Sailor wrote:Says tonyh:
>>Maybe you don't understand what the Sonderkomando were. They were Jewish prisoners who would eventually be gassed or killed in some manner, then is little to no need to protect them from residual HCN.<<
I know exactly what the Sonderkomando was and what their usual ethnic orientation was. However, I simply do not buy the assertion that the SS would send them into a gas chamber without some form of protection, regardless of how they "felt" about them. It makes no sense at all. If something, ie the Sonderkomando, is an integral part of an operation, ie gassing, then there is no point in having that integral part of your operation dying in mid operation, thus severely holding up the entire operation and limiting the amount of Jews etc gassed. Remember, this was supposedly a 24 hr industrial operation.
Tony
Sailor wrote:Also please note:
The thesis of the worthlessness of the inmates is not believable considering the expenses and efforts of the SS especially in the area to prevent epedemics and of healthcare.
Now that's sharp reasoning. Measures to prevent epidemics were aimed at keeping up the functioning of the camp, which would have been seriously upset by major outbreaks of contagious diseases (which moreover would also affect the guard personnel). It doesn't mean that the inmates had any worth in the eyes of their captors.
What "efforts of the SS especially in the area to prevent epedemics and of healthcare" is Sailor talking about, by the way?
Sailor wrote:Even if the lifes of the inmates were of little value in the eyes of the SS, they would be careful to loose the carriers of these ‘secrets’ and then have to make more and more people familiar with the ‘murder secrets’ in order to do the work.
Certainly so. But there was no risk of losing them due to exposure to the residual amounts of HCN left after gassing and ventilation, was there? In the DIRECTIVES FOR THE USE OF PRUSSIC ACID (ZYKLON)
FOR THE DESTRUCTION OF VERMIN (DISINFESTATION) featured on Porter's web site the following is written:
Since prussic acid has practically no indicative irritant effect, it is highly toxic and very dangerous. Prussic acid is one of the most powerful poisons. 1 mg per kg of body weight is sufficient to kill a human being. Women and children are generally more susceptible than men. Very small amounts of prussic acid do not harm the human body, even if breathed continuously.
Emphasis is mine.
Sailor wrote:Additionally many survivors of the Sonderkommano were working for years, 2-3 years doing this work in the alleged gas chambers without ill effect.
Which would suggest that absorption by the victims and subsequent ventilation were so effective that the
Sonderkommando were never exposed to more than the "very small amounts" mentioned in the above quoted directives.
Sailor wrote:There are no witnesses who testified that members of the “Sonderkommandos” were gas poisoned during work in the alleged gas chambers.
Which would suggest ... (see above).
Now an easy little question for Mr. Sailor:
In his diary submitted as evidence at the trial before the Landgericht Münster that ended with the court's verdict of 29.11.1960, SS physician Dr. Johann Paul Kremer wrote the following:
2.Septb. 1942.
Zum 1. Male um 3 Uhr früh bei einer Sonderaktion zugegen. Im Vergleich hierzu erscheint mir das Dante'sche Inferno fast wie eine Komödie. Umsonst wird Auschwitz nicht das Lager der Vernichtung genannt!
Source of quote:
http://www.jur.uva.nl/junsv/Excerpts/Kremer003.htm
My translation:
2 September 1942.
For the first time at three o'clock in the morning I was present at a special action. Compared thereto Dante's Inferno seemed almost like a comedy to me. They don't call Auschwitz the camp of annihilation for nothing!
What was this "special action", so much worse than Dante's Inferno, that Kremer was talking about?