No, Himmler specifically spoke about race when it came to the Gypsies living in Germany. The Nazis concluded that the Gypsies were originally Aryans but had mixed with non-Aryans over the centuries and only a small percentage of Gypsies were still really Aryans.Sid Guttridge wrote: ↑08 Sep 2021, 10:52Hi GLG,
You post, "Actually, the Nazis pursued a policy based on race against the Gypsies living in Germany. The Nuremberg Laws were extended to include the Gypsies as non-Aryans. In 1936 a biology department began to look into the racial origins of the Gypsies and concluded that the vast majority of Gypsies were not Aryans. In 1937, the Nazis began racial experiments on the Gypsies living in Germany."
Yes, but this was a political decision and doesn't make them non-Aryan. If other Northern Indians speaking Aryan languages were considered Aryan, this would include, not exclude, the Gypsies.
The underlying question here is: Were other Northern Indians speaking Aryan languages considered Aryan in Nazi ideological terms?
Cheers,
Sid
But the Nazis’ adoption of “Aryan” couldn’t have always equated with Indo-Europeans because Finns were considered to be Aryans, even though Finnish isn’t an Indo-European language. OTH, Turks are racially mixed and some are not ‘white’ yet Turks were considered Aryans too.