Heinkel_He162_Salamander

Discussions on all (non-biographical) aspects of the Luftwaffe air units and general discussions on the Luftwaffe.
User avatar
Panzerspiel
Member
Posts: 67
Joined: 04 Mar 2007 02:56
Location: Hanover, Pennsylvania USA

Post by Panzerspiel » 11 Mar 2007 03:14

All,
I also understand that the back mounted turbojet engine gave the machine a high center of gravity and it tended to roll over during flight.
Panzerspiel

User avatar
ChrisMAg2
Member
Posts: 641
Joined: 04 Aug 2003 08:26
Location: Hannover, Germany or Manila, Philippines

Post by ChrisMAg2 » 11 Mar 2007 08:16

Universal the God of War wrote:a he-162 pilot claimed he achieved an aerial victory in a he-162 is this true ?
The claim is unverfied! So the decision -if it were true or not- cannot be made.

Regards
Christian M. Aguilar

hellmanofthehammerforce
Member
Posts: 27
Joined: 20 Jul 2005 18:45
Location: London

Post by hellmanofthehammerforce » 14 Mar 2007 21:59

I can't quite remember where I read this, so admittedly I'm on shaky ground, but I had an idea in post-war allied evaluations, the 162 was assessed as not being such a bad aircraft, providing it was in the hands of an experienced pilot?

zmija
Member
Posts: 271
Joined: 15 Oct 2005 21:56
Location: Slovenia

Post by zmija » 15 Mar 2007 00:18


hellmanofthehammerforce
Member
Posts: 27
Joined: 20 Jul 2005 18:45
Location: London

Post by hellmanofthehammerforce » 15 Mar 2007 20:31

Hi

not sure that's the exact same thing I read, but yeah, that was the jist of it. Still, for its hidden qualities, it was never gonna work for teen pilots I'd guess. Fascinating looking machine tho - we have a couple in museums in London, along with a 163 - I find that area of wartime engineering so interesting, this weird meeting of desperately ill-conceived projects (in the short term context at least) and cutting-edge technology - I guess the Natter might be the ultimate expression of that!

DragunovSVD
Member
Posts: 313
Joined: 18 Dec 2006 02:05
Location: Ottawa, Canada

Post by DragunovSVD » 06 Apr 2007 04:56

can't quite remember where I read this, so admittedly I'm on shaky ground, but I had an idea in post-war allied evaluations, the 162 was assessed as not being such a bad aircraft, providing it was in the hands of an experienced pilot?

yeah... i read somewhere on the web that it was a pleasure to fly in the hands of a good pilot, and the Brits captured one and they flew it at airshows for 5(?) or so years until the tail snapped off (flimsy wood construction?)

the avation museum here in Ottawa has 2 he 162s.

User avatar
kamehouse
Member
Posts: 291
Joined: 19 Sep 2006 07:56
Location: Nice France

Post by kamehouse » 06 Apr 2007 08:19

The Imperial War Museum in London have one on display.
Regards,
K

User avatar
faf_476
Member
Posts: 758
Joined: 31 Dec 2006 19:36
Location: Philippines

Post by faf_476 » 07 Apr 2007 08:48

Whose pilot is that?

User avatar
Cantankerous
Member
Posts: 1223
Joined: 01 Sep 2019 21:22
Location: Newport Coast

Re: Heinkel He 162 Salamander

Post by Cantankerous » 14 Sep 2023 16:05

I took this photo of a Heinkel He 162A-2 (Werknummer 120077) at the Planes of Fame Museum in Chino, California, on April 13, 2019. This He 162 was captured by the British at Leck and sent to the United States in 1945, where it received the designation FE-489 (Foreign Equipment 489) and later T-2-489.
He 162 Sparrow.JPG
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Return to “Luftwaffe air units and Luftwaffe in general”