77 years ago,China 1937

Discussions on all aspects of the Japanese Empire, from the capture of Taiwan until the end of the Second World War.
Post Reply
User avatar
Peter H
Member
Posts: 28628
Joined: 30 Dec 2002, 14:18
Location: Australia

#31

Post by Peter H » 08 Feb 2007, 12:15

Jung Chang on Shanghai:
..73 of China's 180 divisions--and the best one-third--over 400,000 men,were thrown in,and all but wiped out.The conflict here consumed virtually all of China's nascent air force(which Chiang so treasured that he had not sent a single plane to the northern front),and the main warships.It significantly weakened the military force Chiang had been painstakingly building up since the early 1930s...
Attachments
cj24.jpg
cj24.jpg (114.62 KiB) Viewed 4094 times

User avatar
Peter H
Member
Posts: 28628
Joined: 30 Dec 2002, 14:18
Location: Australia

#32

Post by Peter H » 08 Feb 2007, 12:23

Herbert Bix on Shanghai:
..Chiang decided to abandon the north and by shifting the war to the lower Yangtze River region,starting at Shanghai,possibly involve the foreign powers in defense of their citizens living in China's largest and most international city...
Attachments
cj25.jpg
cj25.jpg (103.96 KiB) Viewed 4097 times


User avatar
Peter H
Member
Posts: 28628
Joined: 30 Dec 2002, 14:18
Location: Australia

#33

Post by Peter H » 08 Feb 2007, 13:46

The army reinforces
Attachments
cj26.jpg
cj26.jpg (119.13 KiB) Viewed 4085 times

User avatar
Peter H
Member
Posts: 28628
Joined: 30 Dec 2002, 14:18
Location: Australia

#34

Post by Peter H » 08 Feb 2007, 13:51

Coming ashore
Attachments
cj27.jpg
cj27.jpg (109.59 KiB) Viewed 4080 times

User avatar
Peter H
Member
Posts: 28628
Joined: 30 Dec 2002, 14:18
Location: Australia

#35

Post by Peter H » 08 Feb 2007, 13:56

Bugler
Attachments
cj28.jpg
cj28.jpg (109.9 KiB) Viewed 4081 times

User avatar
Peter H
Member
Posts: 28628
Joined: 30 Dec 2002, 14:18
Location: Australia

#36

Post by Peter H » 08 Feb 2007, 14:02

Still flying
Attachments
cj29.jpg
cj29.jpg (66.53 KiB) Viewed 4070 times

User avatar
Peter H
Member
Posts: 28628
Joined: 30 Dec 2002, 14:18
Location: Australia

#37

Post by Peter H » 09 Feb 2007, 05:15

Mortar in action
Attachments
cj30.jpg
cj30.jpg (133.21 KiB) Viewed 4052 times

User avatar
Peter H
Member
Posts: 28628
Joined: 30 Dec 2002, 14:18
Location: Australia

#38

Post by Peter H » 09 Feb 2007, 05:21

Drink
Attachments
cj31.jpg
cj31.jpg (98.12 KiB) Viewed 4047 times

User avatar
Peter H
Member
Posts: 28628
Joined: 30 Dec 2002, 14:18
Location: Australia

#39

Post by Peter H » 09 Feb 2007, 14:50

Tanks outside Shanghai
Attachments
cj32.jpg
cj32.jpg (114.48 KiB) Viewed 4034 times

User avatar
Peter H
Member
Posts: 28628
Joined: 30 Dec 2002, 14:18
Location: Australia

#40

Post by Peter H » 09 Feb 2007, 14:55

Cleaning tracks
Attachments
cj33.jpg
cj33.jpg (112.47 KiB) Viewed 4218 times

User avatar
Peter H
Member
Posts: 28628
Joined: 30 Dec 2002, 14:18
Location: Australia

#41

Post by Peter H » 09 Feb 2007, 15:01

Infantry
Attachments
cj34.jpg
cj34.jpg (96.76 KiB) Viewed 4212 times

User avatar
Peter H
Member
Posts: 28628
Joined: 30 Dec 2002, 14:18
Location: Australia

#42

Post by Peter H » 09 Feb 2007, 15:06

Back in the city--armoured car
Attachments
cj35.jpg
cj35.jpg (101.09 KiB) Viewed 4328 times

pitman
Member
Posts: 277
Joined: 08 Jan 2006, 22:54
Location: Columbus, OH
Contact:

#43

Post by pitman » 09 Feb 2007, 17:12

That's not a mortar identified above. It looks like an infantry gun, probably 37mm.

Ardee
Member
Posts: 306
Joined: 17 Sep 2006, 05:58
Location: Idaho, USA

#44

Post by Ardee » 09 Feb 2007, 18:57

Thank you for the earlier close-up of the Nambu on a tripod!

Regarding pitman's comment, I believe the weapon is a Type 92 70mm infantry gun, also called a Battalion gun.It is said to have been the most common Japanese artillery piece of the war. According to a site concerned with the Aussie 42nd Battalions (http://au.geocities.com/thefortysecondi ... upport.htm), the Type 92 was issued at the usual rate of two per Infantry Battalion, though this could be doubled for specific units... It benefited from a relatively long range, though it was also deployed at much closer ranges. By firing at a higher elevation, it was possible to engage targets just 100 metres distant. This also meant the shells impacted at a much steeper angle, more akin to a mortar than a gun. Another view of the gun in action may be seen here:
http://www.galleries.hkvca.ca/photogall ... fantry.JPG

P.S. -- I also recall reading the Japanese also had an AP round for this gun...

User avatar
Peter H
Member
Posts: 28628
Joined: 30 Dec 2002, 14:18
Location: Australia

#45

Post by Peter H » 10 Feb 2007, 01:51

Thanks guys.

Officer reviews
Attachments
cj36.jpg
cj36.jpg (107.35 KiB) Viewed 4155 times

Post Reply

Return to “Japan at War 1895-1945”