Id. aerial bombs
-
- Member
- Posts: 17711
- Joined: 02 Oct 2008 17:18
- Location: Spain
Re: Id. aerial bombs
Hi all,
An image from Ebay. SC500 or SC250 bombs ?? Bf 110 ??
Sturm78
An image from Ebay. SC500 or SC250 bombs ?? Bf 110 ??
Sturm78
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- Member
- Posts: 971
- Joined: 11 Jul 2005 14:55
- Location: Poland
Re: Id. aerial bombs
They look like SC 250.
-
- Member
- Posts: 17711
- Joined: 02 Oct 2008 17:18
- Location: Spain
Re: Id. aerial bombs
Thank you, GrzesioGrzesio wrote
They look like SC 250.
Here, an interesting image of SC50 (I think) bombs with Dinort nose rods
Image from Ebay
Sturm78
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- Member
- Posts: 971
- Joined: 11 Jul 2005 14:55
- Location: Poland
Re: Id. aerial bombs
Very interesting photo indeed! These rods are, however, ZAR (Zünderabstandsrohr) not much thicker DinSt.
-
- Member
- Posts: 17711
- Joined: 02 Oct 2008 17:18
- Location: Spain
Re: Id. aerial bombs
Thank you for your correction, Grzesio
Here, another image from Ebay. I think SC500 and SC50-SD70 bombs
Sturm78
Here, another image from Ebay. I think SC500 and SC50-SD70 bombs
Sturm78
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- Member
- Posts: 971
- Joined: 11 Jul 2005 14:55
- Location: Poland
Re: Id. aerial bombs
The bigger bombs are SC 250 - HE code 13 (Fp 60/40) and elAZ (25) fuze marking can be seen. One can also see the HE code 110 on one of the smaller bombs, so it's a SBe 50 concrete fragmentation bomb.
-
- Member
- Posts: 17711
- Joined: 02 Oct 2008 17:18
- Location: Spain
Re: Id. aerial bombs
Thank you Grzesio. I don`t have much information about the different markings on the German bombs....Grzesio wrote
The bigger bombs are SC 250 - HE code 13 (Fp 60/40) and elAZ (25) fuze marking can be seen. One can also see the HE code 110 on one of the smaller bombs, so it's a SBe 50 concrete fragmentation bomb.
Here, an image from SA-Kuva archive. It is can see the makings III on a bomb and 55 on other bombs
III means Güteklasse III = Three piece construction ??
Which is the meaning of the 55 marking ??
SC50 or SD70 bombs ??
Sturm78
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- Member
- Posts: 971
- Joined: 11 Jul 2005 14:55
- Location: Poland
Re: Id. aerial bombs
Yes, III is for the quality class, meaning actually the weakest body construction rather than 3 pieces as such (class II bodies could also be made of three pieces). One can see a welded ogive piece as well as a letter K just under the III - so it's the SC 50 K.III means Güteklasse III = Three piece construction ??
13A on one of the bombs is a HE code (Amatol 50/50).
It's for the elAZ (55) fuze.Which is the meaning of the 55 marking ??
And if you look closely, there are two lines of text visible at the rear part of the body - so the bombs in the background would be SBe 50, what is corroborated by the lack of stripes on their tail cones (SBe were painted green overall without other colour markings).
I wrote a blog article on German bombs markings, it's sadly not translated (yet), but maybe the Google translator will do the job: https://blogkaboom.blogspot.com/2020/01 ... y.html?m=1
-
- Member
- Posts: 17711
- Joined: 02 Oct 2008 17:18
- Location: Spain
Re: Id. aerial bombs
Thank you very much for your answer and for the link to your aticle.
I have not been able to read it in its entirety yet but it looks very interesting and I think it will be of great help to me in identifying German bombs...
Regards
Sturm78

I have not been able to read it in its entirety yet but it looks very interesting and I think it will be of great help to me in identifying German bombs...

Regards
Sturm78
-
- Member
- Posts: 17711
- Joined: 02 Oct 2008 17:18
- Location: Spain
Re: Id. aerial bombs
Hi all,
An image from Ebay. I would say a SC250 bombs but it is difficult to ensure for me from this angle
Sturm78
An image from Ebay. I would say a SC250 bombs but it is difficult to ensure for me from this angle
Sturm78
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.