[British] war criminals [?]

Discussions on the Holocaust and 20th Century War Crimes. Note that Holocaust denial is not allowed. Hosted by David Thompson.
User avatar
Michael Miller
Forum Staff
Posts: 8923
Joined: 10 Mar 2002 22:05
Location: California

Re: war criminals

Post by Michael Miller » 26 Jul 2022 16:31

Hans1906 wrote:
26 Jul 2022 12:28
Your grandfather is not just a war criminal, he is something far worse.
After 1945, the grandfather was classified as a "follower" by the British military administration in northern Germany.

His last rank was a Major, a desk soldier, a bureaucrat, but fate took the man to other duties.

Do you really think it would have pleased the man to order such a thing, no.
It's easy for us today to condemn something, whoever refused back then was faced with his own firing squad in a few minutes...


Hans
"... whoever refused back then was faced with his own firing squad in a few minutes..."

Not true.

40+ years of reading on the topic and I've yet to see a single example of a German soldier or policeman being executed for refusal to participate in executions.

~ Mike

CogCalgary
Member
Posts: 363
Joined: 04 Aug 2021 21:31
Location: Calgary

Re: war criminals

Post by CogCalgary » 26 Jul 2022 16:36

Michael Miller wrote:
26 Jul 2022 16:31
Hans1906 wrote:
26 Jul 2022 12:28
Your grandfather is not just a war criminal, he is something far worse.
After 1945, the grandfather was classified as a "follower" by the British military administration in northern Germany.

His last rank was a Major, a desk soldier, a bureaucrat, but fate took the man to other duties.

Do you really think it would have pleased the man to order such a thing, no.
It's easy for us today to condemn something, whoever refused back then was faced with his own firing squad in a few minutes...


Hans
"... whoever refused back then was faced with his own firing squad in a few minutes..."

Not true.

40+ years of reading on the topic and I've yet to see a single example of a German soldier or policeman being executed for refusal to participate in executions.

~ Mike
Why would anybody talk about this in some situations?Partisan work?Next soldiers would be looking at you fearing that you would talk?Lots of ways to get rid of dissenters.Simply assigning a soldier to the most dangerous tasks sends a message.Who will flush the partisans out of the cave?

User avatar
Michael Miller
Forum Staff
Posts: 8923
Joined: 10 Mar 2002 22:05
Location: California

Re: war criminals

Post by Michael Miller » 26 Jul 2022 16:56

Not entirely clear what you're saying here, but I repeat: I've yet to see a single example of a German soldier or policeman being executed for refusal to participate in executions.

~ Mike

CogCalgary
Member
Posts: 363
Joined: 04 Aug 2021 21:31
Location: Calgary

Re: war criminals

Post by CogCalgary » 26 Jul 2022 17:50

Partisan work.Yugoslavia.Hunter battalions.Or smaller units.Some spared children.Some apparently did not around Drvar.Never heard of an execution either but assigning soldiers to enter caves will likely have the same result in short order.

User avatar
Michael Miller
Forum Staff
Posts: 8923
Joined: 10 Mar 2002 22:05
Location: California

Re: war criminals

Post by Michael Miller » 26 Jul 2022 18:04

CogCalgary wrote:
26 Jul 2022 17:50
Partisan work.Yugoslavia.Hunter battalions.Or smaller units.Some spared children.Some apparently did not around Drvar.Never heard of an execution either but assigning soldiers to enter caves will likely have the same result in short order.
That's still not a justification for mass killing of unarmed civilians.

~ Mike

CogCalgary
Member
Posts: 363
Joined: 04 Aug 2021 21:31
Location: Calgary

Re: war criminals

Post by CogCalgary » 26 Jul 2022 18:43

Michael Miller wrote:
26 Jul 2022 18:04
CogCalgary wrote:
26 Jul 2022 17:50
Partisan work.Yugoslavia.Hunter battalions.Or smaller units.Some spared children.Some apparently did not around Drvar.Never heard of an execution either but assigning soldiers to enter caves will likely have the same result in short order.
That's still not a justification for mass killing of unarmed civilians.

~ Mike
No.What would you do?You could also try to get rid of your commanding officer with some kind of training accident I suppose.Which has happened according to my
source.Mortar training accident.
"No survivors" was the command and that is all I will say about it.They were getting used like toilet paper.And they did try to kill him in a cave exploding some kind of gas at the entrance.The man ran out the other end of the cave.

gebhk
Member
Posts: 2420
Joined: 25 Feb 2013 20:23

Re: war criminals

Post by gebhk » 26 Jul 2022 20:02

Ooh how we like to judge the behaviour of people in extreme situations from the comfort of our armchairs.

No matter, how about some actual examples of British servicemen being convicted of war crimes, which I seem to remember vaguely was the question asked?

User avatar
Hans1906
Banned
Posts: 4560
Joined: 06 Jan 2020 23:13
Location: Deutschland

Re: war criminals

Post by Hans1906 » 29 Jul 2022 15:29

Ooh how we like to judge the behaviour of people in extreme situations from the comfort of our armchairs.
Hi gebhk,

You got it straight to the point, ordinary people and war crimes, unimaginable, but that's how it was.

It was war, all rules no longer existed.

We're sitting in front of our computer, the men were in a war of annihilation, that was and is the small difference.


Hans
The paradise of the successful lends itself perfectly to a hell for the unsuccessful. (Bertold Brecht on Hollywood)

Puck
Member
Posts: 1125
Joined: 07 Jan 2016 13:54
Location: Germany

Re: war criminals

Post by Puck » 29 Jul 2022 15:54

Hans1906 wrote:
29 Jul 2022 15:29
It was war, all rules no longer existed.
@Hans
Another justification?
Also at this time existed beside the Geneva Convention at least moral rules!
So please stop this "Stammtisch-Niveau" ...

User avatar
Michael Miller
Forum Staff
Posts: 8923
Joined: 10 Mar 2002 22:05
Location: California

Re: war criminals

Post by Michael Miller » 29 Jul 2022 16:21

"It was war, all rules no longer existed."


There most certainly were and are rules, absurd as that may seem at times, and a recognition of that fact is the reason there were war crimes trials and subsequent conventions related to treatment of POWs, to genocide, etc.

To flatly conclude, "it was war, all rules no longer existed" is to endorse the actions of the Einsatzgruppen, among countless other reprehensible crimes.

~ Mike

User avatar
Hans1906
Banned
Posts: 4560
Joined: 06 Jan 2020 23:13
Location: Deutschland

Re: war criminals

Post by Hans1906 » 29 Jul 2022 16:37

Whatever you answer, as a German you are always the villain, the mass murderer, the evil Nazi.

Everyone wore a black uniform, all were members of the Leibstandarte, and all served in German concentration camps to the last.

That's exactly what people think of us, and it's not a new topic.


Hans
The paradise of the successful lends itself perfectly to a hell for the unsuccessful. (Bertold Brecht on Hollywood)

User avatar
Michael Miller
Forum Staff
Posts: 8923
Joined: 10 Mar 2002 22:05
Location: California

Re: war criminals

Post by Michael Miller » 29 Jul 2022 16:39

That response does not address my point. You said there are no rules in war, a claim that has nothing to do with nationalities, and it is flat-out wrong on its face.

Those of us who seriously research this history place no "Mark of Cain" on the heads of all Germans, living or dead. Your claims that such blanket indictments are occurring here are far off the mark.

~ Mike

User avatar
Terry Duncan
Forum Staff
Posts: 6092
Joined: 13 Jun 2008 22:54
Location: Kent

Re: [British] war criminals [?]

Post by Terry Duncan » 29 Jul 2022 19:03

Topic locked until David Thompson has time to review the posts here. Few posts actually deal with any specifics relating to the title.

Terry

Return to “Holocaust & 20th Century War Crimes”