And you seem to think that the Allies were above forgery (although the only documents where I definitely suspect that this might be the case are the Bischoff-Kammler "Vergasungskeller" document and the Becker-Rauff "Gas-Van" documents.
1. Is that so, Mr. Smith? On what grounds – other than their obvious inconvenience to your Faith – do you believe the documents in question to be forgeries?
2. If those mentioned are the only ones that Smith suspects to be forgeries, this means that he has no doubt about the authenticity of other documents related to the Nazis’ crimes. Such as the Korherr Report, the Höfle memorandum, the Einsatzgruppen
Operational Situation Reports, Greiser’s letter to Himmler of 1 May 1942, Ganzenmüller’s letter to Wolff of 28.07.1942, the memoranda of the Auschwitz-Birkenau Bauleitung
dated 29.01.1943 and 28.06.1943, Goebbels’ diary entries and the records of Himmler’s speeches at Posen on the 4th and 6th of October 1943, among many others. Very instructive. That being so, I assume that Smith also has no doubts about the authenticity of e.g. the letter sent by SS – Gruppenführer Dr. Turner to Karl Wolff, chief of Himmler's personal staff, on April 11, 1942. This letter is transcribed and scanned in under the link
and translated there as follows:
Privy Councillor Dr. Turner
F.P.Number 18.739 O.U., April 11, 1942
Dear Comrade Wolff!
Now that the decision has been taken in my favor, I would be remiss - since I am convinced that this is singularly and only thanks to your influence and your tireless activity - if I did not transmit to you my most comradely and heartfelt thanks.
I can also again today, the more so since you know me well enough, only again repeat, that the matter did not have to do with my person - the person concerned could have just as easily had another name - but rather with a necessary battle that had to be fought against one-sided Wehrmacht interests, by which in the final unspoken result the SS Leaders, and therewith also the SS and further also the civil servants would have been affected.
The best proof for this is, on the one hand, a remark woven into an official document from WB Southeast "the appointment of the Higher SS and Police Leader, which did not take place according to the proposal here" or words to that effect, and on the other hand, the comment of the Chief of the General Staff WB Southeast after receipt of the decision in my favor "herewith the Wehrmacht has lost a battle".
In any event, there reigns here in all circles, even the Wehrmacht who have in any way followed this struggle, only joy over this victory and this joy you have alone, as I see it, afforded these people. My thanks for that.
May I use this occasion to send you as an attachment a copy of a letter from me to the Reichsführer of January 15, 1942 to which I have yet to receive an answer. I am not complaining because as I know, such things take time and I don't feel it is right for me to press the Reichsführer for the settlement of an affair. I know that for such matters you have an interest and the reason I now draw your attention to it is only because this question is now more than critical. Already some months ago, I shot dead all the Jews I could get my hands on in this area, concentrated all the Jewish women and children in a camp and with the help of the SD got my hands on a "delousing van," that in about 14 days to 4 weeks will have brought about the definitive clearing out of the camp, which in any event since the arrival of Meyssner and the turning over of this camp to him, was continued by him. Then the time is come in which the Jewish officers to be found in prisoner of war camps under the Geneva Convention find out against our will about their no longer existing kinfolk and that could easily lead to complications.
Were the affected persons now to be freed, they would in the minute of the arrival have their ultimate freedom, but like their racial comrades not for very long, and then this entire question should be resolved once and for all. Any consideration could have counter-effects on our prisoners in Canada, if it comes out that the freed persons do not move around freely here... I personally do not agree with this consideration.
With best wishes for your personal well being, heartiest greetings and
I am as always
Emphasis is mine.
What was Turner talking about in the highlighted passage, Mr. Smith?
Treblinka was literally buried and replanted;
Yes, the evil Nazi gardeners managed to put the earth back to ancient conditions as though undisturbed by human hands, if we are to believe the ground-penetrating radar report, which has never even been attempted by Nizkor. Why should they make any empirical observations? Their job is damage-control not real history.
The Central Commission for the Investigation of German Crimes in Poland described the Treblinka burial site as follows:
There are also other traces. For example, in the north-eastern part, over a surface covering about 2 ha. (5 acres),
there are large quantities of ashes mixed with sand, among which are numerous human bones, often with the remains of decomposing tissues.
As a result of an examination made by an expert it was found that ashes were the remains of burnt human bones. The examination of numerous human skulls found in the camp has shown that they bear no traces of external injuries. Within a radius of several hundred yards from the camp site an unpleasant smell of burnt ash and decay is noticeable, growing stronger as one approaches.
From the report by the Central Commission for Investigation of German Crimes in Poland. Warsaw, 1946
Source of quote:
The condition in which the Central Commission found the Treblinka burial site was not the one in which the SS had left it, but resulted from a bizarre phenomenon known as "The Treblinka Gold Rush", which happened when the Ukranian the Germans left behind to guard the site fled before the advancing Red Army. At that time huge numbers of locals and others dug through the ground looking for "Jew-gold" (Golczewski in Benz et al, Dimensionen des Völkermords
, quoting Alexander Donat's Treblinka
Yet despite all that digging, the “Revisionist” ground penetrating radar found no traces of soil disturbance, which arouses the suspicion that the fellow who operated it didn’t find anything because he badly wanted to find nothing. Which in turn is not surprising, given that the job of these people is not real history but ideologically motivated propaganda.
Yes, the Nazis managed to destroy millions of human teeth, planted in the Treblinka soil a half-century ago and waiting for the intellectually curious to find and lay the objections of the Deniers to rest.
1. What makes the “intellectually curious” think that human teeth will necessarily survive incineration of the bodies on grids such as was done at Treblinka and the other Aktion Reinhard(t)
2. If the “intellectually curious” have a problem with the notion that the burnt remains of hundreds of thousands of people lie under the ground of the Treblinka burial site, despite the fact that the burial space was more than enough to accommodate the number of dead that becomes apparent from the documentary evidence and the detailed and coincident depositions and testimonials of dozens of people who either carried out the killing or witnessed it at first hand, do they also have an alternative explanation as to what became of, say, the 713,555 Jews from the General Government who, according to the Höfle memorandum, were taken to Treblinka until the end of 1942? Or does their “intellectual curiosity” not go as far as trying to find out what happened to hundreds of thousands of people who they against all evidence maintain were not killed at a certain time and place?