Flak emplacement at Merville battery

Discussions on the fortifications, artillery, & rockets used by the Axis forces.
User avatar
kstdk
Member
Posts: 5446
Joined: 10 Jan 2004, 17:59
Location: Denmark
Contact:

#16

Post by kstdk » 31 May 2006, 11:26

Hello Jos

Interesting - then nr. 3 and nr. 4 must be R612 / nr. 2 R669 / nr. 1 R 611 ???

Referring to my "famous map" above !

There seems to be a difference in size on the map too - hmmmm ?

Regards
Kurt
kstdk

jopaerya
Member
Posts: 19238
Joined: 21 Jun 2004, 14:21
Location: middelburg

#17

Post by jopaerya » 31 May 2006, 11:33

Hello Kurt

Thanks , do you or others have a good
drawing of the bunker 7 on the allready
famous map .

Regards Jos


Metzler
Member
Posts: 30
Joined: 27 May 2006, 11:44
Location: Uppsala, Sweden

#18

Post by Metzler » 31 May 2006, 12:51

Hello Jos and Kurt,


Interesting about the R612's, do you konw if anybody have measured them? That should tell the difference from the R669. Before I went to Normady in 2004 I asked H. Lippmann at DAWA about the bunkers at Merville and he said that bunker No 7 was a R622 serving as group shelter. After my visit however I think it looks much more like a R501, with a very large emerency exit. Do you have any other information? Bunker No 6 is a R502 which served as command bunker.

Regards,

Metzler

User avatar
bunker14
Member
Posts: 316
Joined: 03 Dec 2005, 19:36
Location: France "Normandie"
Contact:

#19

Post by bunker14 » 31 May 2006, 13:40

Metzler wrote:Did the veteran say that this was a kitchen or was it just a good guess? And it does not explain the triangular concrete construction left by the "statue".

Ben

Metzler
hi
yes he said that was the kitchen. for the triangular concrete construction left by the "statue" he said that was the fisrt flak emplacement but destroyed .

Image

Metzler
Member
Posts: 30
Joined: 27 May 2006, 11:44
Location: Uppsala, Sweden

#20

Post by Metzler » 31 May 2006, 14:52

Hello,...

Intresting information you came up with Ben. The British inteligence report made 8 May, 1944 mentions three light AA positions. Could both the kitchen roof and the triangular construction have been used at the same time, or did they move the Flak gun to the kitchen after the triangular emplacement was destroyed (maybe in the air raid 20th or 29th April)? During the first raid over the battery the battery only had one "Erika" 20mm Flak" to shoot back with (Bernage, G., Red Devils in Normandy, Heimdal)

Kurt, in yor pictures from bunker No 3, there seems to be a ladder going down in the floor opening. Is this a R612 modified with a Hülsenraum, emegrency exit, or is it just for drainage? Does anybody know?

Regards,

Metzler

jopaerya
Member
Posts: 19238
Joined: 21 Jun 2004, 14:21
Location: middelburg

Re: Flak emplacement at Merville battery

#21

Post by jopaerya » 25 Jun 2018, 10:06

According to the Ebay seller this should be the Merville battery , Regards Jos
Attachments
s-l1600 (2).jpg

pvv8
Member
Posts: 93
Joined: 07 Dec 2022, 13:46
Location: Moorsel, België

Re: Flak emplacement at Merville battery

#22

Post by pvv8 » 22 Apr 2023, 12:55

Hi
Just back from Normandy, my first visit was HKB Merville, was there also in 2017 and I noticed, that they "updated" it ( new layout / buildings )
Made a drone flight above the area ( see below picture ). Based on several websites, there were 2 x R612, 1 x R611 and 1 x R669.
However, when I had a look at the website of Batterie de Merville, https://www.batterie-merville.com/en/th ... e-battery/
they mentioned :
quote
The first concrete pillbox to be cast was number 1, also known as a type H611, the largest of the four pillboxes. This was followed by pillboxes 2, 3 and 4, all type H669.
unquote

My question, is the above, from the website of Batterie de Merville correct ?
Attachments
Turqueville 03.Movie_Snapshot.jpg

User avatar
AvB
Financial supporter
Posts: 3428
Joined: 20 Jun 2004, 01:00
Location: Utrecht, Netherlands
Contact:

Re: Flak emplacement at Merville battery

#23

Post by AvB » 23 Apr 2023, 21:08

No it's not. If you check aerial photos you can see the difference between the casemates. A 612 is smaller than a 669.

pvv8
Member
Posts: 93
Joined: 07 Dec 2022, 13:46
Location: Moorsel, België

Re: Flak emplacement at Merville battery

#24

Post by pvv8 » 24 Apr 2023, 10:58

OK, thanks for the confirmation !

User avatar
moonraker
Member
Posts: 2642
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 23:06
Location: normandie.french

Re: Flak emplacement at Merville battery

#25

Post by moonraker » 28 Apr 2023, 10:42

hello pvv8,
the fonction bunker for the german is very important. I never see the document with the regelbau followed of SK. even with a construction variant the type remains the same.


Me belfra-team

pvv8
Member
Posts: 93
Joined: 07 Dec 2022, 13:46
Location: Moorsel, België

Re: Flak emplacement at Merville battery

#26

Post by pvv8 » 28 Apr 2023, 10:55

Hi Moonraker,

Could you clarify what you mean exactly ?

The R669 and R612 have 2 flanking walls...is it that ?

Thanks in advance
Patrick

User avatar
moonraker
Member
Posts: 2642
Joined: 24 Nov 2005, 23:06
Location: normandie.french

Re: Flak emplacement at Merville battery

#27

Post by moonraker » 28 Apr 2023, 13:43

hi
Not that the bunker type is a protective wall, a modify room or an extension modification the type does not take vf7b + SK,or others.

Me belfra-team

pvv8
Member
Posts: 93
Joined: 07 Dec 2022, 13:46
Location: Moorsel, België

Re: Flak emplacement at Merville battery

#28

Post by pvv8 » 28 Apr 2023, 14:05

Ah OK, I took the name from a reliable website and due to the fact that both of them had significant modification, I thought it was correct.
Thanks, it's good to know !

Post Reply

Return to “Fortifications, Artillery, & Rockets”