German High Commanders of WW2

Discussions on the personalities of the Wehrmacht and of the organizations not covered in the other sections. Hosted by askropp and Frech.
Post Reply
User avatar
askropp
Forum Staff
Posts: 7451
Joined: 08 May 2008, 00:42

Re: German High Commanders of WW2

#361

Post by askropp » 15 Dec 2019, 16:37

AOK 17 has been updated according to the KTB (thanks to John "Histan" for the hint). We now have a gap between Boriß and Schulz. I would assume that Schwatlo-Gesterding managed affairs in mid-July, but there may have been even another interim manager.
There are times in history when staying neutral means taking sides.

User avatar
askropp
Forum Staff
Posts: 7451
Joined: 08 May 2008, 00:42

Re: German High Commanders of WW2

#362

Post by askropp » 19 Dec 2019, 17:54

Apparently, a whole bunch of new KTB has been added to "German Docs in Russia". So far, new info has been added to:

HGr A
HGr B
HGr Nord
HGr Kurland
AOK 12
AOK 16
AOK 17
AOK 25
There are times in history when staying neutral means taking sides.


Rossano
Member
Posts: 5569
Joined: 26 May 2007, 00:56
Location: Italy

Re: German High Commanders of WW2

#363

Post by Rossano » 19 Dec 2019, 18:20

Thanks Askropp. Rgds., Rossano

User avatar
AlifRafikKhan
Member
Posts: 8001
Joined: 15 Sep 2007, 20:02
Location: Sukabumi, Indonesia
Contact:

Re: German High Commanders of WW2

#364

Post by AlifRafikKhan » 10 Jun 2020, 16:54

Great thread!

HM
Member
Posts: 1570
Joined: 20 Sep 2003, 09:12
Location: Netherlands

Oberbefehlshaber 7. Armee

#365

Post by HM » 27 Jun 2020, 12:47

„KTB“ Pz. AOK 5 entry 31.08.1944:

„Der O.B. der 7. Armee, General Eberbach, …, gerät in Gefangenschaft. … Auf Grund dieser Ereignisse findet ein Befehlswechsel bei den beiden Armeen nicht statt. SS-Oberst-Gruppenführer Dietrich übernimmt mit Pz. AOK 5 nunmehr auch für den gefangenen General Eberbach die Führung der 7. Armee.“

Entry German High Commanders of WW2:
22.08.1944 – 31.08.1944 General der Panzertruppe Heinrich Eberbach (mFb)
31.08.1944 – 01.09.1944 General der Infanterie Hans von Obstfelder (mstFb)
01.09.1944 – 21.02.1945 General der Panzertruppe Erich Brandenberger (mFb)

Any official documents that von Obstfelder was put in charge on the 31.08?

HM.

Mori
Member
Posts: 1632
Joined: 25 Oct 2014, 12:04
Location: Europe

Re: Oberbefehlshaber 7. Armee

#366

Post by Mori » 27 Jun 2020, 13:17

He got the job for less than 24h...? How weird...

User avatar
askropp
Forum Staff
Posts: 7451
Joined: 08 May 2008, 00:42

Re: German High Commanders of WW2

#367

Post by askropp » 27 Jun 2020, 13:28

As it seems, Obstfelder was mstFb for five minutes ... No, seriously, HM is obviously right. I will change the list at once.

test.jpg
There are times in history when staying neutral means taking sides.

Rossano
Member
Posts: 5569
Joined: 26 May 2007, 00:56
Location: Italy

Re: German High Commanders of WW2

#368

Post by Rossano » 27 Jun 2020, 14:03

Gentlemen
I don' t understand, from biograph. sources and unit histories Eberbach 29.8 Kgf. and Brandenberger 29.8 mFb. I' m really puzzled.....
Could it be that the change was registered later (31.8) but it occurred earlier (29.8) ?
Rgds.
P.S. Until when was Dietrich supposed to have been in command (i.V., zgl.) ?

User avatar
askropp
Forum Staff
Posts: 7451
Joined: 08 May 2008, 00:42

Re: German High Commanders of WW2

#369

Post by askropp » 27 Jun 2020, 14:35

I don't know to which sources you are referring, but for me the date of Eberbach's capture was never in question. Of course, it is confirmed by all relevant KTBs. Brandenberger took over on 1 September, just as this thread says on page 22.
There are times in history when staying neutral means taking sides.

User avatar
askropp
Forum Staff
Posts: 7451
Joined: 08 May 2008, 00:42

Re: German High Commanders of WW2

#370

Post by askropp » 09 Jul 2020, 15:05

I posted updates and corrections for:

Flottenkommando
Marinegruppenkommando Ost
Heeresgruppe Nord
AOK 15
AOK 16

The biggest news is that Lindemann was mstFb HGr Nord in October 1943. If somebody is able to support a begin date, please come forward.
There are times in history when staying neutral means taking sides.

User avatar
askropp
Forum Staff
Posts: 7451
Joined: 08 May 2008, 00:42

Re: German High Commanders of WW2

#371

Post by askropp » 23 Nov 2020, 17:15

I just noticed that KTB AOK 4 confirms Hans Reinhardt was mstFb HGr Mitte on 28/29, maybe early 30 October 1943 (between Kluge and Busch).
There are times in history when staying neutral means taking sides.

Rossano
Member
Posts: 5569
Joined: 26 May 2007, 00:56
Location: Italy

Re: German High Commanders of WW2

#372

Post by Rossano » 23 Nov 2020, 18:08

Thanks Askropp
By the way, with regard to the 4.Armee
In Heinrici´s Dienstlaufbahn it is reported that in may 44 he was 4 weeks in Kur, who was his deputy ?
Rgds., Rossano

User avatar
askropp
Forum Staff
Posts: 7451
Joined: 08 May 2008, 00:42

Re: German High Commanders of WW2

#373

Post by askropp » 24 Nov 2020, 21:17

Heinrici's leave began on 5 June, and it is well known that Tippelskirch was his substitute (not "deputy").
There are times in history when staying neutral means taking sides.

Rossano
Member
Posts: 5569
Joined: 26 May 2007, 00:56
Location: Italy

Re: German High Commanders of WW2

#374

Post by Rossano » 24 Nov 2020, 21:58

Thanks, but now I still have one last question regarding Tippelskirch
Mehner too mentions him as substitute but gives his arrival on 14.6 (and GL. Müller as his deputy from 4.6 to 14.6)
Is that possible (and Mehner correct) or maybe Heinrici left before, with Müller as deputy until 4 or 5 june (then Tippelskirch) ? Rgds.

User avatar
askropp
Forum Staff
Posts: 7451
Joined: 08 May 2008, 00:42

Re: German High Commanders of WW2

#375

Post by askropp » 24 Nov 2020, 22:14

Once again, in this context a Stellvertreter is always a substitute and never a "deputy". I don't care what certain people write as long as I have sound reason and the KTB. Do you want to tell me that a Generalleutnant commanded an army over the heads of three full generals and Korps commanders (Tippelskirch, Martinek and Völckers)? This would be ridiculous. Müller was mstFb XII. Armeekorps for Tippelskirch, and that's as high as he ever got (unless we count his later DDR service).
There are times in history when staying neutral means taking sides.

Post Reply

Return to “The Dieter Zinke Axis Biographical Research Section”