Confirmation of sword type

Discussions on all aspects of the Japanese Empire, from the capture of Taiwan until the end of the Second World War.
Post Reply
Hachiman44
Member
Posts: 5
Joined: 27 Jan 2019, 01:49
Location: Australia

Confirmation of sword type

#1

Post by Hachiman44 » 24 Nov 2019, 08:14

Hello,

My grandfather fought for Australia against the Japanese in New Guinea and Bougainville. Apart from a few small items such as a bugle and occupation money, I was not aware he brought back any artifacts. My grandfather passed several years back, but today I visited his brother who gave me a bunch of wartime items. He doesn't really remember how he got hold of them, but assumes they came from his brother.

You can see a rising sun flag, kamikaze bandana and an Imperial Navy cap. But I am most curious about the short sword and would like to confirm whether it was indeed from the Imperial Japanese Army and, if possible, try and work out its origin. I've done some Google searching and I cannot find an IJA short sword with a hilt like that. There are no markings or writing on it. The sheath is very flimsy and looks like a piece of thin bamboo wrapped around some other kind of wood. It would be great if someone could identify it and shed a little more light on it. I realise it might be difficult.

Thanks.
Attachments
20191124_153640.jpg
20191124_153632.jpg

User avatar
fontessa
Member
Posts: 4509
Joined: 25 Mar 2011, 17:29
Location: Yokohama, Japan

Re: Confirmation of sword type

#2

Post by fontessa » 24 Nov 2019, 10:09

Hell Hachiman44,

It seems that the dagger is not for the IJN officer.
http://ohmura-study.net/971.html

fontessa


User avatar
von thoma
Member
Posts: 6526
Joined: 10 Jul 2010, 04:40
Location: Spain

Re: Confirmation of sword type

#3

Post by von thoma » 24 Nov 2019, 10:32

A posibility; It could be an American old short sword related with Civil War ( Confederate )
" The right to believe is the right of those who don't know "

Hachiman44
Member
Posts: 5
Joined: 27 Jan 2019, 01:49
Location: Australia

Re: Confirmation of sword type

#4

Post by Hachiman44 » 24 Nov 2019, 12:16

fontessa wrote:
24 Nov 2019, 10:09
Hell Hachiman44,

It seems that the dagger is not for the IJN officer.
http://ohmura-study.net/971.html

fontessa
IJA perhaps?

User avatar
fontessa
Member
Posts: 4509
Joined: 25 Mar 2011, 17:29
Location: Yokohama, Japan

Re: Confirmation of sword type

#5

Post by fontessa » 24 Nov 2019, 17:55

Hachiman44 wrote:
24 Nov 2019, 12:16
fontessa wrote:
24 Nov 2019, 10:09
Hell Hachiman44,

It seems that the dagger is not for the IJN officer.
http://ohmura-study.net/971.html

fontessa
IJA perhaps?
No, IJN officer was equipped with the dagger shown in the web I posted. IJA officer was not equipped with dagger.

fontessa

User avatar
R Leonard
Member
Posts: 474
Joined: 16 Oct 2003, 03:48
Location: The Old Dominion

Re: Confirmation of sword type

#6

Post by R Leonard » 24 Nov 2019, 19:26

My theory would be that this might be similar to one of those almost mythical US cavalry sabres cut down for use as a machete. See third paragraph down under World War II; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/112th_Cavalry_Regiment.

Hachiman44
Member
Posts: 5
Joined: 27 Jan 2019, 01:49
Location: Australia

Re: Confirmation of sword type

#7

Post by Hachiman44 » 25 Nov 2019, 22:42

After all that, turns out it's an Indonesian sword. Now to figure out how it came to be in my family...

ROLAND1369
Member
Posts: 1404
Joined: 26 May 2007, 16:22
Location: USA

Re: Confirmation of sword type

#8

Post by ROLAND1369 » 26 Nov 2019, 02:24

As little as can be determined by the photo the knife most closely resembles the earlier M 1906 US cavalry saber. It can be confirmed or denied by checking the blade at the point where it joins the handle. There should be US Army ordnance markings and a US marking. Aside from the 112 cav story, The OSS in Burma had a number of Cavalry sabers of unknown model cut down as machetes. Note the resemblance of the Hilt of the 1906 of the saber to the knife in question as well as the slight curve of the remaining portion of the blade. Photos are from Ebay.
Attachments
M 1906 CAV SABER1TRANS.JPG
M 1906 CAV SABER1TRANS.JPG (34.85 KiB) Viewed 2674 times
M 1906 CAV SABER2trans.jpg
M 1906 CAV SABER2trans.jpg (37.14 KiB) Viewed 2674 times
M 1906 CAV SABER5TRANS.JPG
M 1906 CAV SABER5TRANS.JPG (71.4 KiB) Viewed 2674 times
M 1906 CAV SABER6TRANS.JPG
M 1906 CAV SABER6TRANS.JPG (62.48 KiB) Viewed 2674 times

ROLAND1369
Member
Posts: 1404
Joined: 26 May 2007, 16:22
Location: USA

Re: Confirmation of sword type

#9

Post by ROLAND1369 » 26 Nov 2019, 16:10

Having said this, there are significant differences enough to doubt that this is the source of the knife. It has no resemblance to the last production US saber, the model 1913. The latter would have been the saber issued during WW II.

Hachiman44
Member
Posts: 5
Joined: 27 Jan 2019, 01:49
Location: Australia

Re: Confirmation of sword type

#10

Post by Hachiman44 » 28 Nov 2019, 11:40

I consulted a sword specialist who suggested that perhaps the blade and hilt were originally separate - the blade being Indonesian style, the hilt being cavalry style. The hilts of cavalry swords across the world during the 18th and 19th centuries all had that style. The mystery now is how is came to be in my family. Perhaps an IJA soldier got it from an Indonesian person, and my grandfather (or someone else) got it and brought it back to Australia.

Post Reply

Return to “Japan at War 1895-1945”