Experimental German Aircraft

Discussions on all (non-biographical) aspects of the Luftwaffe air units and general discussions on the Luftwaffe.
Swordsman
Member
Posts: 222
Joined: 11 Nov 2005, 11:40
Location: london

Experimental German Aircraft

#1

Post by Swordsman » 12 Dec 2005, 19:24

Anyone interested in German aircraft should look at this fantastic website. http://www.luft46.com
Last edited by Swordsman on 13 Dec 2005, 11:24, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
bryson109
Member
Posts: 1899
Joined: 03 May 2004, 19:08
Location: Canada

#2

Post by bryson109 » 12 Dec 2005, 22:40

Link does not work you need to get rid of the '.

http://www.luft46.com


jaybond
Member
Posts: 16
Joined: 01 Dec 2005, 10:33
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

#3

Post by jaybond » 13 Dec 2005, 11:58

We all know that many of the German jet designs are very futuristic looking. Why was the flying wing-style aircraft never been adopted for military aircraft production by other nations until we saw the B-2 Spirit? Why wait until 1980s?

Swordsman
Member
Posts: 222
Joined: 11 Nov 2005, 11:40
Location: london

#4

Post by Swordsman » 13 Dec 2005, 12:18

jaybond wrote:We all know that many of the German jet designs are very futuristic looking. Why was the flying wing-style aircraft never been adopted for military aircraft production by other nations until we saw the B-2 Spirit? Why wait until 1980s?
I don't know, good question, perhaps the Germans were so far ahead that it took a long time to catch up with them. Also what about the flying saucers that the Germans invented in the war, why aren't they in production?

User avatar
Davide Pastore
Member
Posts: 2768
Joined: 26 Nov 2005, 23:05
Location: Germagnano, Italy
Contact:

#5

Post by Davide Pastore » 13 Dec 2005, 13:42

jaybond wrote: We all know that many of the German jet designs are very futuristic looking. Why was the flying wing-style aircraft never been adopted
Flying wings are a bit older than that:
http://www.century-of-flight.freeola.co ... 0Wings.htm
http://www.ctie.monash.edu.au/hargrave/dunne.html

Additionally, the contemporary projects of other nations were not different from German ones. German ones are just better known !!!

See the warbird below: it's an artist's impression of a project dated 6 october 1942 (Boulton-Paul P.100) and I bet it's way ahead of anything German-designed at the same date.

Davide
Attachments
P100.jpeg
Source: Tony Buttler, British Secret Projects - Fighters and Bombers 1935-1950
P100.jpeg (18.65 KiB) Viewed 7002 times

User avatar
Kim Sung
Member
Posts: 5039
Joined: 28 May 2005, 14:36
Location: The Last Confucian State

Re: Experimental German Aircraft

#6

Post by Kim Sung » 13 Dec 2005, 13:59

Swordsman wrote:www.luft46.com
Interesting~!

User avatar
Topspeed
Member
Posts: 4785
Joined: 15 Jun 2004, 16:19
Location: Finland

#7

Post by Topspeed » 13 Dec 2005, 14:47

is it a Libelulla II ?

Jack Northrop made those flying wing kites back in the 40ies too.
Attachments
Libellula-2.jpg
Looks like this a bit ?
Libellula-2.jpg (21.64 KiB) Viewed 6986 times

User avatar
Davide Pastore
Member
Posts: 2768
Joined: 26 Nov 2005, 23:05
Location: Germagnano, Italy
Contact:

#8

Post by Davide Pastore » 13 Dec 2005, 15:20

That Libellula seems a much-smaller kin of the huge Vickers Type C (december 1942 drawing) depicted in the cover below.
64m span, 29m length, 80-ton (including 25t of bombs) T/O weight, 6x turbocharged Centaurus, 615Kmh

Davide
Attachments
Buttler.jpeg
Buttler.jpeg (29.35 KiB) Viewed 6979 times

jaybond
Member
Posts: 16
Joined: 01 Dec 2005, 10:33
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

#9

Post by jaybond » 14 Dec 2005, 09:01

The German saucers are very obscure in its existence. But definitely , flying saucers are such a phenomena after the war. Many people linked it to the German saucer technology. But the thing is, even if the German saucer & its technology was real, why we never saw even a slightest piece of it after 60 years?(minus the Avrocar, not too radical\unconventional in concept) Not even on space programmes?!

User avatar
Topspeed
Member
Posts: 4785
Joined: 15 Jun 2004, 16:19
Location: Finland

#10

Post by Topspeed » 14 Dec 2005, 13:45

Flying Pancake.

This caused notions for flying saucers from the US citizens.

This is the most successfull LUFT46 product..several models made as models..also flying. Different gear though.

http://www.luft46.com/heinkel/helerche.html
Attachments
Carter Hummingbird.JPG
Carter Lerche
Carter Hummingbird.JPG (39.66 KiB) Viewed 6850 times
mini_cake.jpg
UFO
mini_cake.jpg (36.11 KiB) Viewed 6851 times

User avatar
Davide Pastore
Member
Posts: 2768
Joined: 26 Nov 2005, 23:05
Location: Germagnano, Italy
Contact:

#11

Post by Davide Pastore » 14 Dec 2005, 14:26

jaybond wrote:The German saucers are very obscure in its existence.
Have you read the thread about Foo-Fighters?
http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic. ... 4&start=45

Davide

User avatar
Grzesio
Member
Posts: 985
Joined: 11 Jul 2005, 15:55
Location: Poland
Contact:

#12

Post by Grzesio » 14 Dec 2005, 15:16

jaybond wrote:We all know that many of the German jet designs are very futuristic looking. Why was the flying wing-style aircraft never been adopted for military aircraft production by other nations until we saw the B-2 Spirit? Why wait until 1980s?
Because flying wing (and tailless aircraft to some degree) suffers from stability problems until it's equipped with fly-by-wire (i.e. artificial stability) system. It's particularly hard to control in yaw due to very close placement of the rudder(s) (if they are present at all; such an aircraft can also have too violent reaction to elevator and rudder movements, as theres no inertial 'dumping' normally caused by a long fuselage), then the pitch trim very significantly changes with changing speed of flight (what is caused by aerodynamical way of stabilizing tailles a/c in flight by using selfstabilizing wing profile or swept wings with twisted wingtips), what demands constant trim changes if we want the aircraft trimmed neutrally. Then, these non-computerized measures to stabilize the aircraft result in increased drag, what in turn lowers aerodynamical advantages of clean, low-drag flying wing airframe.

Regards

Grzesio

JAJACEK
Member
Posts: 79
Joined: 25 May 2005, 13:48
Location: Warszawa, Poland

#13

Post by JAJACEK » 14 Dec 2005, 17:12

Topspeed wrote:is it a Libelulla II ?
No, it isn't. It's a Miles M.35. Libelulla was biggest, I think.

http://www.obliczahistorii.pl/samoloty/ ... art&art=24
http://www.miles-aircraft.com/Projects_ ... plane.html
or
http://www.aero51.plus.com/html/gallery/m39b.htm

jaybond
Member
Posts: 16
Joined: 01 Dec 2005, 10:33
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

#14

Post by jaybond » 15 Dec 2005, 07:46

Topspeed, nice pictures you got there. But the original Lerche was supposed to take off vertically :D?. So, the Flying Pancake is a working airplane 8O , too bad it never saw action.It could be a worthy opponent to the Japanese Shinden :D.
Grzesio, good points ! Grazie Grzesio.

User avatar
Topspeed
Member
Posts: 4785
Joined: 15 Jun 2004, 16:19
Location: Finland

#15

Post by Topspeed » 15 Dec 2005, 13:12

Pancake airborne by Giuseppe.
Attachments
pancake_airborne.jpg
pancake_airborne.jpg (33.26 KiB) Viewed 6756 times

Post Reply

Return to “Luftwaffe air units and Luftwaffe in general”