Conflicting data on RDA
Re: Conflicting data on RDA
Vielen Dank!
There are times in history when staying neutral means taking sides.
Re: Conflicting data on RDA
Another two cases, this time from Die Generale der Luftwaffe:
Bruno Bräuer and Walter Lackner are both listed as Generalleutnant with RDA from 01.12.1942 (2).
Wolfgang Erdmann and Walter Gosewisch are both listed as Generalmajor with RDA from 01.09.1943 (8).
What is correct?
Bruno Bräuer and Walter Lackner are both listed as Generalleutnant with RDA from 01.12.1942 (2).
Wolfgang Erdmann and Walter Gosewisch are both listed as Generalmajor with RDA from 01.09.1943 (8).
What is correct?
There are times in history when staying neutral means taking sides.
Re: Conflicting data on RDA
No Luftwaffe experts who can help?
I found some more cases:
August Schmidt ("Die Generale der Luftwaffe") and Kurt Student ("Die Ritterkreuzträger der Fallschirmtruppe") are both listed as Generalleutnant from 01.01.1940 (1).
Schmidt must be the correct (1). Maybe Student was the (7)? Note that "DRKTdFsTr" also gives Student's RDA as General der Flieger as (5) although no other officer shared the same RDA, so it must have been the (1).
Arthur Laule and Hans Nuber are both listed as Generalleutnant with RDA from 01.09.1943 (1).
Kurt von Falkowski and Otto Krueger are both listed as Generalmajor with RDA from 01.11.1941 (9).
Ernst Drechsel and Maximilian Hantelmann are both listed as Generalmajor with RDA from 01.02.1942 (4).
Maximilian Müller and Karl-Lothar Schulz are both listed as Generalmajor with RDA from 01.01.1945 (12).
I found some more cases:
August Schmidt ("Die Generale der Luftwaffe") and Kurt Student ("Die Ritterkreuzträger der Fallschirmtruppe") are both listed as Generalleutnant from 01.01.1940 (1).
Schmidt must be the correct (1). Maybe Student was the (7)? Note that "DRKTdFsTr" also gives Student's RDA as General der Flieger as (5) although no other officer shared the same RDA, so it must have been the (1).
Arthur Laule and Hans Nuber are both listed as Generalleutnant with RDA from 01.09.1943 (1).
Kurt von Falkowski and Otto Krueger are both listed as Generalmajor with RDA from 01.11.1941 (9).
Ernst Drechsel and Maximilian Hantelmann are both listed as Generalmajor with RDA from 01.02.1942 (4).
Maximilian Müller and Karl-Lothar Schulz are both listed as Generalmajor with RDA from 01.01.1945 (12).
There are times in history when staying neutral means taking sides.
Re: Conflicting data on RDA
Walter Lackner was the GL mit RDA vom 01.12.1942 (2). Bräuer should have been (3), but this is still unconfirmed.
DAL 1944 says Gosewisch was the (18), but I don't get anywhere near so many officers. A typo for (10)? In any case, Erdmann should be the (8).
Per Absolon, Schulz was the (12) and Müller the (13).
The other cases remain unsolved.
DAL 1944 says Gosewisch was the (18), but I don't get anywhere near so many officers. A typo for (10)? In any case, Erdmann should be the (8).
Per Absolon, Schulz was the (12) and Müller the (13).
The other cases remain unsolved.
There are times in history when staying neutral means taking sides.
-
- Member
- Posts: 754
- Joined: 16 Aug 2010, 06:49
Re: Conflicting data on RDA
Vizeadmiral
01.01.1921 (1) Zenker, Hans
01.01.1921 (2) ???????????????
Maybe Hugo Dominik was the (2)?
--------------------------------------------------------
Vizeadmiral
01.04.1945 (2) Schulte-Mönting, Erich
01.04.1945 (2) Baltzer, Martin
Which is correct?
--------------------------------------------------------
Konteradmiral
29.11.1919 (-) Michelsen, Andreas
29.11.1919 (A) Heinrich, Paul
29.11.1919 (B) ?????????????????
Heinrich Löhlein
22.11.1919 (B) Konteradmiral
A typo for (29)?
--------------------------------------------------------
Konteradmiral
01.11.1920 (?) Dominik, Hugo
01.11.1920 (?) Püllen, Thedor
01.03.1945 (?) Bleckwenn, Wilhelm
01.03.1945 (?) Waue, Georg
Aisin
01.01.1921 (1) Zenker, Hans
01.01.1921 (2) ???????????????
Maybe Hugo Dominik was the (2)?
--------------------------------------------------------
Vizeadmiral
01.04.1945 (2) Schulte-Mönting, Erich
01.04.1945 (2) Baltzer, Martin
Which is correct?
--------------------------------------------------------
Konteradmiral
29.11.1919 (-) Michelsen, Andreas
29.11.1919 (A) Heinrich, Paul
29.11.1919 (B) ?????????????????
Heinrich Löhlein
22.11.1919 (B) Konteradmiral
A typo for (29)?
--------------------------------------------------------
Konteradmiral
01.11.1920 (?) Dominik, Hugo
01.11.1920 (?) Püllen, Thedor
01.03.1945 (?) Bleckwenn, Wilhelm
01.03.1945 (?) Waue, Georg
Aisin
Re: Conflicting data on RDA
01.01.1921 Zenker
01.10.1921 Dominik
01.04.1945 (2) Schulte-Mönting
01.04.1945 (3) Baltzer
29.11.1919 (B) Löhlein
01.11.1920 (1) Dominik
01.11.1920 (2) Püllen
30.01.1945 Bleckwenn (transferred from the Heer on 01.03.1945)
01.03.1945 Waue
01.10.1921 Dominik
01.04.1945 (2) Schulte-Mönting
01.04.1945 (3) Baltzer
29.11.1919 (B) Löhlein
01.11.1920 (1) Dominik
01.11.1920 (2) Püllen
30.01.1945 Bleckwenn (transferred from the Heer on 01.03.1945)
01.03.1945 Waue
There are times in history when staying neutral means taking sides.
-
- Member
- Posts: 754
- Joined: 16 Aug 2010, 06:49
Re: Conflicting data on RDA
Vielen Dank!
Aisin
Aisin
-
- Member
- Posts: 8695
- Joined: 11 Nov 2004, 13:53
- Location: Hohnhorst / Deutschland
Re: Conflicting data on RDA
Thank you for this one!!30.01.1945 Bleckwenn (transferred from the Heer on 01.03.1945)
Jan-Hendrik
Re: Conflicting data on RDA
An easy solution to this problem: Laule was a z.V.-Offizier! He changed from aktiv to z.V. on 1 December 1942.Arthur Laule and Hans Nuber are both listed as Generalleutnant with RDA from 01.09.1943 (1).
It WERE 18 officers, but in some sources their RDA was given as 01.03.1943, although they were ohne RDA until September.DAL 1944 says Gosewisch was the (18), but I don't get anywhere near so many officers. A typo for (10)? In any case, Erdmann should be the (8).
There are times in history when staying neutral means taking sides.
Re: Conflicting data on RDA
According to the HPA Personalveränderungen list of 10 Aug 1944, Generalarzt Dr. Hans Spiegelberg had a RDA of 1 Sep 1944 (1). Generalarzt Dr. Hans Hartleben had a RDA of 1 Sep 1944 (2).
-
- Member
- Posts: 754
- Joined: 16 Aug 2010, 06:49
Re: Conflicting data on RDA
Hans Halm
17.04.1940 General der Infanterie z.V.
or
01.05.1940 General der Infanterie z.V.
Does anyone know who is correct?
Aisin
17.04.1940 General der Infanterie z.V.
or
01.05.1940 General der Infanterie z.V.
Does anyone know who is correct?
Aisin
Re: Conflicting data on RDA
This is irrelevant for Halm's RDA because he, like any other z.V.-Offizier, retained his old RDA (in this case of 01.10.1935). But the dates must be wrong anyway, because Halm is already listed as General der Infanterie z.V. in the Stellenbesetzung of 15.11.1939. Halm was either placed zur Verfügung des Heeres on the Mobilmachungstag or on 11.09.1939 when he became KG stv. VIII. AK (succeeding Hammerstein-Equord).
There are times in history when staying neutral means taking sides.