Anglo American loanSheldrake wrote:
We finished paying the HP installments in 2006
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-American_loan
https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hans ... -agreement
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/4757181.stm
Anglo American loanSheldrake wrote:
We finished paying the HP installments in 2006
There's a 50s film starring Jack Hawkins called "The Intruder", early in the film there's a scene where they film Shermans being cut up in a field... must be over 50 of them. I think they cut the barrels off and remove the engines. [demilitarised and removed the usable part? I think the army would have removed radios and anything re-usable? ]Gooner1 wrote:
Anyone know what happened to all the British Shermans post-war?
And fired at by a gun that is also on that same level ground.Attrition wrote:Surely sloped armour is a misnomer and should be called "armour sloped when resting on level ground"?
Good point! Forgot about plunging fire! But, hopefully no one would fire at a tank at that distance, even if he could see it!!Attrition wrote:Not too far away either, so the shell doesn't have a parabolic trajectory.Delta Tank wrote:And fired at by a gun that is also on that same level ground.Attrition wrote:Surely sloped armour is a misnomer and should be called "armour sloped when resting on level ground"?
Mike
Plunging fire by a US 155mm battalion or British 5.5" Medium Regiment could KO tanksDelta Tank wrote: Good point! Forgot about plunging fire! But, hopefully no one would fire at a tank at that distance, even if he could see it!!
Mike