Jehovah's Witnesses

Discussions on the Holocaust and 20th Century War Crimes. Note that Holocaust denial is not allowed. Hosted by David Thompson.
Xanthro
Member
Posts: 2803
Joined: 26 Mar 2002 00:11
Location: Pasadena, CA

Post by Xanthro » 16 Apr 2003 20:44

Javier Acuña wrote:I would really apretiate that you stop refering to Jehovah's Witnesses as heretics or fanatics. While some of their interpretations seem to me a little extremists (specially the Book of Apocalipsis), they are by no means extremists.

They do not serve their country in war because they follow the 6th Commandment by Heart. They are fully aware about the consecuences of such actions. Besides, they say "To God what belongs to God and to the Caesar (political power) what belongs to the Caesar"; they believe that they owe obedience only to God, and not to terrenal powers.

Just for the record, I'm not a Jehovah's Witnesses.
I haven't seen anyone in this thread refer to a JW as a heretic or fanatic.

BTW, your views on why they don't serve in the military are a bit off, they are more complex than that.

The reason they pay taxes is because of "Give unto God what is God's and give unto Ceaser what is Ceaser's"

They don't serve in the military for the same reason they don't vote, they feel they belong to the Kingdom of God, not the Kingdom of Man, and as such they do not participate in the government.

I'm not a JW and would never become one, but I do meet with them from time to time. They come to my house about once a month, and we have tea. They actually use my neighborhood as a training ground, and it's one trainer and one trainee who comes over, I'll usually have tea with them.

We debate the merits of their religion, but I'm pretty nice to them.

Xanthro

Dan
Member
Posts: 8429
Joined: 10 Mar 2002 14:06
Location: California

Post by Dan » 17 Apr 2003 00:29

As an aside, they are heretics purely from an ecumentical standpoint, and would have been concidered heretics by all the Germany European allies as they reject the 7 ecumenical councils. And for better or for worse, even today they are not invited to ecumenical councils hosted by Catholic, Lutheran or Orthodox parties.

And it wasn't just the Axis, France is toying with a law to ban them today.

Just a note for context.

The City of Man and the City of God exist side by side, and the Christian is a citizen of both, according to St. Augustine, and this is the basis of modern Chrisitan belief concerning military service. If the war conforms to the historic definition of a Just War, Christian fight.

I am making no comment on Barbarossa, of course, just adding some historical context.

Xanthro
Member
Posts: 2803
Joined: 26 Mar 2002 00:11
Location: Pasadena, CA

Post by Xanthro » 17 Apr 2003 01:00

Dan wrote:As an aside, they are heretics purely from an ecumentical standpoint, and would have been concidered heretics by all the Germany European allies as they reject the 7 ecumenical councils. And for better or for worse, even today they are not invited to ecumenical councils hosted by Catholic, Lutheran or Orthodox parties.

And it wasn't just the Axis, France is toying with a law to ban them today.

Just a note for context.

The City of Man and the City of God exist side by side, and the Christian is a citizen of both, according to St. Augustine, and this is the basis of modern Chrisitan belief concerning military service. If the war conforms to the historic definition of a Just War, Christian fight.

I am making no comment on Barbarossa, of course, just adding some historical context.
Dan, I'm not saying I argee with them. LOL. I'm just restating their arguments. I've heard them a number of times.

Xanthro

User avatar
Dan W.
Member
Posts: 8518
Joined: 12 Mar 2002 01:53
Location: IL.

Post by Dan W. » 17 Apr 2003 01:41

Jehova's Witnesses were prized as barbers in the camps, and in fact many of them were trained for these positions. It was said that the SS only felt safe getting a shave or a haircut from a Jehova's Witness, who they knew would not use the straight edge razor in their hands to attempt to kill them.

Regards,
D.W.

User avatar
Scott Smith
Member
Posts: 5602
Joined: 10 Mar 2002 21:17
Location: Arizona

Post by Scott Smith » 17 Apr 2003 01:50

Roberto wrote:
Scott Smith wrote:Nevertheless, I maintain that the persecution against the JWs in wartime Germany was on account of their resistance to serving their country in war.
:)
If you maintain that, Smith, how about showing us the evidence that your contention is based on?
I suggest that you do some of your own research once in a while. My opinions are based on a lot of reading, but I admit that I don't have all the answers.
:idea:
Roberto wrote:Some quotes from the autobiography of Auschwitz-Birkenau commandant Rudolf Höß (Phoenix Press edition, translation by Constantine Fitzgibbon) about Jehova’s Witnesses:
Rudolf Höß wrote:There were many Jehovah's Witnesses in Sachsenhausen. A great number of them refused to undertake military service and because of this the Reichsführer SS condemned them to death. They were shot in the presence of all the inmates of the camp duly assembled. The other Jehovah's Witnesses were placed in the front rank so that they must watch the proceedings.
If they were sentenced to death at the camp by Himmler because they refused to undertake military service, this suggests that the reason why they were brought to the camp in the first place was another.
They wouldn't work for the State either, and that includes in the labor camps.
Roberto wrote:
Rudolf Höß wrote:As people, Jehovah's Witnesses were quiet, industrious and sociable men and women, who were always ready to help their fellow-creatures. Most of them were craftsmen, though many were peasants from East Prussia. In peacetime, so long as they confined their activities to prayer and the service of God and their fraternal gatherings, they were of no danger to the State and indeed quite harmless generally. From 1937 onwards, however, the increased proselyti sing by the sect attracted the attention of the authorities, and investigations were made. These investigations showed that our enemies were zealously fostering the propagation of the beliefs of Jehovah's Witnesses in order to undermine by religious means the military moral of the people. So proselytising by Jehova's Witnesses was forbidden. It became only too evident, at the outbreak of the war, what a danger would have arisen if the more energetic and fanatical of the Witnesses had not been taken into custody during the previous couple of years, and a stop put to their active proselytising.[my emphasis]
According to the above, it seems that what bugged good old Adolf about the JW’s was their "proselytising" of pacifist ideas. Their overall refusal to acknowledge state authority, although not mentioned by Höß, may also have played a part in the considerations leading to their persecution.
Wonder how ol' Uncle Joe dealt with the Jay-Dubs?
:wink:

User avatar
Javier Acuña
Member
Posts: 879
Joined: 24 Nov 2002 04:48
Location: Santiago, Chile

Post by Javier Acuña » 17 Apr 2003 03:13

To Xanthro: I just read these quotes regarding JWs in this same topic.
He is one among many that have left this heretical cult for various reasons.

I don't really expect someone with such fanatical views to change them except under the most extreme circumstances
I have some JWs texts on my own, Published by the Watchtower Society. Since it's none of my interest to discuss JWs' views or doctrine I only encourage you to ask your JW friend to lend you "True Peace and Security - From What Source?" Published by the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York, printed in 1973. In chapter 3 there are some spefici remarks about JWs views about war and religions that support them

To Dan: Thanks for the note about the 7 ecumenical councils rejection, I was not aware that you could consider someone an heretic by such standards. In spanish, heretic ("hereje") also means shameless, unashamed. And I definitely do not considerate JW as a shameless group of people.

Anyway, this is entirely off topic and I think I would leave it like this.

Dan
Member
Posts: 8429
Joined: 10 Mar 2002 14:06
Location: California

Post by Dan » 17 Apr 2003 13:38

Dan, I'm not saying I argee with them. LOL. I'm just restating their arguments. I've heard them a number of times.


I know, and I admire your patients with them. I'm afraid I am somewhat curt when they come once a month or so to my door.

I just wanted to make it clear that their belief system isn't of historical "orthodox" standards, and there was very little sympathy for them anywhere. The point of heresy (and as I have said, this is no insult, just to help put in perspective what European society thought of them) is of a standard definition, not just like what the word means in modern Spanish, or English for that matter, where it's more commonly used as a Monty Python type joke.

During the time of the Third Reich, and at least technically even today, the main line Protestant Churches, the different Catholic Rites, and all the Eastern Orthodox Churches conform to the basic Ecumenical Councils, starting with Nicea, and going through Epheses one and two, Chalcedon, then Constantanople one through three, although in typical form there is still bickering about whether or not 2 and 3 contradict each other. At an ecumenical meeting in Berlin in 1891 the Greek Orthodox Church won a 1600 year old legal fight with the Catholic Church whereby the "Filioque" was not maditorilly attached to one of the "symbols" or findings of one of the coucils, I forget which.

So keeping things on topic, groups which rejected those councils like the JW, Mormons and to a lesser degree the Armenian and Coptic Churches were on the outside looking in, and there weren't many voices passionately advocating leniency.

Regards

User avatar
Roberto
Member
Posts: 4505
Joined: 11 Mar 2002 15:35
Location: Lisbon, Portugal

Post by Roberto » 17 Apr 2003 15:08

Scott Smith wrote:
Roberto wrote:
Scott Smith wrote:Nevertheless, I maintain that the persecution against the JWs in wartime Germany was on account of their resistance to serving their country in war.
:)
If you maintain that, Smith, how about showing us the evidence that your contention is based on?
I suggest that you do some of your own research once in a while. My opinions are based on a lot of reading, but I admit that I don't have all the answers.
If so, and assuming you were not just trying to provide some "comic relief" for the Easter holidays, how come your ample research (inside or outisde the "Revisionist" bullshit box, Smith?) shows so little in the intellectual and moral refuse you produce?

In case you still haven't understood, this is a discussion forum. If you make an assertion, it is up to you to back it up when questioned. Even the not exactly transparent posting rules of the extinct Codoh forum contained this principle:
Posts labeling a comment as "false," or saying that it is incorrect without support for the claim may be rejected. But it's always OK to request verification for a statement.
Did you also send your opponents to the library over there, Smith?
Scott Smith wrote:
Roberto wrote:Some quotes from the autobiography of Auschwitz-Birkenau commandant Rudolf Höß (Phoenix Press edition, translation by Constantine Fitzgibbon) about Jehova’s Witnesses:
Rudolf Höß wrote:There were many Jehovah's Witnesses in Sachsenhausen. A great number of them refused to undertake military service and because of this the Reichsführer SS condemned them to death. They were shot in the presence of all the inmates of the camp duly assembled. The other Jehovah's Witnesses were placed in the front rank so that they must watch the proceedings.
If they were sentenced to death at the camp by Himmler because they refused to undertake military service, this suggests that the reason why they were brought to the camp in the first place was another.
They wouldn't work for the State either, and that includes in the labor camps.
Roberto wrote:
Rudolf Höß wrote:As people, Jehovah's Witnesses were quiet, industrious and sociable men and women, who were always ready to help their fellow-creatures. Most of them were craftsmen, though many were peasants from East Prussia. In peacetime, so long as they confined their activities to prayer and the service of God and their fraternal gatherings, they were of no danger to the State and indeed quite harmless generally. From 1937 onwards, however, the increased proselyti sing by the sect attracted the attention of the authorities, and investigations were made. These investigations showed that our enemies were zealously fostering the propagation of the beliefs of Jehovah's Witnesses in order to undermine by religious means the military moral of the people. So proselytising by Jehova's Witnesses was forbidden. It became only too evident, at the outbreak of the war, what a danger would have arisen if the more energetic and fanatical of the Witnesses had not been taken into custody during the previous couple of years, and a stop put to their active proselytising.[my emphasis]
According to the above, it seems that what bugged good old Adolf about the JW’s was their "proselytising" of pacifist ideas. Their overall refusal to acknowledge state authority, although not mentioned by Höß, may also have played a part in the considerations leading to their persecution.
Wonder how ol' Uncle Joe dealt with the Jay-Dubs?
:wink:
Ask the question in a less idiotic manner, and maybe Kokampf or another poster with ample knowledge of Stalinism will bother to respond.

Xanthro
Member
Posts: 2803
Joined: 26 Mar 2002 00:11
Location: Pasadena, CA

Post by Xanthro » 17 Apr 2003 17:12

Javier Acuña wrote:To Xanthro: I just read these quotes regarding JWs in this same topic.
He is one among many that have left this heretical cult for various reasons.

I don't really expect someone with such fanatical views to change them except under the most extreme circumstances
I have some JWs texts on my own, Published by the Watchtower Society. Since it's none of my interest to discuss JWs' views or doctrine I only encourage you to ask your JW friend to lend you "True Peace and Security - From What Source?" Published by the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York, printed in 1973. In chapter 3 there are some spefici remarks about JWs views about war and religions that support them

To Dan: Thanks for the note about the 7 ecumenical councils rejection, I was not aware that you could consider someone an heretic by such standards. In spanish, heretic ("hereje") also means shameless, unashamed. And I definitely do not considerate JW as a shameless group of people.

Anyway, this is entirely off topic and I think I would leave it like this.
I didn't even see that post you referenced. LOL.

I'll agree, that his use of the word Heretic seems degratory. Plus, I don't think Jackson has actually left the church officially, though I could be wrong.

BTW, heretic has many different meanings, not all of them negative. In religious terms, it really just means someone who holds a belief outside the mainstream acceptance. JW would fall into this category, as a Christian belief system, many of their tenents do fall outside the realm of mainstream acceptance of other Christian denominations. Though the negative connotations of the word heretic usually preclude its use in rational discussions, but when someone like Dan uses the word, it has a different meaning that you may take it.

Xanthro

James McBride
Member
Posts: 540
Joined: 15 Mar 2003 22:58
Location: Sonoma County, California

Post by James McBride » 18 Apr 2003 06:24

I would consider believing in multiple eras that the world is going to end fanatical. Maybe this does not represent all of the followers, but there are a number of Jehovah's Witnesses that have believed that. Christians believed it before 1000 A.D., and I would consider that too to be fanatical. Maybe we have different definitions in our minds.

James

User avatar
Balrog
Member
Posts: 1248
Joined: 17 Feb 2003 15:09
Location: USA, North Carolina/Manchukuo/Dominican Republic

Post by Balrog » 18 Apr 2003 17:40

i asked some friends about the video "purple triangles", on the jehovah witness in nazi germany. the video was not produced by the churchJW, it was made by the BBC tv channel in england, so it should be easier to purchase than i believed. second, someone asked how stalin dealth with the jehovah witnesses. well, in a rough manner. the JW's were outlawed and like in hitler times, the JW need only sign a paper stating that they no longer belive to be released form either gulags or siberian exile. the JW's were depicted in soviet films as brainwashed mental defectives. often depicted as physically deformed! there are accounts by JW's of being herded onto cattle train cars(with even wives and children), like the jews under the nazis, and driven out to siberia. people would die in the cars sometimes, and though the conditions were not so bad like the jews had, the train rides were still difficult. at railroad stops the JW's would call to other train cattle cars and asked if any JW's were on board, if someone responded yes, the JW's would sing christian songs together. there is yet another video documentery, featuring many interviews with russian/ukraine/etc (soviet) JW's. "faithful under trial", produced in 2001, by the JW church. it even includes interviews with ex KGB agents sent to infiltrate the JW's to destroy the net works of believers, only to end up as a JW convert himself. the suffering was terrible under the soviets, and today some living russian JW's tell of spending over 23 years in gulags for their faith. one interesting note, today JW's who served long sentences in soviet gulags for religious reasons are treated as war veterens and receive pensions, priveleges, and medical care, as any other war veteren.

User avatar
Kokampf
Member
Posts: 185
Joined: 10 Nov 2002 19:45
Location: London, UK

Post by Kokampf » 18 Apr 2003 18:13

Thankyou for this little titbit - I honestly had no idea whatsoever about treatment of JWs in the USSR, and was uncertain that there would have been any, as it is a sect of 19th century American origin which I wouldn't have immediately expected to have reached Russia before the revolution (after which religious proselytising there became extremely dangerous). There were some pretty bizarre home-grown Orthodox sects in the old Russian empire, such as the Scoptzi (who practised extreme genital mutilation and castration), which were certainly enthusiastically persecuted by the Bolsheviks. Noticeable religious zeal, particularly when pertaining to sects and religions of foreign origin and organisation, was regarded with considerable suspicion.
joel pacheco wrote:second, someone asked how stalin dealth with the jehovah witnesses. well, in a rough manner. the JW's were outlawed and like in hitler times, the JW need only sign a paper stating that they no longer belive to be released form either gulags or siberian exile. the JW's were depicted in soviet films as brainwashed mental defectives. often depicted as physically deformed! there are accounts by JW's of being herded onto cattle train cars(with even wives and children), like the jews under the nazis, and driven out to siberia. people would die in the cars sometimes, and though the conditions were not so bad like the jews had, the train rides were still difficult.
The train rides were also much longer (assuming a starting point in European Russia), and the climatic conditions often terrible.
at railroad stops the JW's would call to other train cattle cars and asked if any JW's were on board, if someone responded yes, the JW's would sing christian songs together. there is yet another video documentery, featuring many interviews with russian/ukraine/etc (soviet) JW's. "faithful under trial", produced in 2001, by the JW church. it even includes interviews with ex KGB agents sent to infiltrate the JW's to destroy the net works of believers, only to end up as a JW convert himself. the suffering was terrible under the soviets, and today some living russian JW's tell of spending over 23 years in gulags for their faith.
Grim indeed. I should very much like to see some more objective non-JW-church-produced sources on this too - can you recommend anything? Incidentally all the personal accounts I've ever seen of the GULAG have many references to the 'convicted Christians' amongst them and their place in the social life of the zeks. To persist with religious observances in these places was a good way to get an increased sentence, but often a real comfort to other inmates. For example from Nikolai Getman's fifty secret paintings of his life in the GULAG system:

http://www.jamestown.org/getman/painting21.htm
one interesting note, today JW's who served long sentences in soviet gulags for religious reasons are treated as war veterens and receive pensions, priveleges, and medical care, as any other war veteren.
The rehabilitation of GULAG survivors in general is a complex subject, with some still waiting for this sort of recognition and some not as I understand it. From the site I quoted above, a little about Getman's own experience:

"The man depicted is holding his rehabilitation papers, documents in which the Russian state declares him a free man with a restored name. Freedom after the Gulag, however, was often a mixed experience. Many former inmates remained under travel restrictions and could live only in certain areas. The stigma of having been a prisoner in the Gulag also made it difficult to advance professionally. The artist himself was denied promotion in his artist’s union years after he had been released and Stalin’s cult denounced. Many former prisoners internalized the stigma. They felt somehow different, even guilty, notwithstanding the fact that they knew they had done nothing wrong. In 1991, President Boris Yeltsin of Russia issued a decree that would provide monetary compensation for survivors of the Gulag. The former prisoners would be paid a sum prorated for the amount of time served. The lump sum which Getman received was small, approximately the same as his pension of $50 per month. When he received his rehabilitation papers, Getman personalized the original of this painting by affixing his rehabilitation documents to the man's hands."

http://www.jamestown.org/getman/painting50.htm[/url]

User avatar
Balrog
Member
Posts: 1248
Joined: 17 Feb 2003 15:09
Location: USA, North Carolina/Manchukuo/Dominican Republic

Post by Balrog » 18 Apr 2003 18:26

as far as documentation fron non JW church sources, i have very few. the non church sources are very broad and don't really focus on the JW's too much. the video, which was well produced is still extremely intersting. it includes film clips from actually soviet trials of JW's and soviet anti JW propaganda films(truly bizarre). the video includes interviews with current russian government officials who throw open the files to reveal horror stories of JW persecutions. the interviews are extremely moving, and interview with the ex KGB spy who actually converted to the JW's while infiltrating them is eye opening. i was allowed to borrow the video for free, i think that any JW group anywhere would be willing to let you borrow the video for home viewing. though produced by the church, it is still very well made and worth watching at least once.

User avatar
Kokampf
Member
Posts: 185
Joined: 10 Nov 2002 19:45
Location: London, UK

Post by Kokampf » 19 Apr 2003 02:54

joel pacheco wrote:as far as documentation fron non JW church sources, i have very few. the non church sources are very broad and don't really focus on the JW's too much. the video, which was well produced is still extremely intersting. it includes film clips from actually soviet trials of JW's and soviet anti JW propaganda films(truly bizarre). the video includes interviews with current russian government officials who throw open the files to reveal horror stories of JW persecutions. the interviews are extremely moving, and interview with the ex KGB spy who actually converted to the JW's while infiltrating them is eye opening. i was allowed to borrow the video for free, i think that any JW group anywhere would be willing to let you borrow the video for home viewing. though produced by the church, it is still very well made and worth watching at least once.
What I would be really interested to see would be some context on how this specific treatment compared to that accorded contemporaneously to other Christian sects, which it doesn't sound like this covers. Were they targetted especially because of the American originated organisation of the sect? It certainly sounds full of fascinating material though. However I'd be wary of approaching for fear of being visited repeatedly by Watchtower sellers and having to invite them in to talk out of politeness. :oops: My housemates would not forgive me in a hurry. :)

Dan
Member
Posts: 8429
Joined: 10 Mar 2002 14:06
Location: California

Post by Dan » 19 Apr 2003 03:21

:lol: That's true. I don't think Americanism has anything to do with it, though. I thing is was objecting to fighting, as well, as I have pointed out, totall lack of suport by society.

I have read that during the Great War, the French were the least sympathetic towards conciensious objectors, hanging them as deserters, with the other great powers giving more or less leaway.

I would suggest that any in depth study compare how they were treated in other countries as well. This has been touched upon on this thread vis a vis the Soviet Union, but (having no knowledge of the subject) I would suggest looking at how they were treated in France, GB and the USA to get a clear picture of what went on.

Great thread!!!

Return to “Holocaust & 20th Century War Crimes”