knirr did some official portraits of Hitler and some stamp designs too].
Speer's text: - "After his early death an oil painting of Schreck hung in Hitler's private office at Obersalzberg side by side with one of his mother, there was none of his father".
Speer's chapter note :- "Both pictures were painted [from photographs] by Hitler's official painter Professor Knirr, whom Hitler always rewarded handsomely for his work. A photograph from a later period shows that Knirr was also commissioned to do a portrait of Hitler's father."
From the info re the auction of the paintings of Hitler's parents it may be that Speer was mistaken, or that Speer was not aware that other painting[s] might have been commissioned by Hitler. [trying to discredit Speer as 'wrong' seems flawed to me, since there seems to be reference to more than one portrait of Hitler's mother].
Johst apparently also did a portrait of Geli Raubal. [from Birgit Schwarz book Hitler und die Kunst]
http://books.google.de/books?id=QGiU-zv ... &q&f=false
What a strange thing to say, it was bombed by the allies then torched before the arrival of the allies. It was gutted and some how the empty shell should have been rebuilt? Why and who would pay or would a gutted house of Hitler be fine. It was a good idea to tear it down.Annelie wrote:Isn't it ironic that this Jewish American man who is selling the paintings says
yet there is no qualms when destroying buildings like the Berghof which had more than the photosThis is representing a very important and relevant part of our human history," he said.
was an important and relevant part of the history of the time?
It seems that this work (whether the original or not) has been recently offered on sale. Certainly the granite base differs from the one depicted in the original photo.Geoff Walden wrote: ↑23 Oct 2008 21:26Next came a bronze bust of Dietrich Eckart on a pedestal (Item 11). Here is a period view of the original. Supposedly, this work still exists in a collection in England, but doubt has been cast on its authenticity (I won't go into that here - I have no part of that debate.)
Geoff