77 years ago,China 1937

Discussions on all aspects of the Japanese Empire, from the capture of Taiwan until the end of the Second World War.
User avatar
Peter H
Member
Posts: 28628
Joined: 30 Dec 2002 13:18
Location: Australia

Post by Peter H » 08 Feb 2007 11:15

Jung Chang on Shanghai:
..73 of China's 180 divisions--and the best one-third--over 400,000 men,were thrown in,and all but wiped out.The conflict here consumed virtually all of China's nascent air force(which Chiang so treasured that he had not sent a single plane to the northern front),and the main warships.It significantly weakened the military force Chiang had been painstakingly building up since the early 1930s...
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

User avatar
Peter H
Member
Posts: 28628
Joined: 30 Dec 2002 13:18
Location: Australia

Post by Peter H » 08 Feb 2007 11:23

Herbert Bix on Shanghai:
..Chiang decided to abandon the north and by shifting the war to the lower Yangtze River region,starting at Shanghai,possibly involve the foreign powers in defense of their citizens living in China's largest and most international city...
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

User avatar
Peter H
Member
Posts: 28628
Joined: 30 Dec 2002 13:18
Location: Australia

Post by Peter H » 08 Feb 2007 12:46

The army reinforces
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

User avatar
Peter H
Member
Posts: 28628
Joined: 30 Dec 2002 13:18
Location: Australia

Post by Peter H » 08 Feb 2007 12:51

Coming ashore
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

User avatar
Peter H
Member
Posts: 28628
Joined: 30 Dec 2002 13:18
Location: Australia

Post by Peter H » 08 Feb 2007 12:56

Bugler
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

User avatar
Peter H
Member
Posts: 28628
Joined: 30 Dec 2002 13:18
Location: Australia

Post by Peter H » 08 Feb 2007 13:02

Still flying
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

User avatar
Peter H
Member
Posts: 28628
Joined: 30 Dec 2002 13:18
Location: Australia

Post by Peter H » 09 Feb 2007 04:15

Mortar in action
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

User avatar
Peter H
Member
Posts: 28628
Joined: 30 Dec 2002 13:18
Location: Australia

Post by Peter H » 09 Feb 2007 04:21

Drink
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

User avatar
Peter H
Member
Posts: 28628
Joined: 30 Dec 2002 13:18
Location: Australia

Post by Peter H » 09 Feb 2007 13:50

Tanks outside Shanghai
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

User avatar
Peter H
Member
Posts: 28628
Joined: 30 Dec 2002 13:18
Location: Australia

Post by Peter H » 09 Feb 2007 13:55

Cleaning tracks
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

User avatar
Peter H
Member
Posts: 28628
Joined: 30 Dec 2002 13:18
Location: Australia

Post by Peter H » 09 Feb 2007 14:01

Infantry
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

User avatar
Peter H
Member
Posts: 28628
Joined: 30 Dec 2002 13:18
Location: Australia

Post by Peter H » 09 Feb 2007 14:06

Back in the city--armoured car
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

pitman
Member
Posts: 277
Joined: 08 Jan 2006 21:54
Location: Columbus, OH

Post by pitman » 09 Feb 2007 16:12

That's not a mortar identified above. It looks like an infantry gun, probably 37mm.

Ardee
Member
Posts: 276
Joined: 17 Sep 2006 04:58
Location: Idaho, USA

Post by Ardee » 09 Feb 2007 17:57

Thank you for the earlier close-up of the Nambu on a tripod!

Regarding pitman's comment, I believe the weapon is a Type 92 70mm infantry gun, also called a Battalion gun.It is said to have been the most common Japanese artillery piece of the war. According to a site concerned with the Aussie 42nd Battalions (http://au.geocities.com/thefortysecondi ... upport.htm), the Type 92 was issued at the usual rate of two per Infantry Battalion, though this could be doubled for specific units... It benefited from a relatively long range, though it was also deployed at much closer ranges. By firing at a higher elevation, it was possible to engage targets just 100 metres distant. This also meant the shells impacted at a much steeper angle, more akin to a mortar than a gun. Another view of the gun in action may be seen here:
http://www.galleries.hkvca.ca/photogall ... fantry.JPG

P.S. -- I also recall reading the Japanese also had an AP round for this gun...

User avatar
Peter H
Member
Posts: 28628
Joined: 30 Dec 2002 13:18
Location: Australia

Post by Peter H » 10 Feb 2007 00:51

Thanks guys.

Officer reviews
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Return to “Japan at War 1895-1945”