Betriebsstoffmeldung - cbm or tonnes?

Discussions on all (non-biographical) aspects of the Freikorps, Reichswehr, Austrian Bundesheer, Heer, Waffen-SS, Volkssturm and Fallschirmjäger and the other Luftwaffe ground forces. Hosted by Christoph Awender.
User avatar
Urmel
Member
Posts: 4698
Joined: 25 Aug 2008 09:34
Location: The late JBond

Betriebsstoffmeldung - cbm or tonnes?

Post by Urmel » 28 Dec 2022 17:33

Does anyone know the reporting units here?

I suspect it is cubic metres, but I have seen the same reports using tonnes and cbm

Many thanks in advance!
Screenshot 2022-12-28 at 5.31.32 PM.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
The enemy had superiority in numbers, his tanks were more heavily armoured, they had larger calibre guns with nearly twice the effective range of ours, and their telescopes were superior. 5 RTR 19/11/41

The CRUSADER Project - The Winter Battle 1941/42

User avatar
kfbr392
Member
Posts: 530
Joined: 24 Jun 2004 16:05
Location: Germany

Re: Betriebsstoffmeldung - cbm or tonnes?

Post by kfbr392 » 28 Dec 2022 18:52

Jeez, how about a less close crop?

User avatar
Urmel
Member
Posts: 4698
Joined: 25 Aug 2008 09:34
Location: The late JBond

Re: Betriebsstoffmeldung - cbm or tonnes?

Post by Urmel » 28 Dec 2022 22:59

There's nothing in the document that would indicate the units. I'll make the document available eventually.
The enemy had superiority in numbers, his tanks were more heavily armoured, they had larger calibre guns with nearly twice the effective range of ours, and their telescopes were superior. 5 RTR 19/11/41

The CRUSADER Project - The Winter Battle 1941/42

Return to “Heer, Waffen-SS & Fallschirmjäger”