May the dogs die a dog's death - the Jews a Jew's death.
-
- Member
- Posts: 916
- Joined: 21 Jul 2002 11:58
- Location: Italia
May the dogs die a dog's death - the Jews a Jew's death.
After the executions of the accused at the Slánsky Trial, the following news item appeared in Rudé Pravo, the Czech communist newspaper:
The destruction of the center of conspirators against the state, the destruction of the Zionist agents of imperialism in our republic, of this reactionary and hostile ideology and organization, is a victory of humanity over barbarism, a victory of all of our people over its enemies, a victory of peace, of socialism
May the dogs die a dog's death - the Jews a Jew's death.
Maybe can be a interesting page.
http://web.isp.cz/jcrane/Czech/Communismcz.html
Best Regards
Luca
The destruction of the center of conspirators against the state, the destruction of the Zionist agents of imperialism in our republic, of this reactionary and hostile ideology and organization, is a victory of humanity over barbarism, a victory of all of our people over its enemies, a victory of peace, of socialism
May the dogs die a dog's death - the Jews a Jew's death.
Maybe can be a interesting page.
http://web.isp.cz/jcrane/Czech/Communismcz.html
Best Regards
Luca
-
- Forum Staff
- Posts: 23712
- Joined: 20 Jul 2002 19:52
- Location: USA
Luca -- What an unpleasant sentiment on the part of the editors of Rudé Pravo, the Czech communist newspaper. It's of a piece with those signs one reads about which bore captions such as "No dogs or Irishmen (Chinamen, etc.)." The Rudé Pravo editors must not have been familiar with the Judaeo-Bolshevik conspiracy that some folks still believe in.
The article reminded me of the words of William Butler Yeat's quatrain "The Great Day":
The article reminded me of the words of William Butler Yeat's quatrain "The Great Day":
Hurrah for revolution and more cannon-shot!
A beggar on horseback lashes a beggar on foot.
Hurrah for revolution and cannon come again!
The beggars have changed places, but the lash goes on.
-
- Member
- Posts: 1014
- Joined: 18 Dec 2002 12:33
- Location: Honduras
Hi Thompson.....here we goes ........
The ''theory'' of Judeo-Bolshevism'' some believes in, and WHY this had changed at some point, was pretty well explained by me in a message to Demonio less than one week ago,a message you choosed to democratically erase (with no explanation by p.m.) because it went against your beliefs .... so now you plays the innocent who don't know where this comes from....i think it's completely unfair and not up to a man with your historical knowledge.
But i can refresh some memories with the ''conspiracy of the white jackets''. This is the breaking point (first and temporal breakin point)
between communisn and judaism... In the beginning of the 50's Stalin tought he was powerful enough to break with judaism... KGB invented a complot of jewish medics wanted to ,supposedly, assassinate communist leaders in the east. Some real jewish communist leaders (Klement Gottwald in Czechoslovakia, Anna Pauker in Rumania ) were phisically eliminated. At this time all the commie press in the world showed a great deal of antisemitism ,like the sample you are talking about.....
( i note that when the antisemitism comes from the nazis this is awful....when antisemitism comes from communists it's only an ''unpleasant'' sentiment..... it seems you have definitely two measures for explains things)
The Pravda refered to the jews as ''human monsters'' and so on....
In the USA,Eleanor Roosevelt,widow of the president,who had ,like her former husband, the eyes of Ximena for soviet communism,became antisoviet overnight and launched a campaign of support for the soviet jews....in the UssR,meanwhile,lots of jews were deported in Siberia.
The situation ended when the jewish elements of soviet communism regained power with Nikita Krushev (real name :Salomon Pearlmutter).
Stalin was assassinated in the Kremlin,camouflaged as a normal death,and judeo-communism carried on again. Untill the 80's when for another motives soviet communism and judaism divorced again,but that i explained it to Demonio and you erased ,so i guess i can't try to explain it here.....
Before you ask my sources about Stalin's death,i give them :
- ''Derrota Mundial'' by Salvador Borrego,Mexico 1965
-''Infiltracion Mundial'' same author,Mexico 1977
- various articles of french newspaper ''Present'' (by Alain Sanders) and various articles of ''Lectures Francaises'' all of them in the 90's.
And the ''complot of the white jackets'' is always in the memory of the ones with interest to History or old enough to remember,just have a look at the communists newspapers of this time.
The ''theory'' of Judeo-Bolshevism'' some believes in, and WHY this had changed at some point, was pretty well explained by me in a message to Demonio less than one week ago,a message you choosed to democratically erase (with no explanation by p.m.) because it went against your beliefs .... so now you plays the innocent who don't know where this comes from....i think it's completely unfair and not up to a man with your historical knowledge.
But i can refresh some memories with the ''conspiracy of the white jackets''. This is the breaking point (first and temporal breakin point)
between communisn and judaism... In the beginning of the 50's Stalin tought he was powerful enough to break with judaism... KGB invented a complot of jewish medics wanted to ,supposedly, assassinate communist leaders in the east. Some real jewish communist leaders (Klement Gottwald in Czechoslovakia, Anna Pauker in Rumania ) were phisically eliminated. At this time all the commie press in the world showed a great deal of antisemitism ,like the sample you are talking about.....
( i note that when the antisemitism comes from the nazis this is awful....when antisemitism comes from communists it's only an ''unpleasant'' sentiment..... it seems you have definitely two measures for explains things)
The Pravda refered to the jews as ''human monsters'' and so on....
In the USA,Eleanor Roosevelt,widow of the president,who had ,like her former husband, the eyes of Ximena for soviet communism,became antisoviet overnight and launched a campaign of support for the soviet jews....in the UssR,meanwhile,lots of jews were deported in Siberia.
The situation ended when the jewish elements of soviet communism regained power with Nikita Krushev (real name :Salomon Pearlmutter).
Stalin was assassinated in the Kremlin,camouflaged as a normal death,and judeo-communism carried on again. Untill the 80's when for another motives soviet communism and judaism divorced again,but that i explained it to Demonio and you erased ,so i guess i can't try to explain it here.....
Before you ask my sources about Stalin's death,i give them :
- ''Derrota Mundial'' by Salvador Borrego,Mexico 1965
-''Infiltracion Mundial'' same author,Mexico 1977
- various articles of french newspaper ''Present'' (by Alain Sanders) and various articles of ''Lectures Francaises'' all of them in the 90's.
And the ''complot of the white jackets'' is always in the memory of the ones with interest to History or old enough to remember,just have a look at the communists newspapers of this time.
-
- Member
- Posts: 1014
- Joined: 18 Dec 2002 12:33
- Location: Honduras
By the way : Yeats was a member of the Irish Fascist Party (blue shirts) of O'Daffy
and he supported their propaganda to recruit the 600 volunteers of the
Bandera Irlandesa del Tercio (irish volunteers btl. of the Spanish Foreign Legion) who kicked the ass of the british communists of the Brigadas Internacionales during the battle of Jarama,Spain,1937..... These irish volunteers were supported by the aircrafts of the nazi Legion Kondor during this battle. Thanks for mentionned him.
and he supported their propaganda to recruit the 600 volunteers of the
Bandera Irlandesa del Tercio (irish volunteers btl. of the Spanish Foreign Legion) who kicked the ass of the british communists of the Brigadas Internacionales during the battle of Jarama,Spain,1937..... These irish volunteers were supported by the aircrafts of the nazi Legion Kondor during this battle. Thanks for mentionned him.
-
- Member
- Posts: 8982
- Joined: 11 Mar 2002 12:42
- Location: Sydney, Australia
Luca wrote:
I would not be prepared to accept the alleged quote until I had seen the full context. For example, the meaning of the entire article might have been that those of the "conspirators" who were of Jewish origin had betrayed that origin through their alleged conspiracy with "American Imperialism", which in the Communist ideology of that time was seen as the ally of revanchist German fascism, and hence would die like dogs, rather like their fellow Jews who had died as the innocent victims of the Germans. I suspect that that is the meaning of the passage quoted.
The website from which Luca has taken the alleged passage from Rude Pravo seems to be quite judeocentric. It is essentially about the persecution of Jews in Bohemia-Moravia by the German occupiers, and repeats many of the canards about post-war Communist anti-Semitism. The same canards are repeated in the rant bu Ostuf Charlemagne, but in a grosser form; they are all unsupported by historical fact.
The reality is that the 1952 trial of Rudolf Slansky and fourteen other high-ranking Communist leaders was a post-war repetition of the mass purges carried out by Stalin in the Soviet Union in the 1930s, and had much the same cause. All the victims of the pre-war and post-war purges were charged with much the same thing, ie that they were traitors who had allied themselves with the Imperialist enemy (before the war Poland, Germany and Japan, after the war Britain and the United States) and were conducting spying and sabotage. And in all cases Stalin's motivation was essentially the same; to prevent the emergence of any rivals to his personal power by constantly purging individuals and groups who had some measure of local power and replacing them with "new men", who would then be purged in their turn when they had developed their own power centres.
The fact that 11 of the 15 "conspirators" at the Slansky Trial were of Jewish origin simply reflects the overrepresentation of Jews in the Czech Communist Party. The same was true of the Communist Parties in Poland, Hungary and Romania.
The website at issue engages in distortion when it states that the Jewishness of those 11 was particularly stressed; in fact, the ethnic origin of all 15 defendants was stated, in conformity with the normal practice in multi-ethnic East European states; probably of more consequence for the instigators of the trial was the description of the class origin of the defendants (eg "from a family of businessmen", "son of a merchant and innkeeper", "son of a doctor of medicine"), designed to portray them as not of worker or peasant origin and hence untrustworthy.
The pre-war purges in the Soviet Union also claimed many Jewish victims, both at the highest level, eg the former Bolshevik leaders Kamenev and Zinoviev, and also at the middle and lower levels. But that simply reflects the over-representation of persons of Jewish origin at both the higher and middle levels of the Communist Party and also in the bureaucratic and managerial class that was targeted during the Great Terror of 1936-38.
It is noteworthy that during the purges of the 1930s, one of the standard allegations made against arrested members of so-called "anti-Party", "counterrevolutionary" groups was "carrying on anti-Semitic propaganda, demanding the application of fascist methods of counterrevolutionary operation - ie the organisation of Hitlerite pogroms" (quoted from the memo of Shkiriatov to Kaganovich, 3 September 1933, RTsKhIDNI, f. 17, op. 120, d. 106, ll. 56, 560b). Hardly an indication of anti-Semitism as a component of the Stalinist world-view! And it needs to be remembered that anti-Semitism was a crime in the Soviet Union under Stalin, punishable by death.
Now, it is a fact that by 1952 Stalin had adopted a strongly anti-Zionist position which he imposed on the satellite states also. That position had two sources. First, there had always been rivalry between the Jewish Bolsheviks and the Jewish socialist Zionists over the best way to solve the "Jewish Problem"; the former saw the answer in the absorption of the corrupt class of petty Jewish traders into a multi-ethnic socialist society, the latter saw the answer in the withdrawal of that same corrupt class from the gentile environment and its "rebirth" through labour in a separate Jewish socialist state. That dispute between Zionist and non-Zionist Jewish socialists mirrored the conflict between Zionist and non-Zionist Jews generally. It was entirely possible for a Jew, whether Communist or non-Communist, to oppose the Zionist solution without losing one iota of his Jewish identity.
Second, by 1952 the new Zionist state under the leadership of Ben Gurion had aligned itself with the West in the Cold War, contrary to the wishes of the more leftist Zionists, eg the Mappam Party, who had wanted to join the non-aligned bloc, with a tilt toward the Soviet Union. That was a great disappointment for Stalin, who had provided vital military support to the Zionist state in 1948, in the expectation that it would become a Soviet ally and a base for subversion of British domination of the Middle East.
Thus, Stalin's disappointment with Zionism led him to include it as one of the "enemies" for which his rivals were supposedly working, along with the intelligence services of the United States and Britain.
It is a pity that the moderator, in his initial response to this matter raised by Luca, did not exercise his normal praiseworthy scepticism toward claims unsupported by hard evidence.
I would be wary of accepting the translation of an alleged quote from Rude Pravo at face value. No source is given, ie date of publication, page number etc, or at least a trustworthy secondary source.After the executions of the accused at the Slánsky Trial, the following news item appeared in Rudé Pravo, the Czech communist newspaper:
I would not be prepared to accept the alleged quote until I had seen the full context. For example, the meaning of the entire article might have been that those of the "conspirators" who were of Jewish origin had betrayed that origin through their alleged conspiracy with "American Imperialism", which in the Communist ideology of that time was seen as the ally of revanchist German fascism, and hence would die like dogs, rather like their fellow Jews who had died as the innocent victims of the Germans. I suspect that that is the meaning of the passage quoted.
The website from which Luca has taken the alleged passage from Rude Pravo seems to be quite judeocentric. It is essentially about the persecution of Jews in Bohemia-Moravia by the German occupiers, and repeats many of the canards about post-war Communist anti-Semitism. The same canards are repeated in the rant bu Ostuf Charlemagne, but in a grosser form; they are all unsupported by historical fact.
The reality is that the 1952 trial of Rudolf Slansky and fourteen other high-ranking Communist leaders was a post-war repetition of the mass purges carried out by Stalin in the Soviet Union in the 1930s, and had much the same cause. All the victims of the pre-war and post-war purges were charged with much the same thing, ie that they were traitors who had allied themselves with the Imperialist enemy (before the war Poland, Germany and Japan, after the war Britain and the United States) and were conducting spying and sabotage. And in all cases Stalin's motivation was essentially the same; to prevent the emergence of any rivals to his personal power by constantly purging individuals and groups who had some measure of local power and replacing them with "new men", who would then be purged in their turn when they had developed their own power centres.
The fact that 11 of the 15 "conspirators" at the Slansky Trial were of Jewish origin simply reflects the overrepresentation of Jews in the Czech Communist Party. The same was true of the Communist Parties in Poland, Hungary and Romania.
The website at issue engages in distortion when it states that the Jewishness of those 11 was particularly stressed; in fact, the ethnic origin of all 15 defendants was stated, in conformity with the normal practice in multi-ethnic East European states; probably of more consequence for the instigators of the trial was the description of the class origin of the defendants (eg "from a family of businessmen", "son of a merchant and innkeeper", "son of a doctor of medicine"), designed to portray them as not of worker or peasant origin and hence untrustworthy.
The pre-war purges in the Soviet Union also claimed many Jewish victims, both at the highest level, eg the former Bolshevik leaders Kamenev and Zinoviev, and also at the middle and lower levels. But that simply reflects the over-representation of persons of Jewish origin at both the higher and middle levels of the Communist Party and also in the bureaucratic and managerial class that was targeted during the Great Terror of 1936-38.
It is noteworthy that during the purges of the 1930s, one of the standard allegations made against arrested members of so-called "anti-Party", "counterrevolutionary" groups was "carrying on anti-Semitic propaganda, demanding the application of fascist methods of counterrevolutionary operation - ie the organisation of Hitlerite pogroms" (quoted from the memo of Shkiriatov to Kaganovich, 3 September 1933, RTsKhIDNI, f. 17, op. 120, d. 106, ll. 56, 560b). Hardly an indication of anti-Semitism as a component of the Stalinist world-view! And it needs to be remembered that anti-Semitism was a crime in the Soviet Union under Stalin, punishable by death.
Now, it is a fact that by 1952 Stalin had adopted a strongly anti-Zionist position which he imposed on the satellite states also. That position had two sources. First, there had always been rivalry between the Jewish Bolsheviks and the Jewish socialist Zionists over the best way to solve the "Jewish Problem"; the former saw the answer in the absorption of the corrupt class of petty Jewish traders into a multi-ethnic socialist society, the latter saw the answer in the withdrawal of that same corrupt class from the gentile environment and its "rebirth" through labour in a separate Jewish socialist state. That dispute between Zionist and non-Zionist Jewish socialists mirrored the conflict between Zionist and non-Zionist Jews generally. It was entirely possible for a Jew, whether Communist or non-Communist, to oppose the Zionist solution without losing one iota of his Jewish identity.
Second, by 1952 the new Zionist state under the leadership of Ben Gurion had aligned itself with the West in the Cold War, contrary to the wishes of the more leftist Zionists, eg the Mappam Party, who had wanted to join the non-aligned bloc, with a tilt toward the Soviet Union. That was a great disappointment for Stalin, who had provided vital military support to the Zionist state in 1948, in the expectation that it would become a Soviet ally and a base for subversion of British domination of the Middle East.
Thus, Stalin's disappointment with Zionism led him to include it as one of the "enemies" for which his rivals were supposedly working, along with the intelligence services of the United States and Britain.
It is a pity that the moderator, in his initial response to this matter raised by Luca, did not exercise his normal praiseworthy scepticism toward claims unsupported by hard evidence.
-
- Member
- Posts: 8429
- Joined: 10 Mar 2002 14:06
- Location: California
-
- Member
- Posts: 8982
- Joined: 11 Mar 2002 12:42
- Location: Sydney, Australia
An airforce was assembled in Czechoslovakia, consisting of captured German aircraft, including Messerschmidt fighters, bombers and transports.I never would have even guessed about the Soviet aid which was instrumental in establishing Israel without posts like this.
Large numbers of young Jewish survivors and refugees were given military training, both in Czechoslovakia and in Lviv, in Soviet Ukraine. Interestingly, no account seems to have been taken of the political orientation of the persons being trained; thus it is that our knowledge of the military training on Soviet territory derives from the memoirs of Jewish rightists, whereas the leftist Mappai establishment has always tried to hide the Soviet support as far as possible.
After Medinat Yisrael declared its independence in May 1948, the airforce took off from Czechoslovakia, with Jewish pilots and carrying the trained men. It made a refuelling stop, and then continued to airfields in the new Jewish state. The bombers made a detour en route, flying over Cairo and bombing it before landing in Medinat Yisrael.
The arrival of the airforce and the trained men gave the Jewish side the decisive edge over the armies of the Arab states which had begun to enter Palestine to assist the hard-pressed Palestinian Arab forces, which had been effectively defeated during the interval between the UN partition resolution in November 1947 and the British departure in May 1948.
-
- Member
- Posts: 1014
- Joined: 18 Dec 2002 12:33
- Location: Honduras
Here i am with my grosser mode !
1) And after that ,some will says that Judeo-Bolshevism was a Nazi myth?!
2) But in the case of the israeli air force mounted on Messerschmidts this was not done by the communists...remember that Czechoslovakia was a free country from 1945 to 1948 (the year of the communist coup),and those german airplanes were provided to the jews before this coup.
3) It seems that even with the grossier mode,my messages awake some interest to readers who had no idea about those facts...
1) And after that ,some will says that Judeo-Bolshevism was a Nazi myth?!
2) But in the case of the israeli air force mounted on Messerschmidts this was not done by the communists...remember that Czechoslovakia was a free country from 1945 to 1948 (the year of the communist coup),and those german airplanes were provided to the jews before this coup.
3) It seems that even with the grossier mode,my messages awake some interest to readers who had no idea about those facts...
-
- Member
- Posts: 349
- Joined: 17 Nov 2002 18:17
- Location: USA/UK
-
- Member
- Posts: 8982
- Joined: 11 Mar 2002 12:42
- Location: Sydney, Australia
-
- Member
- Posts: 8982
- Joined: 11 Mar 2002 12:42
- Location: Sydney, Australia
Ostuf Charlemagne wrote:
The non-Communist ministers in the Masaryk Government were simply there for window-dressing. The Communist ministers could do pretty much as they liked, and providing military assistance to the Jews in the Palestine conflict was one of things they did on Stalin's orders.
Yes, it was done by the Czech Communists, who controlled the Ministry of Defence and all the armed forces and the police even before the coup.2) But in the case of the israeli air force mounted on Messerschmidts this was not done by the communists...remember that Czechoslovakia was a free country from 1945 to 1948 (the year of the communist coup),and those german airplanes were provided to the jews before this coup.
The non-Communist ministers in the Masaryk Government were simply there for window-dressing. The Communist ministers could do pretty much as they liked, and providing military assistance to the Jews in the Palestine conflict was one of things they did on Stalin's orders.
-
- Member
- Posts: 803
- Joined: 09 Nov 2002 20:00
- Location: Südamerika - Brazil
-
- Forum Staff
- Posts: 23712
- Joined: 20 Jul 2002 19:52
- Location: USA
Ostuf Charlemagne -- You said:
You are mistaken. I moved your post to The Lounge, and did not delete it. The Lounge has its own capable moderator, who handles matter posted there."The ''theory'' of Judeo-Bolshevism'' some believes in, and WHY this had changed at some point, was pretty well explained by me in a message to Demonio less than one week ago,a message you choosed to democratically erase (with no explanation by p.m.) because it went against your beliefs .... so now you plays the innocent who don't know where this comes from....i think it's completely unfair and not up to a man with your historical knowledge."
-
- Forum Staff
- Posts: 23712
- Joined: 20 Jul 2002 19:52
- Location: USA
A post from flak_turm asking a question about airfields in the 1956 Arab-Israeli conflict was moved to http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?t=71524
-
- Member
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: 03 Oct 2004 20:52
- Location: Germany
Nikita Khrushchev=Salomon Pearlmutter (wich by the way is english)...
what an utter nonsense.
I guess now you will run up with dozens "facts" and "proofs" from some suspicious "sources" to prove that Khrushchev was a Jew.
Seriously... There of course were plenty Jewish Communists but this one is absolutely ridiculous.

I guess now you will run up with dozens "facts" and "proofs" from some suspicious "sources" to prove that Khrushchev was a Jew.
