Reverend is getting smarter by the hour. And I thought that the head is the best place to aim at if you want to kill someone. As to the child, it will either be hit by the bullet passing through the mother or die all by itself when she has been shot.Scott Smith wrote:I don't know if it is true or not, Mr. Believer. The rifle, if it is even aimed at the woman, is aimed at her head and not at her torso, and thus additionally not the child. That embellishment was just a little bit of Greuelpropaganda perhaps.medorjurgen wrote:No, Reverend. It would be better if it were not, but unfortunately it is.Scott Smith wrote:And, if it's not true, it ought to be, right?
Because the picture shows an ad-hoc shooting rather than an organized Einsatzgruppen - style mass execution, most likely. It is probable, as a matter of fact, that it shows victims of anti-partisan reprisals against civilians rather than Jews killed in the course of an Einsatzgruppen mass execution. Makes no difference to me, as it's murder in both cases.And they supposedly have time to dig a grave, so why aren't they stripping her naked FIRST?
Reverend is shooting himself into the foot. In the Einsatzgruppen mass executions of Jews, people were forced to strip naked before being shot into mass graves. Such did not necessarily happen when German forces shot civilians as a reprisal for partisan attacks or in the course of so-called anti-partisan operations. Which means that this picture:But, as per your previous objection, if they can't salvage the clothes then why take them at all?
http://www.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/ftp.py?or ... /eg-07.refBerenbaum, Michael. The World Must Know. ISBN 0-316-09135-9. Page 96.
shows the result of a mass execution of Jews and not of an "anti-partisan" massacre of civilians, by the Reverend's own reasoning. The Reverend should get some rest.
As you well know, Reverend, I only consider atrocity stories to be true if they are properly documented. And if it were not for True Believers like the Reverend, I would hardly be talking about atrocities at all. So cut out the crap, will you?No, Roberto, I think you should reach deep inside yourself and find the honesty to admit that you need atrocity stories to be true--whether they ARE or not is unimportant.
No, buddy. Just as you want to question whatever doesn't fit into your bubble because it doesn't fit into your bubble, I require evidence and reason to support such questioning, which I haven't see so far on the "Revisionist" side.Just as I want to question the stories, you want NOT to question them.
The other way round once again, Reverend. I demand evidence and follow the evidence there is where it leads, because unlike the Reverend I have no ideological axe to grind. You demand Faith in that, whatever the evidence, things you don't want to have happened never happened. That is "Moral Certainty", Mr. True Believer.I think that's "Moral Certainty," don't you? You demand piety. I demand proof.
“Hoaxbuster” Friedrich Paul Berg on the Codoh discussion forum.Keep the Faith fellow revisionists. The Nazis and the SS were the good guys--but the anti-Nazis and the anti-revisionists dare not admit it for fear of losing their fabulous, ill gotten gains from the war.”
http://www.codoh.org/dcforum/DCForumID9/143.html#10
