I've come to a conclusion that Tiger 214 knocked out in Jort must be the original 214 and it is not a former 1st Company vehicle. One can plainly see that the battalion's symbol is exactly in the same place so it must be the same tank.
This of course ruins the thesis that the Tiger Warmbrunn used north of the Odon is 214.
Then which Tiger is it? 205 has a single sight hole, 204 has a battalion's symbol painted directly on the Zimmerit, 211 has one sight hole, 212 was for sure knocked out in Villers Bocage, 214 was knocked out in Jort, 231 was knocled out in bourgebous, 232 has a large zimmerit. All the Tigers of the 2nd platoon of the 2nd company can be excluded aswell as this platoon didn't remove Zimmerit in place of the battalion's symbol.
What is left are 213, 233 and 234. I would exclude 213 so it's either 233 or 234.
Now about this Tiger.
As I wrote before I'm nearly sure that the digit in the middle is a "1" so it comes from the 1st platoon of the 2nd Company.
It can't be 212 (knocked out in V-B) and it can't be 214 (knocked out in Jort). What is left are 211 and 213. The battalion's symbol is nearly in the same place as in the 211. But the photos of a good quality reveal that there is a difference.
Here are two pictures of 211.
And this is another shot of 211 in my opinion.
The camoflauged Tiger has a battalion's symbol in exactly the same place. What is more it has a single sight hole just like 211 and it appears to me that we can see a white digit painted on the turret ("2"). The camo stains on the right hand look the same. Those on the left appear to be different but it might be a question of the photo. Anyway the battalion's symbol is in the same place.
If this camoflauged tiger is 211 then the one without tracks can't be 211. The square is nearly in the same place but the symbol is more to the right.
So the wreck without the tracks is most probably Hauptscharführer Höfflinger's 213.
In his account concerning 8th August Höfflinger says that he was driving west of the Caen-Falaise road more less parallel to the Wittmann's 007. Canadian veteran Radley-Waters wrote that they knocked out two Tigers south of Gaumesnil. One was slightly to the east of the road (mos probably Wittmann's) and the other one was in the rear and it stood directly on the road. Most probably that particular Tiger was Höfflinger's.
It is interesting that we can't see a Tiger standing on the road in the aerial photos. there is a simple explanation: it must have been removed by the allies as it blocked the road. The locals say that there was a wreck standing west of St Aignan. This is weird as this statement places that Tiger wreck in the middle of the allied lines. But maybe that tank was left there by the allies and maybe it was Höfflinger's.
The wreck without the tracks wasn't destroyed in the position that can be seen in the picture but it was towed and left like that.
Höfflinger's account provides no answer about the damages that his Tiger suffered. But it is likely that it received some hits directly in the frontal armor as it was exposing its frontal armor to the Shermans in Gaumesnil. The Tiger I think is 213 has such damages.
Finally 213 is the Tiger that Höfflinger used in June.
And one more thing. My scans don't show that the camo stains on 211 and on the camoflauged Tiger are the same. But whe I watch those photos in the book using a magnyfying glass I can plainly see that the camo is identical. Those who have some books with those pics in very good quality may check themselves.