Why the Waffen-SS

Discussions on all (non-biographical) aspects of the Freikorps, Reichswehr, Austrian Bundesheer, Heer, Waffen-SS, Volkssturm and Fallschirmjäger and the other Luftwaffe ground forces. Hosted by Christoph Awender.
Post Reply
User avatar
Gorque
Member
Posts: 1662
Joined: 11 Feb 2009, 19:20
Location: Clocktown

Re: Why the Waffen-SS

#2566

Post by Gorque » 17 Jun 2017, 20:40

Sid Guttridge wrote:Hi Michael,

As I understand it, Reitlinger's purpose was to establish the minimum indisputable figure for Jewish deaths, so that future revisionists and deniers would have difficulty quibbling over them.
Hi Sid:

This tactic was also used by the German legal authorities in order to avoid being bogged down with murdered individuals whose whereabouts could not be ascertained with reasonable certainty.

offizier1916
Member
Posts: 368
Joined: 20 Sep 2015, 11:37
Location: the sun

Re: Why the Waffen-SS

#2567

Post by offizier1916 » 22 Jun 2017, 17:10

sry


whelihan
New member
Posts: 1
Joined: 05 Jul 2017, 01:51
Location: germany

Re: Why the Waffen-SS

#2568

Post by whelihan » 09 Jul 2017, 01:51

The fact that there were 38 divisions in SS and the Waffen -SS served along side of the Army.
Seemed very popular then ,just by the numbers of men, taking orders from Himmler.

j keenan
Financial supporter
Posts: 1575
Joined: 04 Jun 2007, 12:22
Location: North

Re: Why the Waffen-SS

#2569

Post by j keenan » 09 Jul 2017, 02:29

There was never 38 Divs ever in the Waffen-SS stop living in fantasy land

User avatar
BillHermann
Member
Posts: 742
Joined: 04 Jan 2012, 16:35
Location: Authie

Re: Why the Waffen-SS

#2570

Post by BillHermann » 09 Jul 2017, 02:53

The other point is that most of the SS divisions were anything but full fledged division you look at when the most were created and what they were composed of including numbers and sub units. Some of the late war SS divisions were a hodgepodge of units some were not SS. I also doubt that there was whole sale praise from the army. Lastly what does Himmler in command of a fighting army have anything to do with this. It was about loyalty and politics when he was put in place near the end not military skill.

j keenan
Financial supporter
Posts: 1575
Joined: 04 Jun 2007, 12:22
Location: North

Re: Why the Waffen-SS

#2571

Post by j keenan » 09 Jul 2017, 09:32

In the end Himmler wasn't that loyal

Pena V
Member
Posts: 792
Joined: 21 Feb 2006, 20:51
Location: Finland

Re: Why the Waffen-SS

#2572

Post by Pena V » 12 Jul 2017, 10:05

Jamie,

There were 38 SS-Divisions or even more if you include 23.D (Kama), 29.D (Russian 1), 30.D (Russian 2) and 33.D (Hungarian 3). We both know that the late SS-Division were weak but thay were called divisions anyway so whelihan is not living in fantasy land.
I agree that in the end Himmler wasn't that loyal.

Regards,

Pena V

j keenan
Financial supporter
Posts: 1575
Joined: 04 Jun 2007, 12:22
Location: North

Re: Why the Waffen-SS

#2573

Post by j keenan » 12 Jul 2017, 11:39

It is living in Fantasy land if you think there were 38 plus Waffen-SS divisions as the latter were little more than reinforced Btls. or battle groups.

User avatar
Ironmachine
Member
Posts: 5822
Joined: 07 Jul 2005, 11:50
Location: Spain

Re: Why the Waffen-SS

#2574

Post by Ironmachine » 12 Jul 2017, 17:30

Pena V wrote:We both know that the late SS-Division were weak but thay were called divisions anyway so whelihan is not living in fantasy land.
Those who named those units as divisions during WWII were certainly living in fantasy land. Whelihan may be living there or not, depending on whether he knows what they really were or not.

Pena V
Member
Posts: 792
Joined: 21 Feb 2006, 20:51
Location: Finland

Re: Why the Waffen-SS

#2575

Post by Pena V » 12 Jul 2017, 22:34

I think Ironmachine's definition is good:
Ironmachine wrote:Those who named those units as divisions during WWII were certainly living in fantasy land.
but because they actually were named divisions why shouldn't we use their correct name instead of calling them for example 38. SS-reinforced-Bataillon or 38. SS-Kampf-Gruppe. That would only add confusion.

Regards,

Pena V

j keenan
Financial supporter
Posts: 1575
Joined: 04 Jun 2007, 12:22
Location: North

Re: Why the Waffen-SS

#2576

Post by j keenan » 12 Jul 2017, 23:40

The Heer had no problem calling them what they were, to use the Walloons as one example.

Pena V
Member
Posts: 792
Joined: 21 Feb 2006, 20:51
Location: Finland

Re: Why the Waffen-SS

#2577

Post by Pena V » 13 Jul 2017, 08:21

Jamie,

I would have no problem calling for example the 38. SS-Grenadier-Division "Niebelungen" a Brigade, a Regiment or a Bataillon if it had been named so but the fact is that it was named a Division and saying that someone is living in fantasy land just because he uses the correct names of the units is nonsense.

Regards,

Pena V

Sid Guttridge
Member
Posts: 10162
Joined: 12 Jun 2008, 12:19

Re: Why the Waffen-SS

#2578

Post by Sid Guttridge » 13 Jul 2017, 14:05

During the war, the Germans had little choice but to refer to their formations and units by the designations given them by their high command. They also had a vested interest in inflating their OB.

However, if we today continue to use these inflated designations without qualification, we are doing accurate history a disservice.

Many of the later W-SS "divisions" were only what used to be known as "mixed brigades". i.e. they contained units of more than one arm, usually an infantry regiment or two and an artillery battalion or batteries.)

Cheers,

Sid.

j keenan
Financial supporter
Posts: 1575
Joined: 04 Jun 2007, 12:22
Location: North

Re: Why the Waffen-SS

#2579

Post by j keenan » 13 Jul 2017, 18:12

As Sid says
However, if we today continue to use these inflated designations without qualification, we are doing accurate history a disservice,and living in a fantasy Waffen-SS land

Pena V
Member
Posts: 792
Joined: 21 Feb 2006, 20:51
Location: Finland

Re: Why the Waffen-SS

#2580

Post by Pena V » 13 Jul 2017, 20:49

We all agree that
Pena V wrote:the late SS-Divisions were weak
This is not an issue. The issue here is that if someone calls them divisions is it right to say that he
j keenan wrote: is living in Fantasy land
How about Axis History Factbook? Under the heading Waffen-SS divisions they list all 38 divisions. Are they too living in Fantasy land? If so who defines which units shoud be called divisions? Jamie? Sid? Somebody else (who)?

Regards,

Pena V

Post Reply

Return to “Heer, Waffen-SS & Fallschirmjäger”