USSR was basically irrelevant in ww2
USSR was basically irrelevant in ww2
Romania joined the axis to defend against the Soviets. Before then it was allied aligned.
Without USSR Romania and Germany would just kill each other. War would end sooner. The bulk of Axis forces in the east were Romanians and Finn's and both were just there because of the USSR.
Without USSR Romania and Germany would just kill each other. War would end sooner. The bulk of Axis forces in the east were Romanians and Finn's and both were just there because of the USSR.
-
- Financial supporter
- Posts: 5668
- Joined: 16 May 2010, 15:12
- Location: United States of America
Re: USSR was basically irrelevant in ww2
Would you let us all in on what you're smoking. You know, for those times that even a triple won't do.
Re: USSR was basically irrelevant in ww2
I'll bite.
Numbers of the respective combatants?
Numbers of the respective combatants?
Re: USSR was basically irrelevant in ww2
At Stalingrad, by Wikipedia:
400k Germans
200k each Romania/Hungary/Italy
As you can see Germany wasn't the majority. Without it's allies it's be pretty screwed. Italy joined the Allies anyways, Hungary was unreliable, Romania was allied until the Soviets.
Re: USSR was basically irrelevant in ww2
Kool:
I'll now let those members with greater knowledge of military matters abuse you.
Now if you'll excuse me, I've got a Civ 6 game waiting to entertain me and the future responses to your crazy posts to amuse in the future.
Where's the pop-corn?
I'll now let those members with greater knowledge of military matters abuse you.
Now if you'll excuse me, I've got a Civ 6 game waiting to entertain me and the future responses to your crazy posts to amuse in the future.
Where's the pop-corn?
Re: USSR was basically irrelevant in ww2
I mean you can also consider the Dnieper Offensive, Soviet invasion of Romania and others considering this ewere huge parts of the war and also how the Axis utterly collapsed when Romania switched...
Re: USSR was basically irrelevant in ww2
Oh,God,again...
-
- Forum Staff
- Posts: 23724
- Joined: 20 Jul 2002, 20:52
- Location: USA
Re: USSR was basically irrelevant in ww2
This thread is locked for multiple violations of our forum rules.
mustang19 -- You can consider this as your warning.
If a poster stops asking questions and begins to express a point of view, he then becomes an advocate for that viewpoint. When a person becomes an advocate, he has the burden of providing evidence for his point of view. If he has no evidence, or doesn't provide it when asked, it is reasonable for the reader to conclude that his opinion or viewpoint is uninformed and may fairly be discounted or rejected.
Undocumented claims undercut the research purposes of this section of the forum. Consequently, it is required that proof be posted along with a claim. The main reason is that proof, evidence, facts, etc. improve the quality of discussions and information. A second reason is that inflammatory, groundless posts and threads attack, and do not promote, the scholarly purpose of this section of the forum.
This requirement applies to each specific claim. In the past, some posters have attempted to evade the proof requirement by resort to the following tactics, none of which are acceptable here:
A general reference to a website, or a book without page references; citations or links to racist websites; generalized citations to book reviews; and citations to unsourced, secondary articles or opinions.
Noncomplying posts are subject to deletion after warning.
3. Opinions
Since the purpose of this section of the forum is to exchange information and hold informed discussions about historical problems, posts which express unsolicited opinions without supporting facts and sources do not promote the purposes of the forum. Consequently, such posts are subject to deletion after a warning to the poster.
The same reasoning applies to opinion threads.
app.php/rules8. Miscellaneous
1. Discussions
The research sections of the forum are meant for persons who are fairly well-informed on the topics being discussed, and our discussions are not directed at the lowest common denominator of readership. Rural customs of discourse, such as feigned ignorance, pettifogging, playing at peek-a-boo, fact-free repartee, redundant and uninformative posts, and/or "stonewalling" denials of facts well-known to most informed persons, are strongly disfavored here.
The object of the research sections of the forum is to exchange information, not to engage in dim wrangling as a form of diversion. Our readers are intelligent people, who have already taken the time to inform themselves on the topic under discussion and don't have a lot of time to waste playing games. Shrill and highly polemical posts are also strongly disfavored.
mustang19 -- You can consider this as your warning.