Seelöwe - German & British mining operations
Re: Seelöwe - German & British mining operations
The point about the floaters is that they were not necessarily from any minefields laid just a few days before, as certain posters appear to believe - they might have broken loose weeks or months ago and they might have come from just about anywhere. For all we know, in the Channel such floaters might stay around for a (very) long time, moving back and forth with the tides and currents.
According to Peter Elliot, Allied Minesweeping in WW2, p. 24: "Floating mines could be found far out into the North Atlantic and drifted right across the Pacific to the western coast of the United States."
So there's nothing much the Kriegsmarine could have done to "minimise the problem" as suggested above.
(And yes, I know the western coast of the United States is not the Channel, no need to point that out)
According to Peter Elliot, Allied Minesweeping in WW2, p. 24: "Floating mines could be found far out into the North Atlantic and drifted right across the Pacific to the western coast of the United States."
So there's nothing much the Kriegsmarine could have done to "minimise the problem" as suggested above.
(And yes, I know the western coast of the United States is not the Channel, no need to point that out)
"The true spirit of conversation consists in building on another man's observation, not overturning it." Edward George Bulwer-Lytton
Re: Seelöwe - German & British mining operations
From a BBC "WW2 People's War" interview with somebody who as a boy escaped from France (http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/ww2peoples ... 9986.shtml ):
"We sailed from Dunkirk on the 21st May, 1940 at around 3 to 4pm, skirting the French coast towards Calais which we found to be burning furiously. We then set out for the open sea following a mine free channel. We did come across two or three floating mines and these were exploded by a marksman from our ship."
"We sailed from Dunkirk on the 21st May, 1940 at around 3 to 4pm, skirting the French coast towards Calais which we found to be burning furiously. We then set out for the open sea following a mine free channel. We did come across two or three floating mines and these were exploded by a marksman from our ship."
"The true spirit of conversation consists in building on another man's observation, not overturning it." Edward George Bulwer-Lytton
- phylo_roadking
- Member
- Posts: 17488
- Joined: 01 May 2006, 00:31
- Location: Belfast
Re: Seelöwe - German & British mining operations
A total misrepresentation....not to say misunderstanding...of the point; if mines are not there they can't break free. Therefore, laying them at the closest possible time to S-Day reduces the amount of time available for said mines to break free.Knouterer wrote:The point about the floaters is that they were not necessarily from any minefields laid just a few days before, as certain posters appear to believe - they might have broken loose weeks or months ago and they might have come from just about anywhere. For all we know, in the Channel such floaters might stay around for a (very) long time, moving back and forth with the tides and currents.
According to Peter Elliot, Allied Minesweeping in WW2, p. 24: "Floating mines could be found far out into the North Atlantic and drifted right across the Pacific to the western coast of the United States."
So there's nothing much the Kriegsmarine could have done to "minimise the problem" as suggested above.
Of course they would continue to break free during and after the invasion - no one has said they wouldn't - but if x-number a day on average break free, you can reduce the number doing so before S-Day by reducing the number of days they're actually in the water beforehand.
They don't break free and float down into the mapped invasion channels when they sitting in railcars in France...
Twenty years ago we had Johnny Cash, Bob Hope and Steve Jobs. Now we have no Cash, no Hope and no Jobs....
Lord, please keep Kevin Bacon alive...
Lord, please keep Kevin Bacon alive...
Re: Seelöwe - German & British mining operations
Knouterer wrote:The point about the floaters is that they were not necessarily from any minefields laid just a few days before, as certain posters appear to believe - they might have broken loose weeks or months ago and they might have come from just about anywhere.
As you say, random floating mines could be found at almost any time,
it was less than ten years ago the last mine where found on the Swedish West coast.
But the mines did not break free by design, but by mechanical failures.
And to my undertanding, a sigificant part of the failures happend at laying,
thereafter the mines where floating in a fairly stable environment until the next storm, when some more would break loose.
Ofcourse some mines would randomly break loose at any time but the probablity was low.
Cheers
/John.
Re: Seelöwe - German & British mining operations
Err, what about floaters from the extensive minefields already laid?phylo_roadking wrote:A total misrepresentation....not to say misunderstanding...of the point; if mines are not there they can't break free. Therefore, laying them at the closest possible time to S-Day reduces the amount of time available for said mines to break free.Knouterer wrote:The point about the floaters is that they were not necessarily from any minefields laid just a few days before, as certain posters appear to believe - they might have broken loose weeks or months ago and they might have come from just about anywhere. For all we know, in the Channel such floaters might stay around for a (very) long time, moving back and forth with the tides and currents.
According to Peter Elliot, Allied Minesweeping in WW2, p. 24: "Floating mines could be found far out into the North Atlantic and drifted right across the Pacific to the western coast of the United States."
So there's nothing much the Kriegsmarine could have done to "minimise the problem" as suggested above.
Of course they would continue to break free during and after the invasion - no one has said they wouldn't - but if x-number a day on average break free, you can reduce the number doing so before S-Day by reducing the number of days they're actually in the water beforehand.
They don't break free and float down into the mapped invasion channels when they sitting in railcars in France...
The enemy had superiority in numbers, his tanks were more heavily armoured, they had larger calibre guns with nearly twice the effective range of ours, and their telescopes were superior. 5 RTR 19/11/41
The CRUSADER Project - The Winter Battle 1941/42
The CRUSADER Project - The Winter Battle 1941/42
- phylo_roadking
- Member
- Posts: 17488
- Joined: 01 May 2006, 00:31
- Location: Belfast
Re: Seelöwe - German & British mining operations
Err, what about floaters from the extensive minefields already laid?
And of course - Sealion isn't going to be launched if there's anything like that on the weather horizon anyway....or at least as far as the Germans could forecast.John T wrote:As you say, random floating mines could be found at almost any time,
it was less than ten years ago the last mine where found on the Swedish West coast.
But the mines did not break free by design, but by mechanical failures.
And to my undertanding, a sigificant part of the failures happend at laying,
thereafter the mines where floating in a fairly stable environment until the next storm, when some more would break loose.
Of course some mines would randomly break loose at any time but the probablity was low.
Cheers
/John.
But as has been discussed before, the Germans knew there was a problem with mines breaking free, including their own. They were obviously prepared to accept the average number of floaters...given that they still ran coastal convoys through potentially affected waters, chains of barges, nighttime e-boat sorties etc...
Also, as well as being obviously prepared to accept the average number of break-frees and floaters, there's something about the German plans for laying their minefields for Sealion that no one seems to have noticed...So there's nothing much the Kriegsmarine could have done to "minimise the problem" as suggested above.
Twenty years ago we had Johnny Cash, Bob Hope and Steve Jobs. Now we have no Cash, no Hope and no Jobs....
Lord, please keep Kevin Bacon alive...
Lord, please keep Kevin Bacon alive...
- Juha Tompuri
- Forum Staff
- Posts: 11562
- Joined: 11 Sep 2002, 21:02
- Location: Mylsä
Re: Seelöwe - German & British mining operations
When/if you or someone else notices it, please post it here.phylo_roadking wrote: there's something about the German plans for laying their minefields for Sealion that no one seems to have noticed
"Information not shared, is lost", as it is used to say.
Regards, Juha
- phylo_roadking
- Member
- Posts: 17488
- Joined: 01 May 2006, 00:31
- Location: Belfast
Re: Seelöwe - German & British mining operations
It's not lost, it's on page 333 of Peter Schenk's book...for those who grasp what the table is telling them...Juha Tompuri wrote:When/if you or someone else notices it, please post it here.phylo_roadking wrote: there's something about the German plans for laying their minefields for Sealion that no one seems to have noticed
"Information not shared, is lost", as it is used to say.
Regards, Juha
....as one thing the Kriegsmarine most definitely could consider doing was - schedule the minelayings they planned so that the up-Channel ones were laid as close to S-Day as practical, reducing further the number of breakaways and floaters from the "new" fields that have time to break free and come down the Channel into the invasion routes.So there's nothing much the Kriegsmarine could have done to "minimise the problem" as suggested above.
Fields D2/D1 were to be laid down-Channel on S -9, fields A2/A1 on S -8...
But the first up-Channel field above the Narrows, C2, wasn't to be laid until S -6...with no more laid above the Narrows until field C3 on S -4. Followed by another two-day gap until fields C1/C1A on S -2.
In other words - up-Channel of the invasion routes, the 400 mines of field C2 would only be in the water for six days before S-Day...followed by the 400 mines of field C3 which would only be in the water for four days before S-Day...while the 495 (total) mines of fields C1 and C1A would only be in the water for two days before S-Day.
So - not only a very narrow time window for a daily average of break-frees and floaters to threaten the invasion routes...a very narrow time window for bad weather to occur and cause greater than average break-frees and floaters.
Twenty years ago we had Johnny Cash, Bob Hope and Steve Jobs. Now we have no Cash, no Hope and no Jobs....
Lord, please keep Kevin Bacon alive...
Lord, please keep Kevin Bacon alive...
- Juha Tompuri
- Forum Staff
- Posts: 11562
- Joined: 11 Sep 2002, 21:02
- Location: Mylsä
Re: Seelöwe - German & British mining operations
"Lost" for those who do not have access to that book/page.phylo_roadking wrote:It's not lost, it's on page 333 of Peter Schenk's book...for those who grasp what the table is telling them...Juha Tompuri wrote:When/if you or someone else notices it, please post it here.phylo_roadking wrote: there's something about the German plans for laying their minefields for Sealion that no one seems to have noticed
"Information not shared, is lost", as it is used to say.
Regards, Juha
And "lost", if someone who has knowledge about the alleged something about the German plans for laying their minefields for Sealion that no one seems to have noticed, and not shares it.
Regards, Juha
- phylo_roadking
- Member
- Posts: 17488
- Joined: 01 May 2006, 00:31
- Location: Belfast
Re: Seelöwe - German & British mining operations
Which is why indeed I went on to share it in detail.And "lost", if someone who has knowledge about the alleged something about the German plans for laying their minefields for Sealion that no one seems to have noticed, and not shares it.
Unfortunately, we'll now never know if it happened to escape any other other contributors to this thread.
Just to recapitulate - no one has ever said that the Germans could reduce the problem of floaters to zero. But they were aware of the problem...and whether intentional or not...their scheduling of minelayings was going to work to minimise the number of break-frees and floaters that on average could come down into the Channel Narrows through S -1.
One interesting aspect of the "invasion summer" of 1940 was that residents on the English coast were VERY aware of frequent loud explosions and reports and put them down to floating mines - see "The Real Home Guard" (not the Norman Longmate book, but the diaries of Col (Indian Army, rtd.) Rodney Foster. By day and by night. So close or distant explosions wasn't necessarily going to cause any undue alarm onshore...
Last edited by phylo_roadking on 21 Mar 2015, 23:29, edited 1 time in total.
Twenty years ago we had Johnny Cash, Bob Hope and Steve Jobs. Now we have no Cash, no Hope and no Jobs....
Lord, please keep Kevin Bacon alive...
Lord, please keep Kevin Bacon alive...
- Juha Tompuri
- Forum Staff
- Posts: 11562
- Joined: 11 Sep 2002, 21:02
- Location: Mylsä
Re: Seelöwe - German & British mining operations
but you just mentioned no-one had noticed?phylo_roadking wrote:Which is why indeed I went on to share it in detail.And "lost", if someone who has knowledge about the alleged something about the German plans for laying their minefields for Sealion that no one seems to have noticed, and not shares it.
phylo_roadking wrote:there's something about the German plans for laying their minefields for Sealion that no one seems to have noticed...
Anyway, about sharing in detail, you have mentoned about a table:
Could you post it, so that we could try to grasp what it would tell to us?It's not lost, it's on page 333 of Peter Schenk's book...for those who grasp what the table is telling them...
Regards, Juha
- phylo_roadking
- Member
- Posts: 17488
- Joined: 01 May 2006, 00:31
- Location: Belfast
Re: Seelöwe - German & British mining operations
No, I said that no one seemed to have noticed. As no one had passed comment on it previously.but you just mentioned no-one had noticed?
If I could scan it I would most certainly post it here.Anyway, about sharing in detail, you have mentoned about a table:
...
Could you post it, so that we could try to grasp what it would tell to us?
Twenty years ago we had Johnny Cash, Bob Hope and Steve Jobs. Now we have no Cash, no Hope and no Jobs....
Lord, please keep Kevin Bacon alive...
Lord, please keep Kevin Bacon alive...
- Juha Tompuri
- Forum Staff
- Posts: 11562
- Joined: 11 Sep 2002, 21:02
- Location: Mylsä
Re: Seelöwe - German & British mining operations
No-one or no-one else?phylo_roadking wrote:No, I said that no one seemed to have noticed.but you just mentioned no-one had noticed?
Thanks for sharing that information.phylo_roadking wrote:If I could scan it I would most certainly post it here.Juha wrote:Anyway, about sharing in detail, you have mentoned about a table:
...
Could you post it, so that we could try to grasp what it would tell to us?
Regards, Juha
- phylo_roadking
- Member
- Posts: 17488
- Joined: 01 May 2006, 00:31
- Location: Belfast
Re: Seelöwe - German & British mining operations
...but as I can't scan it, we'll have to do with a scan previously posted some years ago now on Armchair general...
Twenty years ago we had Johnny Cash, Bob Hope and Steve Jobs. Now we have no Cash, no Hope and no Jobs....
Lord, please keep Kevin Bacon alive...
Lord, please keep Kevin Bacon alive...
- Juha Tompuri
- Forum Staff
- Posts: 11562
- Joined: 11 Sep 2002, 21:02
- Location: Mylsä
Re: Seelöwe - German & British mining operations
Thank you for revealing that.phylo_roadking wrote:but as I can't scan it, we'll have to do with a scan previously posted some years ago now on Armchair general
Regards, Juha
Last edited by Juha Tompuri on 22 Mar 2015, 00:46, edited 2 times in total.
Reason: correcting
Reason: correcting