Infantry Tank Support

Discussions on all (non-biographical) aspects of the Freikorps, Reichswehr, Austrian Bundesheer, Heer, Waffen-SS, Volkssturm and Fallschirmjäger and the other Luftwaffe ground forces. Hosted by Christoph Awender.
A-Bomb
Member
Posts: 337
Joined: 11 Sep 2002, 13:14
Location: USA

Infantry Tank Support

#1

Post by A-Bomb » 13 Sep 2002, 01:09

Ok. How did infantry divisions get tank support? Did they just intermingle with an armored division? Like overlapping? I am wondering about all military forces on this question, not just the Germans.

User avatar
Daniel L
Member
Posts: 9122
Joined: 07 Sep 2002, 01:46
Location: Sweden

#2

Post by Daniel L » 13 Sep 2002, 03:11

Most had integral tank units other had attached independant tank units. The units were often sent where the division commander wanted a breaktrough or were the fighting were hard. Tactically one should always use the tank units where the enemys weakest points are. Hope this answer your question.


A-Bomb
Member
Posts: 337
Joined: 11 Sep 2002, 13:14
Location: USA

#3

Post by A-Bomb » 13 Sep 2002, 03:27

hmmm. So they were attached? Say for example the US 29th Infantry needed tank support, would they get like a tank group from 2nd Armored or something like that?

User avatar
johnny_bi
Member
Posts: 228
Joined: 10 Sep 2002, 08:24
Location: Romania

#4

Post by johnny_bi » 13 Sep 2002, 08:11

The french army had the tanks spread within the infantry .... That's why they lost the war in may '40 . The germans made huge tank concentrations , so even if the french tanks were often better than germans' , especially Char 1 bis, the germans succeded in defeat french army . in Russia I think there were armoured troups supported by infantry :D .
The difference between armies were made by the difference between tactics in this matter . Germans had Stugs as armoured support , some of them were specialized in killing tanks and others in killing infantry .
The americans and british ... I do not know ...
It would be better that someone with good knowlegement would talk about :oops:

Bogdan(BI)

User avatar
Nicklas Fredriksson
Member
Posts: 31
Joined: 09 Aug 2002, 15:48
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden

#5

Post by Nicklas Fredriksson » 13 Sep 2002, 11:15

I'll try and shed some light on this subject... 8)

The timeframe here is from 1943 onwards and we're talking ETO here!
If anything is wrong please correct it!
Note also the old adage "No rules without exceptions!". :D

Germans: normally the infantry divisions wouldn't get tank support. They could have integral PzJs/Jpzs or StuGs (usually only a kp). They could get PzJs/Jpzs or StuGs attached or, rarely, Pz from Korps (usually Abt).

Russians: normally the rifle divisions wouldn't get tank support. They could have integral SUs (a single company?). They could get SUs or tanks attached from corps (bat or brigade).

British incl Canadians (and ANZAC?): the infantry divisions had no integral tanks. It was common to have either an Armour (Shermans) or a Tank (Churchills) brigade attached (e a 3 bats) and possibly SPAT (bat) could be attached. All from corps.

Americans: the infantry officially had no integral tanks. IT was common to have one or more Armour bat and one or more TD (towed or SP) bat attached on a semi-permanent basis. All from corps.

Kind rgds
Nick

A-Bomb
Member
Posts: 337
Joined: 11 Sep 2002, 13:14
Location: USA

#6

Post by A-Bomb » 13 Sep 2002, 13:31

How about German Panzergrenadiers? Did they have tanks? About the USA, if say a US INFANTRY batallion ran into an Armored Batallion, were they screwed?

User avatar
mdx
Member
Posts: 49
Joined: 09 Sep 2002, 16:48
Location: Taiwan
Contact:

#7

Post by mdx » 13 Sep 2002, 14:11

German Infanterie-Division did not have integral tank battalion. The only full-motorized battalion was Panzerjaeger-Abteilung, the anti-tank battalion. The battalion had three motorized anti-tank companies and one motorized anti-aircraft company in the early war year. As the time went by they received more effective weapons such as StuG or Hetzer. The division did get some armor support from higher command level, the Korps or Armee, most of them were independent StuG-Bataillon.

US infantry division also did not have integral tank battalion. But all of them received one independent tank battalion attached to them. Besides they also had a tank destroyer battalion.

German Panzergrenadier-Division was upgraded from previous Infanterie-Division (motorisiert). The division did receive one Panzer-Abteilung, most of them equipped with Panzer III or Panzer IV initially. Most of them were re-equipped with StuG as replacements in late war year. Few of them remained real Panzer-Abteilung (Panzer IV or even Panzer V). The exceptions were GD Panzergrenadier-Division and her sister divisions. Although in the name of Panzergrenadier-Division they had nearly the same combat strength as Heer Panzer-Division especially in late war year.

User avatar
johnny_bi
Member
Posts: 228
Joined: 10 Sep 2002, 08:24
Location: Romania

#8

Post by johnny_bi » 13 Sep 2002, 14:14

As far as I know panzergrenadieres had not tanks even if their name include "panzer" word... they got that name during the war ... the infantry division were renamed panzergrenadiers (their AT capabilities really increased :) ) much for psychological and historical reason ...
or am I wrong ? :oops:

BI

User avatar
Daniel L
Member
Posts: 9122
Joined: 07 Sep 2002, 01:46
Location: Sweden

#9

Post by Daniel L » 13 Sep 2002, 14:57

johnny bi-your wrong. panzergrenadier divisions was not upgraded infantry. they had another kind of composition, tactical deployment, vehicles etc.

User avatar
Qvist
Member
Posts: 7836
Joined: 11 Mar 2002, 17:59
Location: Europe

#10

Post by Qvist » 13 Sep 2002, 15:30

Nicklas basically has this right, as far as my knowledge stretches. The only thing I'd add is this - didn't the Soviet army have Tank Brigades who were occasionally deployed in support of Rifle divisions?

Now, Panzer Grenadiers: The term originally denoted the motorised infantry of the Panzer divisions. At the same time, the wehrmacht contained a number of motorised infantry divisions. These were not called Panzer Grenadiers, and were - in nomenclature - only distinguished from normal infantry by the appendix "(mot.)" after the divisional number. An Infanterie-division (mot.) was relatively similar to a normal infantry division in structure, except that it had just two infantry regiments and were fully motorised.

However, from one point in the war onwards, I believe in 1943, the motorised divisions were all renamed Panzer Grenadier divisions. These normally eventually included a StuG batallion, and were relatively similar to a Panzer division in structure, except they had the StuG batallion rather than a Panzer rgt, and 3 batallions per PzGren Rgt rather than 2 as in the Pz divisions.

cheers

User avatar
Nicklas Fredriksson
Member
Posts: 31
Joined: 09 Aug 2002, 15:48
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden

#11

Post by Nicklas Fredriksson » 13 Sep 2002, 15:31

Just to clarify to Johnny:

Panzer grenadiers were either motorised or mechanised infantry in the PzD and PzGrD.

Panzergrenadier divisions were either 1) upgraded motorised divisions, ie as specified by Charlie in his post above or 2) the "named" divisions 1942-43 (for example GD and some of the Waffen-SS divisions) before they were officially named panzerdivisions, ie to all effects they were panzerdivisions although not labeled as such.

Kind rgds
Nick

A-Bomb
Member
Posts: 337
Joined: 11 Sep 2002, 13:14
Location: USA

#12

Post by A-Bomb » 13 Sep 2002, 16:13

So as a whole, did infantry get good tank support?(german and US)

User avatar
Qvist
Member
Posts: 7836
Joined: 11 Mar 2002, 17:59
Location: Europe

#13

Post by Qvist » 13 Sep 2002, 16:28

As a whole - the Germans no, the US yes.

Recall that there were fundamental differences in the structure of the two armies. The americans built a force of less than 100 divisions and supported all of it with motorised and armoured means. The Germans, with enormous territorial commitments, maintained an army of 2-300 divisions from a much smaller industrial base. It was simply not possible for them to support such a large force in the same way. So basically they built two separate types of forces: Infantry divisions relying on foot and horse, with very limited armoured and motorised assets available for support, and mobile Panzer and Panzer Grenadier divisions with a level of motorised and armoured assets comparable to the US. Unlike American formations, they overwhelmingly had these assets as organic elements of the divisions. And while the percentage of motorised formations in the Wehrmacht was never very high, they did at their peak maintain some 50 such divisions.

cheers

cheers

User avatar
mdx
Member
Posts: 49
Joined: 09 Sep 2002, 16:48
Location: Taiwan
Contact:

#14

Post by mdx » 13 Sep 2002, 19:04

Motorized infantry in Panzergrenadier-Division and Panzer-Division

The term "Panzergrenadier" was issued on the Heeresmitteilung (army announcement) 1942/581 from OKH 4490/42. Generalstab des Heeres (general staff of army), Org.Abt.(II) (organization department) to replace the term "Schuetzen" in motorized infantry element in Panzer-Division on 5th July 1942. The previous Schuetzen-Regiment was retitled with the name Panzergrenadier-Regiment. However, the Panzergrenadier-Regiment in the Panzer-Division was not all gepanzeriert (armorized, that means riding on SPW251). Only one of the four Panzergrenadier-Bataillon was riding on SPW251 on the average among Panzer-Division. The other three were so-called "Gummi Panzergrenadier" (rubber Panzergrenadier, that means riding on soft skin vehicles). Although these "Gummi Panzergrenadier" received the same training of tank-infantry cooperation tactics, they lacked the cross-country ability, protection and fire power to join the Panzer-Abteilung for major strike.

The Infanterie-Division (mot.) was converted to Panzergrenadier-Division as late as 23rd June 1943 after the reorganization of Panzertruppen by Guderian. That means the new Panzergrenadier-Division was no longer under the control of Infanterietruppen and was reassigned to Panzertruppen. The same rule also applied to the Panzergrenadier-Regiment in Panzer-Division. Only two of them was reverted to ordinary foot Infanterie-Division, the 14. and 36. Although the new Panzergrenadier-Division all received one Panzer-Abteilung (actually StuG in most cases), their Grenadier-Regiment (mot.) were all riding on soft skin vehicles. Thus further hampered their ability as a offensive role.

Some elite motorized divisions were another long story, like GD, senior Waffen-SS divisions, LSSAH, DR, T, W and Luftwaffe HG. They were gradually expansion from Infanterie-Division (mot.) to Panzergrenadier-Division and finally Panzer-Division (except GD and HG, GD remained the name of Panzergrenadier until the end; and HG bypassed the step of Panzergrenadier). These elite divivsions had 2 to 3 Panzer-Abteilung plus 6 Panzergrenadier-Bataillon, some of them had two Panzergrenadier-Bataillon riding on SPW251. Thus made them a formidable fighting unit.

A-Bomb
Member
Posts: 337
Joined: 11 Sep 2002, 13:14
Location: USA

#15

Post by A-Bomb » 13 Sep 2002, 22:29

So was a Panzer Division 1/2 motorized infantry 1/2 tanks?
Lets say like Saving Priavte Ryan, in the end they were fighting the 2nd SS Paner Division right? They had infantry and tanks.

Post Reply

Return to “Heer, Waffen-SS & Fallschirmjäger”