JU-88 as a dive bomber vs conventional bombing

Discussions on all (non-biographical) aspects of the Luftwaffe air units and general discussions on the Luftwaffe.
Post Reply
User avatar
Cult Icon
Member
Posts: 4477
Joined: 08 Apr 2014, 20:00

JU-88 as a dive bomber vs conventional bombing

#1

Post by Cult Icon » 22 Jan 2022, 03:20

The JU-88 had dive bombing capabilities.

Does anyone know (or have sources) that identify:

1. When did the JU-88 dive bomb and when did it perform conventional bombing?

2. What percentage of bombing sorties were dive bombing?

Felix C
Member
Posts: 1202
Joined: 04 Jul 2007, 17:25
Location: Miami, Fl

Re: JU-88 as a dive bomber vs conventional bombing

#2

Post by Felix C » 25 Jan 2022, 23:19

I believe the shallow dive replaced the steeper dive as was used on the attack on HMS Ark Royal in 1939.
There were so many sorties, thousands or more, I think it is a herculean task to differentiate.


User avatar
Cult Icon
Member
Posts: 4477
Joined: 08 Apr 2014, 20:00

Re: JU-88 as a dive bomber vs conventional bombing

#3

Post by Cult Icon » 27 Jan 2022, 16:26

Felix C wrote:
25 Jan 2022, 23:19
I believe the shallow dive replaced the steeper dive as was used on the attack on HMS Ark Royal in 1939.
There were so many sorties, thousands or more, I think it is a herculean task to differentiate.
Presumably the dive was a more efficient use of bombload, due to the higher accuracy. I am looking for doctrine behind this use.

Besides conventional bombing roles (interdiction) and attacks on shipping the JU-88 was also used to hunt down trains, particularly on the Eastern Front. There were even specialized squadrons for this role. IT seems that the dive was more likely in this scenario, I am still in the process of researching.

As for the success claims of the German bomber (KG) units, Soviet armored trains/box cars, Soviet airfields/destroyed aircraft on the ground, and destroyed vehicles factor heavily.

User avatar
Cult Icon
Member
Posts: 4477
Joined: 08 Apr 2014, 20:00

Re: JU-88 as a dive bomber vs conventional bombing

#4

Post by Cult Icon » 27 Jan 2022, 19:12

This is a flying game simulation of JU-88 dive bombing. Not sure how accurate it is but it is an interesting watch:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=65Jw-CkRq3w

footage of JU 88 dive bombing:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gJooYDwvWw0

User avatar
Cult Icon
Member
Posts: 4477
Joined: 08 Apr 2014, 20:00

Re: JU-88 as a dive bomber vs conventional bombing

#5

Post by Cult Icon » 30 Jan 2022, 20:35

In reading personal accounts, the JU-87 is cited as releasing the bombs at 400 meters, the JU-88 at 800 meters.

User avatar
Sheldrake
Member
Posts: 3747
Joined: 28 Apr 2013, 18:14
Location: London
Contact:

Re: JU-88 as a dive bomber vs conventional bombing

#6

Post by Sheldrake » 30 Jan 2022, 21:06

The Germans had an analogue computer based bomb site for dive bombing Bombenzielanlage ("Bomb Target System"), sometimes referred to as the Bomb Ziel Automat (BZA). In 1941 the BZA-2 was introduced and consistent bombing results were claimed.
This was designed to calculate the precise release of bombs during dive-bombing. It was fitted to a number of aircraft types, including the Junkers Ju 88. The unit controlled an aiming mark on sight in front of the pilot. The computer assessed the angle of dive, aircraft track, and altitude. The operator set other variables, such as barometric pressure, target altitude, airspeed and wind speed. During operation, the bomb(s) were released when an aiming mark coincided with the target.
There is a picture of the system on this webpage
http://www.donhollway.com/graveneymarsh/index.html

There is a discussion of Ju88 as a Dive bomber on this IL2 combat flight simulator forum
https://forum.il2sturmovik.com/topic/56 ... procedure/

User avatar
Urmel
Member
Posts: 4901
Joined: 25 Aug 2008, 10:34
Location: The late JBond

Re: JU-88 as a dive bomber vs conventional bombing

#7

Post by Urmel » 31 Jan 2022, 00:51

Here's an example. Dive would have been used for any kind of precision attack I suppose.

https://rommelsriposte.com/2012/02/26/l ... 19-jan-42/
The enemy had superiority in numbers, his tanks were more heavily armoured, they had larger calibre guns with nearly twice the effective range of ours, and their telescopes were superior. 5 RTR 19/11/41

The CRUSADER Project - The Winter Battle 1941/42

User avatar
Pips
Member
Posts: 1283
Joined: 26 Jun 2005, 09:44
Location: Country NSW, Australia

Re: JU-88 as a dive bomber vs conventional bombing

#8

Post by Pips » 31 Jan 2022, 03:13

If you can get your hands on the book "The Life And Death Of The Luftwaffe" by Werner Baumbach, it makes for interesting reading.

Baumbach flew the Ju88 through the early years of the war, and became something of an anti-shipping expert. In France he flew both dive bomb and level attacks, depending upon the target. For example on 10th May he flew an anti-flak mission, which involved dive bombing the target. On the 11th he flew level bombing missions. During the Battle of Britain he flew mostly level attack missions. In the time between end of the BoB and the start of the Greece campaign he flew anti shipping missions out over the Norwegian Sea, all involving dive bombing attacks against shipping. Over the Med he flew almost exclusively anti-shipping dive bomber missions against convoys and ships. Occasionally broken up by level bombing attacks over Libya.

So almost from the very start of the war the Ju88 was employed in both the dive bomber and a level bomber role, the actual tactic dependant upon the target.

User avatar
Cult Icon
Member
Posts: 4477
Joined: 08 Apr 2014, 20:00

Re: JU-88 as a dive bomber vs conventional bombing

#9

Post by Cult Icon » 05 Feb 2022, 20:05

Thanks for the recommendations.

User avatar
Cult Icon
Member
Posts: 4477
Joined: 08 Apr 2014, 20:00

Re: JU-88 as a dive bomber vs conventional bombing

#10

Post by Cult Icon » 26 Feb 2022, 20:10

7:00 Maritime interdiction with DO-17, appears that they are diving

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u9TdWfOKnCw&t=2s

Denniss
Member
Posts: 370
Joined: 26 Nov 2004, 03:52
Location: Germany

Re: JU-88 as a dive bomber vs conventional bombing

#11

Post by Denniss » 26 Feb 2022, 21:02

it seems more like they had a very creative cutter mixed with some fake/model images. Plus mix of footages from Ju 88 and Do 17

Post Reply

Return to “Luftwaffe air units and Luftwaffe in general”