Interesting topic!
Edward L. Hsiao
Why "Minensuchboot 1935" called a Channel Destroye
-
- Member
- Posts: 2053
- Joined: 01 Aug 2003 08:43
- Location: Flagstaff,Arizona
-
- Financial supporter
- Posts: 2175
- Joined: 03 Dec 2004 20:49
- Location: Stockholm
Re: Why "Minensuchboot 1935" called a Channel Destroye
I believe it was the British that actually started calling it "channel destroyer" - ref- Captain Basil Jones' "And so to Battle". He is also known to have said that he "would rather go into battle with two M35s than one "normal" destroyer".
Of the 69 vessels built 35 were lost during the war. If I remember correctly only four (or six) were lost in naval combat, the first sunk in the summer of '42, but that by Beaufighter fighter-bombers.
"M1" had an especially adventureous career during the Norwegian campaign. Her CO published a book on it in 1941 but it is also well documented in the official Norwegian history.
Fred
------
Of the 69 vessels built 35 were lost during the war. If I remember correctly only four (or six) were lost in naval combat, the first sunk in the summer of '42, but that by Beaufighter fighter-bombers.
"M1" had an especially adventureous career during the Norwegian campaign. Her CO published a book on it in 1941 but it is also well documented in the official Norwegian history.
Fred
------
River Wide, Ocean Deep - a book about Operation Sealion:
https://www.fredleander.com
Saving MacArthur - an eight-book series on the Pacific War:
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07D3 ... rw_dp_labf
https://www.fredleander.com
Saving MacArthur - an eight-book series on the Pacific War:
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07D3 ... rw_dp_labf
-
- Member
- Posts: 5129
- Joined: 10 Jan 2004 16:59
- Location: Denmark
Re: Why "Minensuchboot 1935" called a Channel Destroye
Hello
In february 1940 he rammed and sunk 4 danish fishing wessels and 16 danish sailors lost their life. It has since qualified as a Warcrime. He died in 1945 and his grave is in the graveyard in Rendsborg, Germany.
See also this link: viewtopic.php?f=5&t=89569&hilit=Hans+Bartels
Regards
Kurt
kstdk
Yes, Korvettenkapitän Hans Bartels won the Ritterkreux in may 1940 for his "glorious" actions in Danish and Norwegian waters.fredleander wrote: ↑09 Aug 2021 12:12"M1" had an especially adventureous career during the Norwegian campaign. Her CO published a book on it in 1941 but it is also well documented in the official Norwegian history.Fred------
In february 1940 he rammed and sunk 4 danish fishing wessels and 16 danish sailors lost their life. It has since qualified as a Warcrime. He died in 1945 and his grave is in the graveyard in Rendsborg, Germany.
See also this link: viewtopic.php?f=5&t=89569&hilit=Hans+Bartels
Regards
Kurt
kstdk
-
- Financial supporter
- Posts: 2175
- Joined: 03 Dec 2004 20:49
- Location: Stockholm
Re: Why "Minensuchboot 1935" called a Channel Destroye
kstdk wrote: ↑09 Aug 2021 12:37Hello
Yes, Korvettenkapitän Hans Bartels won the Ritterkreux in may 1940 for his "glorious" actions in Danish and Norwegian waters.
In february 1940 he rammed and sunk 4 danish fishing wessels and 16 danish sailors lost their life. It has since qualified as a Warcrime. He died in 1945 and his grave is in the graveyard in Rendsborg, Germany.
See also this link: viewtopic.php?f=5&t=89569&hilit=Hans+Bartels
Regards
Kurt
kstdk
You have anything to contribute with on the term "channel destroyer"...?
Fred
------
River Wide, Ocean Deep - a book about Operation Sealion:
https://www.fredleander.com
Saving MacArthur - an eight-book series on the Pacific War:
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07D3 ... rw_dp_labf
https://www.fredleander.com
Saving MacArthur - an eight-book series on the Pacific War:
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07D3 ... rw_dp_labf
-
- Member
- Posts: 5129
- Joined: 10 Jan 2004 16:59
- Location: Denmark
Re: Why "Minensuchboot 1935" called a Channel Destroye
Hello Fred
I have come across the term earlier, but not any explanation or conclusions - my comment was only a responce to your comment about M1
Regards
Kurt
kstdk
I have come across the term earlier, but not any explanation or conclusions - my comment was only a responce to your comment about M1

Regards
Kurt
kstdk