A discussion in another thread (
http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic. ... 2#p1918542) turned to the
Reihenwerfer & Raketenwerfer/Vielfachwerfer and I decided it was more appropriate to move it over to this thread. Because of continued confusion over not only the allocations of these vehicles but also what exactly they were (as recently revealed in the English translation of Kortenhaus' History of the 21.PD), I am posting some additional info that will at least make clear the differences between the
Reihenwerfer and the Raketenwerfer/Vielfachwerfer and will also strive to clarify the question of allocations.
A point of terminology first: I will use Raketenwerfer in this post for brevity’s sake, but both Raketenwerfer and Vielfachwerfer were used. Spielberger uses both “Raketenwerfer” and “Raketen-Vielfachwerfer” and the records of the 21.PD refer to them as “R.v.-Werfer”. Also, for the sake of clarity, I will use the English plural form for Werfer (Werfers) rather than the German except in direct quotes from the German.
All of these vehicles were built on the chassis of the French SOMUA halftrack, of which there were two major forms: the MCG and the MCL. The MCL had a more robust chassis and a more powerful engine and was constructed to tackle heavier jobs than the MCG. There were two forms of
Reihenwerfer: one constructed on the MCG chassis (which Spielberger calls the leichte
Reihenwerfer) and one constructed on the MCL chassis (schwerer
Reihenwerfer). Following is a translation of the appropriate sections of
Beute-Kraftfahrzeuge und -Panzer der deutschen Wehrmacht:
***********************************************************************************
"USE OF SOMUA HALF-TRACKS BY THE GERMAN ARMED FORCES
D-specifications, apart from the usual identification numbers, were published for the two base types MCG and MCL:
- Zugkraftwagen S 303 (f), Type MCL
- Zugkraftwagen S 307 (f), Type MCG
Both types were used by Panzerjäger units and artillery as towers for heavy cannons (including the 7.5 cm Pak 40).
Among the equipment for the "Schnelle Brigade West" provided by the Baustab Becker, both SOMUA types played an important role. A majority of these vehicles was armored, however, it must be mentioned that the shortages of materials of those years made a sufficient armoring impossible and the quality of the armor plates as well as their processing left much to be desired. Almost all vehicles converted by Becker had the MCG chassis as base:
- Panzerjäger with 7.5 cm Pak 40 (72 vehicles)
- Armored ammunition carriers (48 vehicles)
- Armored Engineer vehicles with side-mounted portable bridges (no number given)
-
Light Reihenwerfer with 16 tubes (36 vehicles)
In the rear part of the vehicle there was a 360˚ swiveling platform on which were arranged 16 grenade launcher tubes (today: mortar tubes) in two rows. The mortar bombs were secured by a holding device at the upper end of the tube and fired either individually or in salvos. The official designation read "Reihenwerfer-Schießgerät RG 16". The elevation amounted to 40 to 90 degrees.
The MCL chassis was used for:
-
Heavy Reihenwerfer with 20 tubes, likewise using French 8.14 cm Mortars 278 (f). (16 vehicles)
Allocated to the heavy weapons companies. The first presentation of the device was in 1943 in Hillersleben.
- Raketenwerfer with 48 rockets (6 vehicles)
The 8 cm rocket launcher was a mobile launching pad for 48 rockets in two layers one above the other each with 12 launcher rails. Total movement in traverse 360 degrees by handwheel operation. Werfer elevation 45 degrees. The programmed fire sequence (firing order) permitted the firing of all 48 rockets in a single salvo.
Ammunition:
- Wing-stabilized 8 cm rockets. Smoke and high explosive shells (the rockets could also be shot by airplanes).
Hitler ordered full-scale tests with this weapons system in March 1944. It was intended to be used particularly by units of the Waffen-SS.
Weight of the werfer (with two salvos of ammunition) 6850 kg
Weight of the werfer (without ammunition) 6200 kg
The length of the launching rails was 1860 mm, the maximum range 5300 m. In the vehicle were carried:
- 232 high-explosive projectiles
- 56 smoke projectiles
The weapon system was a reproduction of the Soviet "Katyusha" (Stalin organ) and was originally intended for the Panzerwerfer 42 (armored version of the MAULTIER).
Full and partially-armored carrier vehicles received a modified cooling and exhaust system since they were built lower compared to the original vehicles because of armoring and thus the target surface was reduced. After the war one of these armored half-track vehicles was equipped by the French army with a 15 cm Panzerwerfer 42 (10-tubed) of German design. It remained an experiment only.
********************************************************************************************************
So, the Reihenwerfers were essentially multiple mortar carriers and the Raketenwerfers were multiple rocket carriers.
Summary of source material:
As Alan McCoubrey mentions in the thread that I linked above, Kortenhaus' information regarding these vehicles is conflicting. On Page 13 of the German version, he states that Baustab Becker produced "12
Reihenwerfer mit Zgkw. SOMUA" (on SOMUA chassis)" (while
Spielberger - and Spielberger apparently obtained his info directly from Becker as he cites the "Alfred Becker private archive" as one of his sources - states that there were 36 light Reihenwerfers (MCG) and 16 heavy Reihenwerfers (MCL) created by Baustab Becker). Then, on Pg. 15 Kortenhaus states that the 10.Kompanie of both Pz.-Gren.Rgt. 125 & 192 were equipped with "vier
Reihenwerfer, je 24 Rohren 8,14 cm" (four Reihenwerfers, each with 24 8.14 cm mortar tubes). Neither type of
Reihenwerfer had 24 tubes. The information on Pg 586,however, is in line with Spielberger: "10.Werfer-Kompanie mit vier
Reihenwerfer 8,14 cm (16 Rohre) auf SOMUA MCG (f)" where "16 Rohre" is the 16 mortar tubes, the correct number for the light
Reihenwerfer.
As for the Raketenwerfer, Kortenhaus (Pg. 16 & 587) indicates that these compose the 10.Batterie of Pz.-Art.-Rgt. 155, but gets the chassis info incorrect on pg. 587:
Pg. 16: 10. Raketen-Batterie - vier Raketenwerfer, 48 Rohre (8,14 cm)
Pg. 587: 10. Batterie mit zwei Unic P107(f) (sic) Mehrfachwerfer (should be SOMUA MCL)
The number of vehicles present also does not match (Pg. 10 says vier (four) and Pg. 587 says zwei (two).)
The English translation gets it even worse. Not only did the translator repeat some of Kortenhaus’s mistakes, but he compounds them by translating “
Reihenwerfer” as “multiple rocket launchers”:
Pg 26: 12 multiple rocket launchers on SOMUA prime mover - compare Kortenhaus Pg 13 above
Pg 28: 10. Kompanie with four multiple-rocket launchers, 24 tubes each (8.14 cm) - compare Kortenhaus Pg 15 above
Pg. 441: 10th Werfer-Kompanie with four
Reihenwerfer (multiple-rocket launchers) 8.14 cm (16 tube) on SOMUA MCG (f) - compare with Kortenhaus Pg 586 above
The only history of the 21.PD neu that was widely available from 2002 to 2007 was the Editions Heimdal book by Jean-Claude Perrigault
21.Panzer-Division. On Pg 218-219 he lays out the OOB of the division which for the most part matches Kortenhaus’, but his wording for 10./Pz.-Art.Rgt. 155 is different (2
Reihenwerfer So à 24 ramps). While he uses the term
Reihenwerfer, it is clear that he means Raketenwerfers as, on Pg 225, he describes the demonstration of the Raketenwerfer on the coast at Lion-sur-Mer/Rivabella on 30 May, 44: “Il s’agit de quatre engins de la 10./Pz.Art.Rgt. 155 (III.Abteilung) dont les châssis français “Unic” (sic) portent chacun 24 rampes lance-fusées russes type “Katioucha” (Orgues de Staline).” [It concerned four vehicles of the 10. /Pz.Art.Rgt. 155 (III.Abteilung) on French “Unic” chassis, each carrying 24 rails for Russian Katyusha-type rockets (Stalin Organs).” Perrigault cites the information on Pg 218-219 to Alain Verwicht
Alain Verwicht (
Panzer Voran! No. 6), Pg. 30 & 31, indicates that the 10. Kompanie of both Pz.-Gren.-Rgt. 125 & 192 was the “schwere Werferkompanie (Sfl.) armée de quatre 8,14 cm schwerer (sic)
Reihenwerfer (16 Rohre) auf SOMUA MCG (f)…” He does not refer to the artillery in this issue, but in
Panzer Voran! No. 12, Pg 26-29 he includes a section on the Raketenwerfers in which he states that the 10./Pz.-Art.Rgt. 155 was composed of two Raketenwerfers. He also correctly indicates the chassis for the Raketenwerfer as SOMUA, not Unic P 107.
Allocations:
We must first make the caveat that the Gliederungen for the 21.PD are, as are those for many other Divisions, problematical. The Reihenwerfers are included but the Raketenwerfers are not. Both existed and were used by 21.PD as photographic and other documentary evidence proves. For this reason it is necessary to support the Gliederungen with independent sources.
Evidence related to the Reihenwerfers:
Since the
Reihenwerfer was a “home-made” weapon, there is no standard symbol for one. Because of this, a special symbol for the
Reihenwerfer is indicated at the top, left-hand corner of the ones that I have copies of (July 43 & June, July & August 1944):
The initial Gliederung for 21.PD dated 15.7.43 which was included with Anlage 1 zu OKH Chef H Rüst und BdE AHA Ia(I) Nr. 3515/43 g.Kdos, Ausbau der schnellen Brigade West zu einer Pz.Div. contains the same symbol for
Reihenwerfer and, in addition, specifies that they are 16 tube (Werfer) version. In this initial setup, there are 4 allocated to the 4. and 8. Coy each of Pz.-Gren.Rgt. 125 (192 having not been created yet) and 4 are allocated to the StuG Abteilung. There was no 10./Pz.-Art.-Rgt. 155 at this time yet:
Almost one year later, by June 1944, this symbol is used, as expected, for the 10. Kompanie of both Pz.-Gren.Rgt. 125 & 192 and in the case of the two Pz.Gren.Rgt., it is stated again, in writing below, that each have “4 Reihenw So”. The
Reihenwerfer symbol is represented once again on the Gliederungen, but in the place where Kortenhaus, Perrigault, Verwicht et al. have all before stated that should contain 2 (or 4) Raketenwerfers, in the 10./Pz.Art.Rgt. 155:
As mentioned above, the initial Gliederung shows that 4 Reihenwerfers were included in the Stab of StuG-Abt. 200. In his book
Fire Brigades, Kamen Nevenkin states that by 11.10.43, the 5./StuG.Abt. 200 was equipped with Reihenwerfers and this Batterie was integrated into Pz.Art.Rgt. 155 as the 10.Batterie. So, the Reihenwerfers that are shown as part of the Stab in the initial Gliederung became the 5.Batterie/StuG-Abt. 200 (or, as is hinted to as a possibility in a map shown below, the Reihenwerfers remained as part of the Stab and a separate 5.Batterie was set up later) which later became 10./Pz.Art.Rgt. 155 per Oberkommando des Heeres GenStdH/Org.Abt. Nr.I/4632/43. g.Kdos date 11.10.43 (from BAMA RH-10/23 as kindly informed by Mr. Nevenkin and the document kindly provided by a friend):

(Translation: The 5th (
Reihenwerfer) battery of Sturmgesch.Abt.200 is organically incorporated as the 10. battery of the Pz.Art.Rgt.).
This order shows that at least at one point in its existence, the 10./Pz.Art.Rgt. 155 was composed of Reihenwerfers. Zetterling also support this Batterie being composed of Reihenwerfers.
I think there is no debate over the allocations of the Reihenwerfers to the Panzergrenadier-Regiments so I will make no comment about that except that I have stated in prior posts that the light Reihenwerfers (16 tubes, MCG chassis) were allocated to the 10. Kompanie of each Pz.-Gren.Rgt. and that the heavy Reihenwerfers were allocated to the 10./Pz.Art.Rgt. 155 (and possibly to StuG.Abt. 200). I cannot now recall on which evidence that I based those prior statements, so I am hesitant to consider that a proven fact at this point.
Evidence related to the Raketenwerfers:
While there is no mention either way of the Raketenwerfers in the Gliederungen, there is reliable evidence that a platoon of Raketenwerfers were included in the Stab of StuG-Abt. 200. The following photo shows a SOMUA MCL Raketenwerfer being inspected by Rommel very shortly before D-Day. One can clearly see the tactical sign for a StuG unit with the “St” for Stab inside:
Also, the officer on the left is Major Becker, the CO of StuG-Abt. 200, but one can also argue that Becker was present not as the CO of StuG-Abt. 200, but rather as the head of Baustab Becker, the one who oversaw the design and construction of the weapons being demonstrated.
There is also documentary evidence (that I am not at liberty to share at this time) of this Zug within the Stab of StuG-Abt. 200 long after D-Day. The number of vehicles in this Zug, however, is not indicated in any source that i have currently. In the Wochenschau clip showing Raketenwerfers firing (
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NfLds95LdAA, at 7:50) it appears that there are at least 3 firing. Since only six were made, this would possibly allow for another Zug of three, but I am more inclined to think that any that were not allocated to this Zug were held as replacements. It does not, however, prove that two or three Raketenwerfers were not, indeed, allocated elsewhere, but further circumstantial evidence, presented next, indicates that all 6 produced were possibly retained in one Zug.
This circumstantial evidence is available in some maps of StuG-Abt. 200 locations during Operation Goodwood, which were taken from Maj. Becker’s diary, as published in
Over the Battlefield, Operation Goodwood by Ian Daglish. On one map there is a symbol which I have never seen before (A.) and another one matching the symbol for
Reihenwerfer (B.) as used on the Gliederungen. The map indicates that there were 6 of the “unknown” half-tracked vehicle and 2 of the
Reihenwerfer:
Unfortunately, if there is a key for the symbols , they were not included in the book. I have been unable to obtain a copy of Becker’s diary (I know someone who has it but they refuse to share it). A pity, because this diary would probably clear up many questions. There are several possibilities for the mystery vehicles. According to the Gliederung, Stug.-Abt. 200 did have six 2 cm AA guns as part of the Stab (presumably on Unic P107 chassis), but the symbol employed is not even close to that for an SP AA. There were also a total of 6 Raketenwerfers produced by Baustab Becker according to Spielberger, so another possibility is that this symbol represents the Raketenwerfers. Since all of the other symbols on the map are standard symbols, it is probable that the angled, one-pronged arrow is, like that for the
Reihenwerfer, a symbol that was created by Becker to represent the Raketenwerfer as there was no standard symbol available (which presumes that the Raketenwerfer was considered distinct from the Nebelwerfer).
In summary, apart from suspect secondary sources, there are no indications that Raketenwerfers were ever allocated to 10./Pz.Art.Rgt. 155, while we do have primary documentation that the 5./StuG.Abt. 200, which was composed of Reihenwerfers was transferred to Pz.Art.Abt. 155 to become the 10.Batterie. There is also photographic and other documentary evidence indicating that the Raketenwerfers were integrated into the Stab of StuG.Abt. 200. While this evidence is not absolutely conclusive, I believe that the case for the 10./Pz.Art.Rgt. 155 being equipped with Reihenwerfers is much stronger than it being equipped with Raketenwerfers.