Me-163B, Me-262B-1a/U1
-
- Member
- Posts: 41
- Joined: 26 Aug 2004 03:05
- Location: Israel, Russian
Me-163B, Me-262B-1a/U1
Hi guys.
A few days ago i bought one book, in that book i found these two strange planes:Me-163B Comet-1 and the other one is Me-262B-1a/U1,
it said in the book that these two planes were "extraordinary" in one way or another in the German Air Force.
Now, my question is: Is there anyone who heard about these two planes,
if anyone did hear about them please reply.
P.S
I will send pics of these two planes as soon as i will be able to.
Chaser
A few days ago i bought one book, in that book i found these two strange planes:Me-163B Comet-1 and the other one is Me-262B-1a/U1,
it said in the book that these two planes were "extraordinary" in one way or another in the German Air Force.
Now, my question is: Is there anyone who heard about these two planes,
if anyone did hear about them please reply.
P.S
I will send pics of these two planes as soon as i will be able to.
Chaser
-
- Member
- Posts: 1899
- Joined: 03 May 2004 18:08
- Location: Canada
The Me 163 and Me 262 were both very advanced for thier time.
The Me163 was a rocket powered interceptor.
http://www.sml.lr.tudelft.nl/~home/rob/me163.htm
While the Me-262B-1a/U1 was an interim night fighter. The 262 B-1 was the two seat trainning version of the 262 and the /U1 was the modification to the nighter fighter role. the Me-262B-1a/U1 was designed to fill the night fighter role untill a purpose built me 262 night fighter could be brought into serive.
http://www.warbirdsresourcegroup.org/LRG/me262.html
The Me163 was a rocket powered interceptor.
http://www.sml.lr.tudelft.nl/~home/rob/me163.htm
While the Me-262B-1a/U1 was an interim night fighter. The 262 B-1 was the two seat trainning version of the 262 and the /U1 was the modification to the nighter fighter role. the Me-262B-1a/U1 was designed to fill the night fighter role untill a purpose built me 262 night fighter could be brought into serive.
http://www.warbirdsresourcegroup.org/LRG/me262.html
-
- Member
- Posts: 41
- Joined: 26 Aug 2004 03:05
- Location: Israel, Russian
Thank you very much
Thank you very much bryson 109...
Chaser
Chaser
-
- Member
- Posts: 2728
- Joined: 12 Mar 2002 23:28
- Location: OR
-
- Member
- Posts: 15
- Joined: 31 Aug 2004 17:36
- Location: Croatia
first voice. i didn't knew that there was two-seated me262.bryson109 wrote:The Me 163 and Me 262 were both very advanced for thier time.
The Me163 was a rocket powered interceptor.
http://www.sml.lr.tudelft.nl/~home/rob/me163.htm
While the Me-262B-1a/U1 was an interim night fighter. The 262 B-1 was the two seat trainning version of the 262 and the /U1 was the modification to the nighter fighter role. the Me-262B-1a/U1 was designed to fill the night fighter role untill a purpose built me 262 night fighter could be brought into serive.
http://www.warbirdsresourcegroup.org/LRG/me262.html
and, yes, it was magnificent aircraft, an revolution in aircraft history. nobody did so much for weapon technologyas germans did in ww2, accept americans with a-bomb, but it was anyway done with german "brains".
chester: you've just discovered me163 and me262, but what will u say when you'll se an lippisch dm1 and heinkel he162?
Last edited by rusty on 03 Sep 2004 00:48, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Member
- Posts: 15
- Joined: 31 Aug 2004 17:36
- Location: Croatia
here are some pictures for u chester...
lippisch dm1 first delta wing aircraft
http://www.cals.lib.ar.us/miller/images/LIP_DM1.jpg
heinkel 162 one of first fsw (forward swept wing) technology aircraft wit jet engine. i think that junkers build also fsw plane years ago before he162
http://www.hut.fi/~andres/gifs/he162fsw.jpg
lippisch dm1 first delta wing aircraft
http://www.cals.lib.ar.us/miller/images/LIP_DM1.jpg
heinkel 162 one of first fsw (forward swept wing) technology aircraft wit jet engine. i think that junkers build also fsw plane years ago before he162
http://www.hut.fi/~andres/gifs/he162fsw.jpg
-
- Financial supporter
- Posts: 1152
- Joined: 07 May 2003 09:13
- Location: California
Me-163B...
I don't think that a 162 ever flew with a forward-sweep wing. Maybe I'm wrong but I think, although there were designs for these aircraft (in other types as well), they never flew. In fact, experimental designs in the U.S. based on this concept have never worked out...too much "torque" twisting of the wing or whatever.rusty wrote:
heinkel 162 one of first fsw (forward swept wing) technology aircraft wit jet engine. i think that junkers build also fsw plane years ago before he162]
The only 162's (built) that I know of had a straight leading-edge design; not even swept-back.
Tom
Wait, I correct myself...the Ju-287. OK, not successful.
-
- Member
- Posts: 15
- Joined: 31 Aug 2004 17:36
- Location: Croatia
tscrawford: ok, if u don't belive me...
http://www.kheichhorn.de/html/body_heinkel_he_162.html - deutsch
http://tanks45.tripod.com/Jets45/Histor ... He-162.htm - english
pictures and text...

http://www.kheichhorn.de/html/body_heinkel_he_162.html - deutsch
http://tanks45.tripod.com/Jets45/Histor ... He-162.htm - english
pictures and text...

-
- Member
- Posts: 15
- Joined: 31 Aug 2004 17:36
- Location: Croatia
Re: Me-163B...
oh, here u are with ju287 info...tscrawford wrote:I don't think that a 162 ever flew with a forward-sweep wing. Maybe I'm wrong but I think, although there were designs for these aircraft (in other types as well), they never flew. In fact, experimental designs in the U.S. based on this concept have never worked out...too much "torque" twisting of the wing or whatever.rusty wrote:
heinkel 162 one of first fsw (forward swept wing) technology aircraft wit jet engine. i think that junkers build also fsw plane years ago before he162]
The only 162's (built) that I know of had a straight leading-edge design; not even swept-back.
Tom
Wait, I correct myself...the Ju-287. OK, not successful.
http://tanks45.tripod.com/Jets45/Histor ... Ju-287.htm
regards
sven
-
- Financial supporter
- Posts: 1152
- Joined: 07 May 2003 09:13
- Location: California
me-163, etc...
Hello Sven,
My original response was regarding a 162 with forward-sweep wings. I have never seen a picture of a flying one. Certainly there were plans and designs (as I said) but did one actually fly? I don't think so.
Tom
My original response was regarding a 162 with forward-sweep wings. I have never seen a picture of a flying one. Certainly there were plans and designs (as I said) but did one actually fly? I don't think so.
Tom
-
- Member
- Posts: 15
- Joined: 31 Aug 2004 17:36
- Location: Croatia
Re: me-163, etc...
well, visit then links above, you'll see them "in the air"...tscrawford wrote:Hello Sven,
My original response was regarding a 162 with forward-sweep wings. I have never seen a picture of a flying one. Certainly there were plans and designs (as I said) but did one actually fly? I don't think so.
Tom
-
- Financial supporter
- Posts: 1152
- Joined: 07 May 2003 09:13
- Location: California
Re: me-163, etc...
I'll take another, closer look. Thanks for the info!rusty wrote:well, visit then links above, you'll see them "in the air"...tscrawford wrote:Hello Sven,
My original response was regarding a 162 with forward-sweep wings. I have never seen a picture of a flying one. Certainly there were plans and designs (as I said) but did one actually fly? I don't think so.
Tom

Tom
later...I don't yet find the photos you refer to. I saw the drawings and what appears to be a model with swept-forward wings but nothing in the air. Maybe I'm just dense. Are you sure that you aren't refering to the straight leading-edge versions?? Please redirect me to the correct photographs.
-
- Member
- Posts: 486
- Joined: 03 Sep 2002 10:54
- Location: Holland,The Netherlands
-
- Member
- Posts: 4785
- Joined: 15 Jun 2004 15:19
- Location: Finland