Cult Icon wrote: ↑23 Nov 2022 14:29
Missiles or PGMs? The Russian approach with daily missile strikes on strategic targets seems impressive conceptually but the final results hasn't won them the war.
The Department of Defense (DOD) defines a precision-guided munition (PGM) as a “guided weapon intended to destroy a point target and minimize collateral damage.” This includes air- and ship-launched missiles, multiple launched rockets, and guided bombs. PGMs typically use the global positioning system (GPS), laser guidance, or inertial navigation systems to improve a weapon’s accuracy to reportedly less than 3 meters (approximately 10 feet). [Congressional Research Service]
Are you acknowledging that Russian missiles are incapable both of destroying point targets and minimising collateral damage?
Cult Icon wrote: ↑23 Nov 2022 14:29
5-week air offensive with extremely high volume PGMs (US/Coalition approach in invading Iraq) attacking infrastructure and military targets in retrospect was much more effective. IIRC the US/Coalition also killed a lot more civilians with collateral damage.
Are you including the Iraqi civilians killed by cluster bombs etc. in addition to PGM-related losses?
Additionally if you have more accurate Ukrainian civilian losses figures than the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights please do provide them.
OHCHR believes that the actual figures are considerably higher, as the receipt of information from some locations where intense hostilities have been going on has been delayed and many reports are still pending corroboration.
And finally, why should anyone believe quantitative assessments from someone like you who has proven himself incapable of handling calculations involving double-digit numbers somewhat over 50?
Markus