It´s hard to distinguish civilians from partisans when the latter doesn´t wear any signs/armbands to "mark" them as enemy. Even the highest commanders of the Armia Krajowa in the Warsaw Uprising did NOT wear such signs visible on a distance. So they were not recognisable as partisans/commanders but did endanger real civilians with their actions. And this example was followed by many! When such unmarked partisans were KIA they were considered "innocent civilians" by their countrymen as weapons got quickly collected (when possible) before their retreat.
Are this innocent civilans or partisans of the french resistance?
Source: https://www.spectator.co.uk/2015/08/the ... dern-myth/
Another unlawful fighter is sneaking up:
How many of them are marked as members of the resistance?
Humilation and violation of human rights by unmarked civilians (most likely French resistance) under the eye of a cop or French soldier:
Further "though" guys of the French resistance humilating UNLAWFUL defenseless women:
What about the massacre of civilians, babies, children, women, unarmed men ? Was it legal too in your opinion ?
The question is of they were real civilians or unmarked partisans.
The babies and children?
As legal as the bombings of Dresden and other cities with civilian cassualties.