Hmmm. A remarkable opinion by a man who, under his previous nickname, condemned my research in the Parfondruy murder case as:As a footnote, Mr. Clarke, ‘personal opinions’ aren’t worth the bloody paper they are written on. Facts and argumentations with factual data is worth gold – if you hadn’t been born and raised in some American school or some such god awful place, you’d have known what studying real history means. It doesn’t mean enthusiastically shouting ‘I despise this, and that, and that too!’ on some bleeding internet website.
Credibility is gained by factual approach.
I never heared of that place but Its all lies and these "civilians" were helping the Amis and deserved their fate as they were partisans
It seems Facts and argumentations with factual data is worth gold as long as it fits your worship of the SS, dear Thomas.
I am sure that your childhood and education in Nazi Germany gave you perfect understanding of studying real history and that nobody in the Reichs educational system encouraged people to enthusiastically shout I despise this, and that, and that too!, right Standarten?if you hadn’t been born and raised in some American school or some such god awful place, you’d have known what studying real history means. It doesn’t mean enthusiastically shouting ‘I despise this, and that, and that too!’
Karl Ullrich. Now there's credibility (...) gained by factual approach. What's next? Agte's objective opinion again?