Who is this fellow?
Who is this fellow?
Can anyone help me identify this fellow? The only information I have is that he may be an Admiral.
Thanks.
/Marcus
Thanks.
/Marcus
- Attachments
-
- who.jpg (10.52 KiB) Viewed 2504 times
- Jeremy Dixon
- Member
- Posts: 3590
- Joined: 06 Oct 2002, 13:19
- Location: England
Karl-Jesko von Puttkamer
The photo is of Karl-Jesko Von Puttkamer 100% sure. (1900-1981) He was Hitlers Naval adjutant from March 1935 to June 1938, and from Sept 1939 to May 1945. Apparently he is credited with persuading Hitler to cancel the planned invasion of Britain using barges. In 1970 & 1971 he recorded his recollections onseven very lenghty tapes. He died on 14 March 1981.
He was badly wounded on 20 July 1944 at Rastenburg.
He was badly wounded on 20 July 1944 at Rastenburg.
-
- Banned
- Posts: 86
- Joined: 08 Oct 2002, 04:41
- Location: argentina
putkammer
in efect he is karl jesko von puttkammer and where you obtained this photograph? because I never could obtain anyone in the www. thanks
- Matt Gibbs
- Member
- Posts: 3005
- Joined: 23 Mar 2002, 01:46
- Location: United Kingdom
- Contact:
Source
Looks very like the photo included in the Walter Frentz archive and published by Arndt in their book Hitlers Berghof. Please note it would be a VERY good idea to add the source on photos posted here because the Frentz archive vigourously persues individuals with litigation who use their images without permission or credit...
Regards
Matt Gibbs
Regards
Matt Gibbs
- Gareth Collins
- Member
- Posts: 1493
- Joined: 17 Oct 2002, 19:38
- Contact:
-
- Banned
- Posts: 86
- Joined: 08 Oct 2002, 04:41
- Location: argentina
photos
plase if you have got any example with this quality and if it is an example of walter frentz the best , please send a copy by this page web
thanks .
this photos are more important and must to be free thanks
[email protected]
thanks .
this photos are more important and must to be free thanks
[email protected]
- HerrGeneral
- Member
- Posts: 90
- Joined: 16 Apr 2004, 10:11
- Location: Europe
Re: Source
Matt Gibbs wrote:Looks very like the photo included in the Walter Frentz archive and published by Arndt in their book Hitlers Berghof. Please note it would be a VERY good idea to add the source on photos posted here because the Frentz archive vigourously persues individuals with litigation who use their images without permission or credit...
Regards
Matt Gibbs
Well, posting these pictures on a history related web board is not problematic, since because of their extreme historical importance they fall under into “fair use” laws.
-
- Member
- Posts: 11158
- Joined: 04 Feb 2003, 17:57
- Location: South UK
Re: Source
This is not true. Walter Frentz photos are owned by his son who still also owns the negatives and therefore the copyright. I know for a fact that Herr Frentz will take legal action for misuse or use without permission of his father's photographs. He works for a very large media and photo archive company who back him. These particular photos were taken privately by his father at the Führerhauptquartier and were never part of the public domain. They were and still are owned by the Frentz family and publication of them without prior permission is contrary to copyright ownership, which in this case, is still valid.HerrGeneral wrote:Matt Gibbs wrote:Looks very like the photo included in the Walter Frentz archive and published by Arndt in their book Hitlers Berghof. Please note it would be a VERY good idea to add the source on photos posted here because the Frentz archive vigourously persues individuals with litigation who use their images without permission or credit...
Regards
Matt Gibbs
Well, posting these pictures on a history related web board is not problematic, since because of their extreme historical importance they fall under into “fair use” laws.
Max
- HerrGeneral
- Member
- Posts: 90
- Joined: 16 Apr 2004, 10:11
- Location: Europe
Re: Source
Max History wrote:This is not true. Walter Frentz photos are owned by his son who still also owns the negatives and therefore the copyright. I know for a fact that Herr Frentz will take legal action for misuse or use without permission of his father's photographs. He works for a very large media and photo archive company who back him. These particular photos were taken privately by his father at the Führerhauptquartier and were never part of the public domain. They were and still are owned by the Frentz family and publication of them without prior permission is contrary to copyright ownership, which in this case, is still valid.HerrGeneral wrote:Matt Gibbs wrote:Looks very like the photo included in the Walter Frentz archive and published by Arndt in their book Hitlers Berghof. Please note it would be a VERY good idea to add the source on photos posted here because the Frentz archive vigourously persues individuals with litigation who use their images without permission or credit...
Regards
Matt Gibbs
Well, posting these pictures on a history related web board is not problematic, since because of their extreme historical importance they fall under into “fair use” laws.
Max
You don't understand the legal cocept of "fair use", fair use does imply that the material is copyrighted, now publishing it in a book, or any other kind of commercial use, is an anoter matter.
Here's a few links on the subject.
http://www.cetus.org/fairindex.html
http://www.copyright.iupui.edu/
http://www.umuc.edu/library/copy.html
http://fairuse.stanford.edu/
What is illegal is when the user atomicmisfit labels some of the Frentz work as a “part of his own collection” and even puts his logo on it.
Like in this thread…
http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic. ... c&start=30
I’ve also seen a few other users doing the same thing with the Frentz items, as well as offering to sell them, all of that is illegal.
Like say Waland66 and his little website where he not just labeling the Frentz photos with his own logo, but is even offering to sell them.
However just putting the picture on here, an educational historical web board, and acknowledging full Frentz copyrights, and no others, can appropriately be considered fair use, since the image itself is an important historical document.
-
- Member
- Posts: 11158
- Joined: 04 Feb 2003, 17:57
- Location: South UK
- HerrGeneral
- Member
- Posts: 90
- Joined: 16 Apr 2004, 10:11
- Location: Europe
Max History wrote:Then why was Mr Frentz successful in a legal action against somebody doing just what you say is legal?
Max
He sued someone over posting a few of his father’s pictures on a web board?
Well, what really matters is the intended use, and with “fair use” it primarily is educational, now those pictures had to abuse that in one way or another.