Aida1 wrote: ↑28 Aug 2022 07:54
Yuri wrote: ↑12 Apr 2022 07:50
The advantage of conventional (towed) artillery as well as infantry is that these types of troops are all-season, all-weather, all-passable and everything all-.
In the two videos presented above, a battery of howitzers is firing in the rain, and it is clear that the cloud cover is low. I doubt that a drone can help in this weather. Imagine that it is night and it is snowing heavily.
No, artillery is the god of war, and infantry is its queen.
You will not replace Inf&Art with any ultra modern gadgets.
Nonsense. These ultra modern gadgets like drones are very effective as they make identifying targets much easier and makes your beloved artillery much more vulnerable to very precise weapons.
Dear Mr. Aida1!
You so often begin your brief critical posts with the word
"Nonsense" that soon you will be addressed not
"Dear Mr. Aida1",
but
"Dear Mr. Nonsense".
To speak briefly is a commendable quality.
As you know, brevity is the mother of talent.
But this will be true provided that a short statement is filled with deep meaning and vivid imagery.
At the same time, your brief statements (at least from those that I have read) look gray, boring, meaningless and do not give food for thought/are not of interest.
Sorry for speaking bluntly, cutting, so to speak, the truth of the uterus right in the eyes.
As you know, Comrade Stalin had the talent to express thoughts briefly, but at the same time, succinctly and figuratively. For example, the words of Comrade Stalin
"Artillery is the God of War!" is a masterpiece, die, but you can't say better about the importance of artillery on the battlefield.
In Cyrillic, this is very brief:
"Артиллерия Бог войны!".
Let me rephrase a little one of Comrade Stalin's laconic statements in relation to your posts.
"You have taken the position of a laconic critic.
This position is very convenient, but rotten through and through."
Now to the point.
You persistently try to rank me among the cohort of
"Opponents of the use of UAVs".
I don't find any reason for this.
I have never given any reason for accusations of such a serious crime anywhere.
The regulations of the infantry and artillery of the Soviet Army, which I studied when I served in the Army, as well as my senior military leaders continuously inspired me that enemy reconnaissance should be conducted continuously by all available means and methods. This is the law. Any deviation from this law is considered a grave crime.
I will be the last one who refuses to use such a convenient means as a UAV for reconnaissance (surveillance).
At the same time, if my subordinate commanders (officers and sergeants) use only UAVs for reconnaissance, but other available means of artillery reconnaissance will not be involved, then I will immediately send my subordinate officer (sergeant) to a penal battalion for three months.
However, here's a challenge for you.
Condition:
You have three means of intelligence.
1. Scout (soldier) with a walkie-talkie;
2. Radar complex of counter-battery warfare
(for example, such as "Zoopark-1M"
Zoopark-1M(1L260)_3.jpg
or ARTHUR
ARTHUR_radar_NASR_2021_in_Al_Qalail_(Qatar).jpg
or MAMBA(GB) or AN/TRQ-36/48 (USA) or others.
3. UAV.
You have been given a condition:
"One of these three means of intelligence will be withdrawn.
You have to choose for yourself which two funds will remain with you."
Which two means will you keep for yourself?
You have five seconds to think and the time has start.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.