Tigers in the Bulge

Discussions on WW2 in Western Europe & the Atlantic.
Larso
Member
Posts: 1974
Joined: 27 Apr 2003, 03:18
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Tigers in the Bulge

#1

Post by Larso » 05 Dec 2019, 03:31

Now I'm sure this has been discussed before but my searches haven't found much?

I've been putting together the German tank strengths for the Ardennes attack and there's a lot of contraditory material. The one I'm perplexed about at the moment is the involvement of Tiger tanks. Some sources state that 200 or more Tiger tanks were involved but my research only points to the 30 - 35 Royal Tigers of the 501st SS with Pieper's battlegroup.

Surely there were others? But I can't find a mention of any oter unit? Various memoirs talk about Tigers at Norville and other places. I imagine they could have been allocated in company groups to the panzer divisions - but again, nothing clear is coming up?

Can anyone point me to suitable threads or soucres?
Thanks
John

OpanaPointer
Financial supporter
Posts: 5657
Joined: 16 May 2010, 15:12
Location: United States of America

Re: Tigers in the Bulge

#2

Post by OpanaPointer » 05 Dec 2019, 06:28

Didn't they have issues with the bridges?
Come visit our sites:
hyperwarHyperwar
World War II Resources

Bellum se ipsum alet, mostly Doritos.


Richard Anderson
Member
Posts: 6396
Joined: 01 Jan 2016, 22:21
Location: Bremerton, Washington

Re: Tigers in the Bulge

#3

Post by Richard Anderson » 05 Dec 2019, 07:15

Larso wrote:
05 Dec 2019, 03:31
Now I'm sure this has been discussed before but my searches haven't found much?

I've been putting together the German tank strengths for the Ardennes attack and there's a lot of contraditory material. The one I'm perplexed about at the moment is the involvement of Tiger tanks. Some sources state that 200 or more Tiger tanks were involved but my research only points to the 30 - 35 Royal Tigers of the 501st SS with Pieper's battlegroup.

Surely there were others? But I can't find a mention of any oter unit? Various memoirs talk about Tigers at Norville and other places. I imagine they could have been allocated in company groups to the panzer divisions - but again, nothing clear is coming up?

Can anyone point me to suitable threads or soucres?
Thanks
John
In addition to 501. SS there was also sPzAbtl 506. (Heer), which was committed at Bastogne on 21 December, and also 301. (FKL), which had some Tiger I. There were never "200 or more" though.
Richard C. Anderson Jr.

American Thunder: U.S. Army Tank Design, Development, and Doctrine in World War II
Cracking Hitler's Atlantic Wall
Hitler's Last Gamble
Artillery Hell

Larso
Member
Posts: 1974
Joined: 27 Apr 2003, 03:18
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Re: Tigers in the Bulge

#4

Post by Larso » 05 Dec 2019, 09:40

Thanks Richard, that's exactly what I needed. It pointed me to a great thread on Feldgrau where Ron Klages provided excellent detail. I've summarised it as follows -

47 Tiger 2s + 8 Tiger 1s (Hummel Co) : 506th Heavy Pz Bn

29 Tiger 1s : 301st Pz Bn (stayed in reserve)

So the total is more in the order of 130 but minus the 301st and those non-op/being repaired, there were less than 100 Tiger 1 or 2s actually in action.

Larso
Member
Posts: 1974
Joined: 27 Apr 2003, 03:18
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Re: Tigers in the Bulge

#5

Post by Larso » 05 Dec 2019, 11:19

My next questions is about Pieper's Battle Group. Along from the 501st, it seems to have comprised all of the Pz IVs and Panthers assigned to the 1SS PZ Division.
Am I understanding correctly that the bulk of the 1st SS therefore went into the battle with only 10 - 20 Jagdpanzers?

User avatar
Kingfish
Member
Posts: 3348
Joined: 05 Jun 2003, 17:22
Location: USA

Re: Tigers in the Bulge

#6

Post by Kingfish » 05 Dec 2019, 11:42

For what it's worth I am currently playing John Tiller's 'Bulge '44' computer game, and it shows the mixed Tiger battalion of the 506th, a panzer company of the 301st attached to 9th PD and - depending on if you count this as a "Tiger" - a company of Jagdtigers of the 653rd assigned to PzAOK 5.

I should add that the particular scenario I am on begins with the German offensive at it's high tide -in other words 2nd Pz at Celles- so attrition has been factored in and not all units that were present are shown.
The gods do not deduct from a man's allotted span the hours spent in fishing.
~Babylonian Proverb

User avatar
Simon H
Member
Posts: 492
Joined: 11 Apr 2002, 13:58
Location: UK

Re: Tigers in the Bulge

#7

Post by Simon H » 06 Dec 2019, 12:45

Larso wrote:
05 Dec 2019, 11:19
My next questions is about Pieper's Battle Group. Along from the 501st, it seems to have comprised all of the Pz IVs and Panthers assigned to the 1SS PZ Division.
Am I understanding correctly that the bulk of the 1st SS therefore went into the battle with only 10 - 20 Jagdpanzers?
Kampfgruppe Peiper did not have any Jagdpanzers assigned to it directly although SS-Panzer Jager Abteilung 12 were later indirectly involved.
WW2 Battlefield Relics: German Erkennungsmarken Identification.

User avatar
dgfred
Member
Posts: 386
Joined: 31 Jan 2008, 17:56
Location: N.C., USA

Re: Tigers in the Bulge

#8

Post by dgfred » 25 Feb 2020, 17:34

I thought the few 'bigger' tanks in Pieper's Group couldn't keep up originally and moved forward as best they could? Problems with congestion, roads, bridges, etc

JABIER
Member
Posts: 163
Joined: 27 May 2008, 08:46

Re: Tigers in the Bulge

#9

Post by JABIER » 19 Aug 2020, 12:30

Hi,
Post (Feldgrau.net) by Peter » Sun Jan 09, 2005 4:01 am

s.Panzer Abteilung 506
Meldung 1.12.44

Berge Panzer V and VI Soll 5, Einzatsbereit 3, in Kurzfristiger 1
Flak Panser IV, Soll 8, Einzatsbereit 5
Panzer VI, Soll 45, Einsatsbereit 11, in Kurzfristiger 13
There is another Meldung from 1.11.44 with this numbers: Panzer VI, Soll 45, Einsatsbereit 36, in Kurzfristiger 2
Luckily there is also a Panzerlage of LXXXI Corps from 2.11.44: s.pz.Abt 506 Ist. 39, Einsatzb. 36 ,Kurtzfr. Ist. 2, Langfr. Ist 1

I would say that "Soll" is the theoretical number of Tigers in the Abteilung, not the total number on the date of the "Meldung". Also in this report does not appear the number of tigers in long term repairs. Although In the Meldung the commander added this information:
Post by Peter » Sun Jan 09, 2005 4:01 am

s.Panzer Abteilung 506
Meldung 1.12.44

Kurzes Werturteil des Kommandeurs:-
Abteilung zur Zeit nur bedingt einsatzbereit, da 14 tage ununterbrochen im Einsatz. Nach Zeit (7 Tage) für Instandsetsung und Pflege 25 Panzern dann wieder für jede Aufgabe verwendungsbereit.
So at least there was one tiger in longterm repairs. How many more is unknow to me. Any one knows where to find this information?

Regards,
Javier

Alanmccoubrey
Member
Posts: 3370
Joined: 19 Sep 2008, 14:44

Re: Tigers in the Bulge

#10

Post by Alanmccoubrey » 19 Aug 2020, 13:57

Simon H wrote:
06 Dec 2019, 12:45
Larso wrote:
05 Dec 2019, 11:19
My next questions is about Pieper's Battle Group. Along from the 501st, it seems to have comprised all of the Pz IVs and Panthers assigned to the 1SS PZ Division.
Am I understanding correctly that the bulk of the 1st SS therefore went into the battle with only 10 - 20 Jagdpanzers?
Kampfgruppe Peiper did not have any Jagdpanzers assigned to it directly although SS-Panzer Jager Abteilung 12 were later indirectly involved.
He didn't say that Peiper had any Jagdpanzers, he said that the rest of the division only had Jagdpanzers, because Peip[er had all the tanks.
Alan

AllenM
Member
Posts: 92
Joined: 18 Sep 2018, 05:01
Location: USA

Re: Tigers in the Bulge

#11

Post by AllenM » 19 Aug 2020, 23:55

Everything cannot be found on the internet.

https://www.amazon.com/Tanks-Battle-Bul ... 1472839226

JABIER
Member
Posts: 163
Joined: 27 May 2008, 08:46

Re: Tigers in the Bulge

#12

Post by JABIER » 22 Aug 2020, 21:08

Hi AllenM,

For a pair of eyes is difficult to find all the information on the Internet, but in Forums there are many eyes. This helps a lot. Thanks for the book hint. It is searchable through googlebooks, unfortunately it does not contains the information that I am looking for.

https://books.google.es/books?id=9hazDw ... ge&f=false

Best regards,
Javier

paulrward
Member
Posts: 665
Joined: 10 Dec 2008, 21:14

Re: Tigers in the Bulge

#13

Post by paulrward » 23 Aug 2020, 16:59

Hello All :

Mr. Allen M stated :
Everything cannot be found on the internet.

It is also important to remember what Abraham Lincoln said :


" You can't believe everything you read on the Internet...."


( I found this quote on the internet..... )


Respectfully :

Paul R. Ward
Information not shared, is information lost
Voices that are banned, are voices who cannot share information....
Discussions that are silenced, are discussions that will occur elsewhere !

User avatar
Texas Jäger
Member
Posts: 131
Joined: 07 Apr 2020, 01:29
Location: Montgomery, Texas

Re: Tigers in the Bulge

#14

Post by Texas Jäger » 02 Dec 2020, 01:26

So the only Tigers near Elsenborn Ridge would have been Peiper's when they passed through Büllingen?

User avatar
Simon H
Member
Posts: 492
Joined: 11 Apr 2002, 13:58
Location: UK

Re: Tigers in the Bulge

#15

Post by Simon H » 07 Dec 2020, 14:13

Texas Jäger wrote:
02 Dec 2020, 01:26
So the only Tigers near Elsenborn Ridge would have been Peiper's when they passed through Büllingen?

Yes, these would have been the Tiger II column of schwere SS-Panzer-Abteilung 501 which travelled at the tail of KG Peiper during its advance.
WW2 Battlefield Relics: German Erkennungsmarken Identification.

Post Reply

Return to “WW2 in Western Europe & the Atlantic”