Nice catchXanthro wrote:Odd that you reserve to yourself the right to determine who is and who isn't to be treated as a human, and yet you argue absolute on other threads.atkif wrote:Xanthro .
Do you think that the smiling person on the above photograph can be treated as a human being ?
"The attitude these killers take'' was not caused by the actions of the victims. It resulted from their nationalities (Jews) or their views (Commies).
The actions like these (mass killings of the innocents) exclude the perpetrators from the human race. This is my belief.
Rarely do mass murders explain their actions based upon the victims nationality, but do so based on what it is claimed those nationalities have done or will do.
Our murderous subject above didn't view his victims as Communists, but as people who have abused and mistreated his people. Just as you are trying to view others.
It's a dangerous slope to try and stand on, when you think you can determine who is and who isn't a human.
Xanthro
"Death Dealer of Kavnas(Kovno)"
Scott Smith wrote:Roberto wrote:For a pedophile I wouldn't move a finger myself.Dan wrote:I personally have stopped beatings in Africa, often with the use of force, but in the case of paedophiles, I would stop you from stopping the beating.
The hypothetical case, my dear Smith, involves certainty derived from a final verdict in a fair contradictory trial or my own observation.Scott Smith wrote:How do you know that the pedophile is guilty? Mobs are not very good and determining such truths.
If that's supposed to be funny, Smith's sense of humor sucks.Scott Smith wrote:And how do you know that?But those beaten to death by the "Death Dealer" had never harmed anyone.
The poor fellow may actually have meant it in earnest, however. The victims were Jews, after all.
O.K.I am ready to learn from you. What is your suggestion -how such persons (those who are guilty of mass murder of innocents) should be treated ?Xanthro wrote: Odd that you reserve to yourself the right to determine who is and who isn't to be treated as a human, and yet you argue absolute on other threads.
Psychological counselling perhaps ? Give me some idea please..
Yes it is my firm conviction -persons who don't have basic human quality -- humanity can not be really called humans.It's a dangerous slope to try and stand on, when you think you can determine who is and who isn't a human.
This is not to say that I am in the position to decide what to do with this scum.I am not assuming a role of a prosecutor .So I don't represent any danger of "unfair trial" to these persons.
They should be tried in a fair trial where they are allowed a defense and the ability to cross examine witnesses and the evidence presented against them. If found guilty they should be executed or imprisoned for their remaining life. Thus, they are treated like any other criminal.O.K.I am ready to learn from you. What is your suggestion -how such persons (those who are guilty of mass murder of innocents) should be treated ?Xanthro wrote:
Odd that you reserve to yourself the right to determine who is and who isn't to be treated as a human, and yet you argue absolute on other threads.
Psychological counselling perhaps ? Give me some idea please..
What shouldn't happen is people decide the guilt of these people and apply a punishment, because that is what the criminal did.
Xanthro
As I said I am not a prosecutor.Neither am I an investigator.I don't blame any concrete person.What shouldn't happen is people decide the guilt of these people and apply a punishment, because that is what the criminal did
What I am sayng is that such persons who really committed such crimes
are not entirely humans to me.This is my opinion which I believe I am entitled to have.
I'm not trying to change your opinion, just pointing out that it's the same opinion as shared by those murderers in question. Just as you feel they aren't entirely human, they felt their victims weren't entirely human either.atkif wrote:As I said I am not a prosecutor.Neither am I an investigator.I don't blame any concrete person.What shouldn't happen is people decide the guilt of these people and apply a punishment, because that is what the criminal did
What I am sayng is that such persons who really committed such crimes
are not entirely humans to me.This is my opinion which I believe I am entitled to have.
Xanthro
- Scott Smith
- Member
- Posts: 5602
- Joined: 10 Mar 2002, 22:17
- Location: Arizona
- Contact:
Then why the mob violence, my dear Roberto? After all, the legitimacy of justice revolves around the ability of the State to satisfactorily provide a monopoly of force and law.Roberto wrote:The hypothetical case, my dear Smith, involves certainty derived from a final verdict in a fair contradictory trial or my own observation.Scott Smith wrote:How do you know that the pedophile is guilty? Mobs are not very good and determining such truths.Roberto wrote:For a pedophile I wouldn't move a finger myself.Dan wrote:I personally have stopped beatings in Africa, often with the use of force, but in the case of paedophiles, I would stop you from stopping the beating.
Not that this would excuse mob violence, of course, but assuming that the Victims (note the use of the capital letter) were in fact all Jews, how do you know that some of these Jews were not in fact Bolshevists or collaborators with the Soviets and their brutal Baltic occupation?Roberto wrote:If that's supposed to be funny, Smith's sense of humor sucks.Scott Smith wrote:And how do you know that?Roberto wrote:But those beaten to death by the "Death Dealer" had never harmed anyone.
The poor fellow may actually have meant it in earnest, however. The victims were Jews, after all.
Roberto wrote:The hypothetical case, my dear Smith, involves certainty derived from a final verdict in a fair contradictory trial or my own observation.
When a convicted child molester is taken to jail after trial, the mob is sometimes waiting outside the courtroom to lynch him. It has happened here in Portugal.Scott Smith wrote:Then why the mob violence, my dear Roberto?
That's why cops protect the fellow from the mob in such cases. Boy, I'd hate to be one of them.Scott Smith wrote:After all, the legitimacy of justice revolves around the ability of the State to satisfactorily provide a monopoly of force and law.
I'd say the question should be asked the other way round: How do you know they were?Scott Smith wrote:Not that this would excuse mob violence, of course, but assuming that the victims (note the use of the capital letter) were in fact all Jews, how do you know that some of these Jews were not in fact Bolshevists or collaborators with the Soviets and their brutal Baltic occupation?
The burden of proof for the victims' culpability (as an extenuating circumstance) is on you, counselor.
- Scott Smith
- Member
- Posts: 5602
- Joined: 10 Mar 2002, 22:17
- Location: Arizona
- Contact:
Mob Rule...
Maybe the Portuguese need to get out a little more; life must be pretty dull without such medieval soap operas. Burn, Witch, Burn!Roberto wrote:When a convicted child molester is taken to jail after trial, the mob is sometimes waiting outside the courtroom to lynch him. It has happened here in Portugal.Scott Smith wrote:Then why the mob violence, my dear Roberto?
I never said anything one way or another. And I really don't care.Roberto wrote:I'd say the question should be asked the other way round: How do you know they were?Scott Smith wrote:Not that this would excuse mob violence, of course, but assuming that the Victims (note the use of the capital letter) were in fact all Jews, how do you know that some of these Jews were not in fact Bolshevists or collaborators with the Soviets and their brutal Baltic occupation?
No, the implied premise in your argument was that this was nothing but Genocide or mindless Hate--with no extenuating circumstances, or any circumstances, beyond that the victims were Jews (which isn't even demonstrated). I have made no claims about it whatsoever, nor am I defending such massacres as this photo purports to be.The burden of proof for the victims' culpability (as an extenuating circumstance) is on you, counselor.
Re: Mob Rule...
Roberto wrote:When a convicted child molester is taken to jail after trial, the mob is sometimes waiting outside the courtroom to lynch him. It has happened here in Portugal.
I know (i.a. from your persistent efforts to portray them as "witches" hunted by "medieval inquisition") that you sympathize with mass murderers, Smith.Scott Smith wrote:Maybe the Portuguese need to get out a little more; life must be pretty dull without such medieval soap operas. Burn, Witch, Burn!
Do you now also sympathize with child molesters?
Or are you just trying to insult a country you don't know a damn thing about because I happen to live there?
Scott Smith wrote:Not that this would excuse mob violence, of course, but assuming that the Victims (note the use of the capital letter) were in fact all Jews, how do you know that some of these Jews were not in fact Bolshevists or collaborators with the Soviets and their brutal Baltic occupation?
Roberto wrote:I'd say the question should be asked the other way round: How do you know they were?
That's it, doggy. Withdraw with your tail between your legs when you've messed up.Smith wrote:I never said anything one way or another. And I really don't care.
Roberto wrote:The burden of proof for the victims' culpability (as an extenuating circumstance) is on you, counselor.
Well, Smith, unless someone can prove that the victims were hideous Bolshevik monsters, what stands for the record is that the fellow hated Jews and butchered a number of them because your beloved Nazis gave him a chance to do so. Nothing else.Smith wrote:No, the implied premise in your argument was that this was nothing but Genocide or mindless Hate--with no extenuating circumstances, or any circumstances, beyond that the victims were Jews (which isn't even demonstrated).
Didn't you?Smith wrote:I have made no claims about it whatsoever,
Then what was that "how do we know they were not Bolsheviks/Soviet collaborators" stuff supposed to mean?
Why "purports", my dear boy?Smith wrote:nor am I defending such massacres as this photo purports to be.
Because you know of evidence that the photo was staged or forged, or just because it shows an event that doesn't fit into your ideological bubble?
- Scott Smith
- Member
- Posts: 5602
- Joined: 10 Mar 2002, 22:17
- Location: Arizona
- Contact:
Sounds Like Somebody Needs Another Hug...
No, I can surely continue with Is-Too/Is-Not but I don't want to annoy the moderator with off-topic replies to your silly accusations.Roberto wrote:That's it, doggy. Withdraw with your tail between your legs when you've messed up.
Re: Sounds Like Somebody Needs Another Hug...
If I had been saved by the moderator's gong like Smith was, I wouldn't open my mouth so wide.Scott Smith wrote:No, I can surely continue with Is-Too/Is-Not but I don't want to annoy the moderator with off-topic replies to your silly accusations.Roberto wrote:That's it, doggy. Withdraw with your tail between your legs when you've messed up.
But never mind.
As I also don't want to annoy the moderator, I'll leave it to our audience to decide what "silly accusations" I made that were not warranted by Smith's statements.
Have a nice evening, old pal.
-
- Member
- Posts: 9000
- Joined: 11 Mar 2002, 13:42
- Location: Sydney, Australia
There are two versions of the lynching that occurred at the Lietukis garage in Kaunas, as shown in the photograph.
One is the version put out by the Soviet Government, according to which the lynch mob consisted of common criminals who had escaped or been released from jail after the Soviet authorities fled. The victims of the mob were supposedly innocent Jews.
The other version is that put out by Lithuanian nationalists. According to it, a number of members of anti-Soviet nationalist organisations had been imprisoned by the Soviet authorities. Upon receiving news of the German invasion, relatives of the imprisoned men went to the jails and released them. A number of Soviet political policemen and agents were captured and brought to the Lietukis garage. When the nationalists released from prison and their liberators found the Soviet agents being held at the garage, they took the law into their own hands and lynched them. It is quite possible that there were Jews among those killed, since there were many Jews among those who collaborated with the Soviet occupiers, but according to this version they were not innocent Jews rounded up on the streets.
The lynchings at the Lietukis garage are probably to be compared with the public lynchings of Hungarian AVO men during the uprising in October 1956. Irving, in his book "Uprising", has used the word "pogrom" to describe those lynchings, and he may well have been justified in doing so. But the salient fact is that the lynchings of the Hungarian AVO men, while considered shocking, have not generally been described in Western historiography as a crime.
One is the version put out by the Soviet Government, according to which the lynch mob consisted of common criminals who had escaped or been released from jail after the Soviet authorities fled. The victims of the mob were supposedly innocent Jews.
The other version is that put out by Lithuanian nationalists. According to it, a number of members of anti-Soviet nationalist organisations had been imprisoned by the Soviet authorities. Upon receiving news of the German invasion, relatives of the imprisoned men went to the jails and released them. A number of Soviet political policemen and agents were captured and brought to the Lietukis garage. When the nationalists released from prison and their liberators found the Soviet agents being held at the garage, they took the law into their own hands and lynched them. It is quite possible that there were Jews among those killed, since there were many Jews among those who collaborated with the Soviet occupiers, but according to this version they were not innocent Jews rounded up on the streets.
The lynchings at the Lietukis garage are probably to be compared with the public lynchings of Hungarian AVO men during the uprising in October 1956. Irving, in his book "Uprising", has used the word "pogrom" to describe those lynchings, and he may well have been justified in doing so. But the salient fact is that the lynchings of the Hungarian AVO men, while considered shocking, have not generally been described in Western historiography as a crime.
Consider Michael Mills’ assessment in the light of the reference to the events at Kaunas/Kovno in the letter of the Navy Liaison Officer at Army Group North to his superior of 22.9.1941 (Bundesarchiv/Militärarchiv, RM 7/1014, Bl. 39-41):michael mills wrote:There are two versions of the lynching that occurred at the Lietukis garage in Kaunas, as shown in the photograph.
One is the version put out by the Soviet Government, according to which the lynch mob consisted of common criminals who had escaped or been released from jail after the Soviet authorities fled. The victims of the mob were supposedly innocent Jews.
The other version is that put out by Lithuanian nationalists. According to it, a number of members of anti-Soviet nationalist organisations had been imprisoned by the Soviet authorities. Upon receiving news of the German invasion, relatives of the imprisoned men went to the jails and released them. A number of Soviet political policemen and agents were captured and brought to the Lietukis garage. When the nationalists released from prison and their liberators found the Soviet agents being held at the garage, they took the law into their own hands and lynched them. It is quite possible that there were Jews among those killed, since there were many Jews among those who collaborated with the Soviet occupiers, but according to this version they were not innocent Jews rounded up on the streets.
The lynchings at the Lietukis garage are probably to be compared with the public lynchings of Hungarian AVO men during the uprising in October 1956. Irving, in his book "Uprising", has used the word "pogrom" to describe those lynchings, and he may well have been justified in doing so. But the salient fact is that the lynchings of the Hungarian AVO men, while considered shocking, have not generally been described in Western historiography as a crime.
My translation:[…]Vermutlich soll die Stadt durch Artillerie, Bomben, Feuer, Hunger und Kälte vernichtet werden, ohne dass ein deutscher Soldat ihren Boden betritt.
Ich persönlich möchte bezweifeln, dass das bei der unglaublichen Zähigkeit des russischen Menschen gelingt. M.E. lassen sich nicht 4 - 5 Millionen Menschen so einfach umbringen.
Ich habe das aus eigener Anschauung in Kowno gesehen, wo die Letten
6 000 Juden erschossen haben, darunter Frauen und Kinder. Selbst ein so rohes Volk wie die Letten konnten dieses Morden schliesslich nicht mehr mit ansehen. Die ganze Aktion verlief dann im Sande. Wieviel schwieriger wird das mit einer Millionenstadt sein.[…]
[…]The city is presumably to be destroyed by artillery, bombs, fire, hunger and cold, without a single German soldier stepping into it.
I personally doubt that this will be possible, given the incredible toughness of the Russian. In my opinion 4 to 5 million people cannot be killed off that easily.
I saw this with my own eyes in Kovno, where the Latvians shot 6 000 Jews, among them women and children. Even a people as rude as the Latvians could no longer bear the sight of this murder in the end. The whole action then ran out of steam. How much more difficult will this be with a city of millions.[…]
Emphasis is mine.
The complete original text and translation of this letter can be found in my post of Mon Sep 02, 2002 6:52 pm on the thread
The Siege of Leningrad in German Documents
http://www.thirdreichforum.com/phpBB2/v ... 1f5e0694cd
Note that the navy liaison officer doesn't seem to have known much about the Baltic countries: he confounded Lithuanians with Latvians.
Also consider how the Kaunas/Kovno pogrom is referred to in Operational Situation Report USSR No. 8 of 30 June 1941 by Einsatzkommando 1 b:
Source of quote:On June 28 Vorkommando (1) has moved into Kaunas. It has started its activity, occupying the former trade union building, the NKVD Building, as well as two other houses. During the night, exchange of heavy fire between Lithuanian insurgents, Jews, and irregulars. Very difficult to secure the prisons, which are totally overcrowded. During the last 3 days Lithuanian partisan groups have already killed several thousand Jews.
http://www.pgonline.com/electriczen/osr08.html
Looks like the “version put out by the Soviet government” was the one closer to the facts.