Petrol and rubber

Discussions on the economic history of the nations taking part in WW2, from the recovery after the depression until the economy at war.
oscar
Member
Posts: 88
Joined: 07 Aug 2002, 23:37
Location: Sweden

Petrol and rubber

#1

Post by oscar » 30 Aug 2003, 11:51

Would the Reich manage to have full suply of rubber and petrol of efficiently many syntetic plants were build? Would it be possible to build many enough, and why was it not done if there was such problems with to little petrol and rubber ? if they would be build undergruond they wouldnt be possible to bomb out...

User avatar
Penn44
Banned
Posts: 4214
Joined: 26 Jun 2003, 07:25
Location: US

#2

Post by Penn44 » 30 Aug 2003, 18:16

Even if the Germans built the necessary underground synthetic fuel plants, the Germans would still face the difficulty of getting the coal or shale to the plants, and then getting the produced synthetic fuel and lubricants to the units in the field. Allied interdiction of German rail lines was a major problem.


.


User avatar
Redbaron1908
Member
Posts: 2023
Joined: 31 Dec 2002, 18:52
Location: Texas

#3

Post by Redbaron1908 » 30 Aug 2003, 18:48

I agree towards the end of the war the German transportation system broke down completly even if they managed to make it they might now be able to get it to their field units.

oscar
Member
Posts: 88
Joined: 07 Aug 2002, 23:37
Location: Sweden

Yes but...

#4

Post by oscar » 30 Aug 2003, 22:33

Remember that much of the damage to the railway could be prevented maybee completly if there was petrol from the beginning.

User avatar
Eightball
Member
Posts: 669
Joined: 13 Sep 2002, 23:37
Location: Oslo, Norway

#5

Post by Eightball » 30 Aug 2003, 23:59

That may be, Oscar. Though the destruction of Germany's infrastructure was mostly, if not fully, the Allied airforce's doing. Who could stop the many bombers coming over Germany? The Luftwaffe, which we know all to well had a poor leadership which eventually would lead to its complete destruction as an efficient airforce *cough*Göring*cough*.

User avatar
Redbaron1908
Member
Posts: 2023
Joined: 31 Dec 2002, 18:52
Location: Texas

Re: Yes but...

#6

Post by Redbaron1908 » 31 Aug 2003, 02:28

oscar wrote:Remember that much of the damage to the railway could be prevented maybee completly if there was petrol from the beginning.
I think it depends on the luftwaffe and how they could defend the reich but if they did not do a better job it is useless to have fuel. You also need good pilots.

User avatar
hauptmannn
Member
Posts: 1103
Joined: 12 Jul 2003, 15:15
Location: France

#7

Post by hauptmannn » 31 Aug 2003, 14:25

Fuel and Leadership problems plagued the Luftwaffe, remember that during the last 1-2 years there was only a handful of aircraft that could actually leave the ground while many hundreds remained on the ground. A handful of brave fighter pilots cannot stop hundreds of bombers and escort fighters. Btw when did Germany start losing air superiority?

User avatar
ChrisMAg2
Member
Posts: 641
Joined: 04 Aug 2003, 09:26
Location: Hannover, Germany or Manila, Philippines

#8

Post by ChrisMAg2 » 01 Sep 2003, 14:09

hauptmannn wrote: Btw when did Germany start losing air superiority?
If that can be fixed to a specific date: after mid 1943 latest. That was the time when the long-range fighter appeared and the fighter protection was assigned to the bombers, IMO.
Regards

oscar
Member
Posts: 88
Joined: 07 Aug 2002, 23:37
Location: Sweden

So...

#9

Post by oscar » 01 Sep 2003, 22:34

If there are planes standing on the ground without fuel how could you not build more synthetic fuel plant?

User avatar
Penn44
Banned
Posts: 4214
Joined: 26 Jun 2003, 07:25
Location: US

Re: So...

#10

Post by Penn44 » 02 Sep 2003, 01:58

oscar wrote:If there are planes standing on the ground without fuel how could you not build more synthetic fuel plant?
Where are you going to get the skilled and unskilled labor to dig these synthetic fuel plants? Projects were under way but underground factories do not appear overnight.

.

ChristopherPerrien
Member
Posts: 7051
Joined: 26 Dec 2002, 01:58
Location: Mississippi

#11

Post by ChristopherPerrien » 02 Sep 2003, 05:23

Synthetic fuel plants, combine coal processing facilites, a chemical plant and an oil refinery. I can only imagine the amounts of work, labor, materials and costs to put even one of these complexes fully underground.


Given the machinery and processes involved I don't think you could, or would want to. One fire, bomb, accident, etc. and BOOM!

User avatar
Qvist
Member
Posts: 7836
Joined: 11 Mar 2002, 17:59
Location: Europe

#12

Post by Qvist » 02 Sep 2003, 09:18

Theoretically, you can of course produce any amount of fuel and rubber as long as you have enough coal. The reason why Germany did not should be perfectly obvious - there was only so much construction capacity, machine tools, labor and time.


cheers

User avatar
Penn44
Banned
Posts: 4214
Joined: 26 Jun 2003, 07:25
Location: US

#13

Post by Penn44 » 02 Sep 2003, 10:29

Not to mention starting late (spring 1944) the program of emplacing the synthetic fuel plants underground.

User avatar
jmlima
Member
Posts: 31
Joined: 25 Aug 2003, 09:37
Location: V N Gaia - Portugal

#14

Post by jmlima » 02 Sep 2003, 11:32

And weren't there very strong problems with the syntethic fuel?

Mark V
Member
Posts: 3925
Joined: 22 May 2002, 10:41
Location: Suomi Finland

#15

Post by Mark V » 02 Sep 2003, 20:22

jmlima wrote:And weren't there very strong problems with the syntethic fuel?
You mean synthetic fuels suitability to engines ??

Synthetic fuel was/is as good as normal motor gasoline, avgas, or diesel. Mostly the differences came from availability of additives, in avgas especially tetraethylene lead. Was the base gasoline made through hydrogenation of coal, or is it a fraction of crude oil makes no difference (though they are different in their chemical composition).

There was though an product range that could not be produced without crude oil with WW2 era technology - lubricants.

Mark V

Post Reply

Return to “Economy”