Like I said, your general, agitated behaviour and wanton mishandling of the facts made me lost interest replying, or even reading your posts.
Please consider yourself ignored
Kurfurst - you openly and directly accused me in at least TWO places of doctoring the figures on LW bombing sorties in the Dunkirk area. You had the book in front of you I was taking the figures from, were able to confirm them for yourself as accurate, but STILL persisted in accusing me of misrepresenting what was down in print for all to see...even after I specifically drew your attention in writing to the EXACT location and nature of the figures.
So I provided the figures concerned, in a scan STRIAGHT from the book - and thus proved YOU were the one lying when you accused me of those actions. In law, defamation (also called calumny, libel, slander, and vilification) is the communication of a statement that makes a false claim, expressly stated or implied to be factual, that may give an individual, business, product, group, government or nation a negative image
. Slander refers to a malicious, false, and defamatory spoken statement or report, while libel refers to any other form of communication such as written words or images.
You, sir, committed libel and lied about my actions and I require a retraction. Don't think you can openly lie about someone and slander them and expect not to be shown as the real liar yourself. You were given every chance to correct your assertions and accusations about the data in Hooton's Phoenix triumphant
, but CHOSE not to. Learn to loose a point of debate gracefully, rather than throw your toys out of your playpen AND make slanderous accusations.