Working fine ?
Between 38/39 and 43/ 44 the production of hard coal (without the protectorate ) was increasing by 81 million ton, but this increase was due to the increase of the Silesia production (74 million) and the Saar (8 million) ,while there was a stagnation in the Ruhr.And why was there an increase in Silesia(from 27 to 101)? Because of the annexation of the Polish coal areas . Without this annexation, the coal production would stagnate .
Thus : working fine ?
NO
The American WW2 Economic Puzzle
- Guaporense
- Banned
- Posts: 1866
- Joined: 07 Oct 2009, 03:35
- Location: USA
Re: The American WW2 Economic Puzzle
Yes, continental European coal production as a whole increased about 10% from 1937 to 1943. It didn't increase like the US's (which increased over 40% from 1937 to 1943), but increased nonetheless.
"In tactics, as in strategy, superiority in numbers is the most common element of victory." - Carl von Clausewitz
- Guaporense
- Banned
- Posts: 1866
- Joined: 07 Oct 2009, 03:35
- Location: USA
Re: The American WW2 Economic Puzzle
Using the same kind of analysis for the US:
Real NNP (source: Friedman, Monetary Trends of the United States and the United Kingdom), millions 1929 dollars:
1937 - 92,717
1938 - 85,391
1939 - 92,268
1940 - 101,176
1941 - 113,338
1942 - 130,978
1943 - 141,021
1944 - 142,919
1945 - 138,055
Coal output:
1939 - 404.9
1940 - 464.7
1941 - 515.0
1942 - 580.9
1943 - 586.2
Coal output increased by 45% while NNP increased by 52% from 1939 to 1943. They match more closely than the German figures (increase in coal output of 45% while GNP increased 77%), although the US didn't experience a increase in energy intensity like Germany did in WW1 (when coal output dropped 5% but GNP dropped 21%). Assuming the US energy intensity increased to be same degree as in Germany in WW1 would imply in an increase in energy intensity from 1939 to 1943 of 20%, so real NNP of the US would be 111,666 million 1929 dollars in 1943.
Real NNP (source: Friedman, Monetary Trends of the United States and the United Kingdom), millions 1929 dollars:
1937 - 92,717
1938 - 85,391
1939 - 92,268
1940 - 101,176
1941 - 113,338
1942 - 130,978
1943 - 141,021
1944 - 142,919
1945 - 138,055
Coal output:
1939 - 404.9
1940 - 464.7
1941 - 515.0
1942 - 580.9
1943 - 586.2
Coal output increased by 45% while NNP increased by 52% from 1939 to 1943. They match more closely than the German figures (increase in coal output of 45% while GNP increased 77%), although the US didn't experience a increase in energy intensity like Germany did in WW1 (when coal output dropped 5% but GNP dropped 21%). Assuming the US energy intensity increased to be same degree as in Germany in WW1 would imply in an increase in energy intensity from 1939 to 1943 of 20%, so real NNP of the US would be 111,666 million 1929 dollars in 1943.
"In tactics, as in strategy, superiority in numbers is the most common element of victory." - Carl von Clausewitz
Re: The American WW2 Economic Puzzle
German coal production did not increase by 45 % in WWII .Guaporense wrote:Using the same kind of analysis for the US:
Real NNP (source: Friedman, Monetary Trends of the United States and the United Kingdom), millions 1929 dollars:
1937 - 92,717
1938 - 85,391
1939 - 92,268
1940 - 101,176
1941 - 113,338
1942 - 130,978
1943 - 141,021
1944 - 142,919
1945 - 138,055
Coal output:
1939 - 404.9
1940 - 464.7
1941 - 515.0
1942 - 580.9
1943 - 586.2
Coal output increased by 45% while NNP increased by 52% from 1939 to 1943. They match more closely than the German figures (increase in coal output of 45% while GNP increased 77%), although the US didn't experience a increase in energy intensity like Germany did in WW1 (when coal output dropped 5% but GNP dropped 21%). Assuming the US energy intensity increased to be same degree as in Germany in WW1 would imply in an increase in energy intensity from 1939 to 1943 of 20%, so real NNP of the US would be 111,666 million 1929 dollars in 1943.
- Guaporense
- Banned
- Posts: 1866
- Joined: 07 Oct 2009, 03:35
- Location: USA
Re: The American WW2 Economic Puzzle
Counting the annexed territories it did (as German GNP figures I posted to include all annexed territories).
"In tactics, as in strategy, superiority in numbers is the most common element of victory." - Carl von Clausewitz