How close to the front line would motorized infantry dismount?

Discussions on all (non-biographical) aspects of the Freikorps, Reichswehr, Austrian Bundesheer, Heer, Waffen-SS, Volkssturm and Fallschirmjäger and the other Luftwaffe ground forces. Hosted by Christoph Awender.
Duncan_M
Member
Posts: 224
Joined: 11 Oct 2018, 16:07
Location: USA

Re: How close to the front line would motorized infantry dismount?

#16

Post by Duncan_M » 11 Sep 2019, 17:11

Sheldrake wrote:
11 Sep 2019, 10:50
Guderian was the commander of a Panzer Army, that provided one arm of the pincers that encircled Soviet forces in the pockets of 1941 that netted some 3,000,000 PW. There were other panzer and infantry armies. These were huge operations spread over areas bigger than some US States. How was a single army commander responsible for the operations of an army group? Which orders did Guderian disobey that allowed the Red army to escape? Are you for real or is this a wind up?
There were well over a dozen other generals who commanded panzer armies throughout the war, anyone of them could have done what Guderian did in 1941, especially considering Panzer Gruppe Guderian was the strongest of all four. Had he followed orders and been a team player they'd have netted even more POWs. Guderian blatantly disobeyed Bock and Kluge (at the short time he was placed in command of both Hoth and Guderian) especially during the battle of Smolensk, when Guderian refused to close the encirclement and instead pressed out, on his own initiative, to Yelnya.

Go read David Stahel's Operation Barbarossa and Germany's Defeat in the East, about half the book is Guderian disobeying superiors and doing his own thing.

User avatar
Harro
Member
Posts: 3233
Joined: 19 May 2005, 19:10
Location: The Netherlands

Re: How close to the front line would motorized infantry dismount?

#17

Post by Harro » 11 Sep 2019, 21:38

Sarge3525 wrote:
04 Sep 2019, 13:53
Let's also not forget the German kradschuetzen (motorcycle sharpshooters) with the guy in the side-car with an MG.
In video footage they show them going full speed, swerving, and gunning at the same time, and dismounting at the last moment and using the inertia to continue the infantry assault.
Kradschützen were no "sharpshooters". They were simply light infantry mounted on motorcycle-combinations intended mainly for reconnaissance tasks.


User avatar
Sheldrake
Member
Posts: 3727
Joined: 28 Apr 2013, 18:14
Location: London
Contact:

Re: How close to the front line would motorized infantry dismount?

#18

Post by Sheldrake » 08 Nov 2019, 00:10

Duncan_M wrote:
11 Sep 2019, 17:11
Sheldrake wrote:
11 Sep 2019, 10:50
Guderian was the commander of a Panzer Army, that provided one arm of the pincers that encircled Soviet forces in the pockets of 1941 that netted some 3,000,000 PW. There were other panzer and infantry armies. These were huge operations spread over areas bigger than some US States. How was a single army commander responsible for the operations of an army group? Which orders did Guderian disobey that allowed the Red army to escape? Are you for real or is this a wind up?
There were well over a dozen other generals who commanded panzer armies throughout the war, anyone of them could have done what Guderian did in 1941, especially considering Panzer Gruppe Guderian was the strongest of all four. Had he followed orders and been a team player they'd have netted even more POWs. Guderian blatantly disobeyed Bock and Kluge (at the short time he was placed in command of both Hoth and Guderian) especially during the battle of Smolensk, when Guderian refused to close the encirclement and instead pressed out, on his own initiative, to Yelnya.

Go read David Stahel's Operation Barbarossa and Germany's Defeat in the East, about half the book is Guderian disobeying superiors and doing his own thing.
I have now read David Stahel's book. He obviously despises all of the German Generals and has little empathy with the problems they faced. I found his sneering tone grating after a while and struggled to finish the book. (a rare experience) We know that the Germans woefully under estimated the resilience of USSR. His book is a long series of repetitions of this single theme. The repetitive footnotes pointing out the complicity of the German Generals in Nazi war crimes is a case in point. Some of his criticisms are dubious.

It is not true to claim that capturing Moscow was impossible in 1941. We will never know. They came pretty close even after the diversion to Kiev.

He claims that the VIII Air Corps were incompetent for losing 10% of their strength as losses and 50% needing repairs over a two week period. But that loss rate looks reasonable. Losing 10% from one sortie is too high. But over two weeks from a force of close support aircraft? Isn't it the same as a very reasonable 1% loss rate per day for ten days?

His claims that the German armour should have done more to round up PW seems at odds with what i understand about manoeuvre warfare.

Returning to the point we were discussing. Yes there were lots of Panzer Generals. Guderian was one of the best known - largely for his expertise. His leadership and disobedience was key to the success of the 1940 campaign. Do read Frieser's semi official The Blitzkrieg legend. You might not think him special but the Bundeswehr clearly do.

ROLAND1369
Member
Posts: 1403
Joined: 26 May 2007, 16:22
Location: USA

Re: How close to the front line would motorized infantry dismount?

#19

Post by ROLAND1369 » 10 Nov 2019, 16:09

In response to the initial question I was taught as a young US infantry Lieutenant in Mechanized infantry, M 113 APC, the guidance was both simple and practical. The dismount point was to be the last covered( the point at which the the enemy cannot bring direct weapons fire on the unit) and or the last concealed(point at which the enemy has no direct observation) area.

Post Reply

Return to “Heer, Waffen-SS & Fallschirmjäger”