Artillery Fire Control Equipment
Re: Artillery Fire Control Equipment
Looks to me like a same device , photo from Ebay .
Regards Jos
Regards Jos
- Attachments
-
- DSC_0834.jpg (87.14 KiB) Viewed 1737 times
Re: Artillery Fire Control Equipment
Device to calculate direction and distance for infantry weapons. Works out to range 4600 meters and operates with direction in mils (/6400). Very useful for calculating defensive lines of fire on maps, as well as calculate individual own weapons locations for maps.
I have one with production code caj.
JEF
I have one with production code caj.
JEF
-
- Host - Allied sections
- Posts: 10063
- Joined: 02 Sep 2006, 21:31
- Location: USA
Re: Artillery Fire Control Equipment
This seems to have two direction indicators linked. Or does the photo show two devices. How exactly is it used?jopaerya wrote:Looks to me like a same device , photo from Ebay .
Regards Jos
Re: Artillery Fire Control Equipment
Everything on the photo is linked together, with two base plates allowing for direction and tree base lineals.
It is a triangle calculator that incorporates the Pythagorean theorem and the Sine Rule.
Max base lenght is 3560 meters-
JEF
It is a triangle calculator that incorporates the Pythagorean theorem and the Sine Rule.
Max base lenght is 3560 meters-
JEF
Re: Artillery Fire Control Equipment
Thank you very much JEF
-
- Host - Allied sections
- Posts: 10063
- Joined: 02 Sep 2006, 21:31
- Location: USA
Re: Artillery Fire Control Equipment
So, the base plates (circular part?) represent weapon position, observation position, target, or other known point? Is the device to be used on a map or chart table, or independently?
Thanks
Thanks
Re: Artillery Fire Control Equipment
Hi Natter!Natter wrote:Peter A wrote:Does anyone have pictures of a Lang Basis Gerät M42H or a Lang Basis Kleingerät C/36?There are no photos in that particular thread, but you'll find photos in other topics of the forum (check those covering MKB Trondenes and the firecontrol-exibition at Oscarsborg). I have several photos myself, but I'm not sure if they are useful.Carl Schwamberger wrote:Here is all my search turned up. Perhaps this: http://www.kystfort.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=930
forum will lead to something.
It's the same links as I posted above.Carl Schwamberger wrote:Note the links to the US Army intel reports in the last post there.
Many of those links are dead though, as I have removed the files, but feel free to ask for a copy if needed.
Is it possible for you to somehow send the US Army Intel reports?
Best regards, Peter
Re: Artillery Fire Control Equipment
IIRC German arty observers had optical rangefinders, hence devices like the one shown. UK used a similar device pre-1914, but quickly concluded simplicity was better, ie fast procedures and rounds on the ground.
Re: Artillery Fire Control Equipment
Marineartillerieschule I in Swinemunde with the Graphischer E.U. Messer and Langbasis-Kleingerät from Ebay .
Regards Jos
Regards Jos
-
- Member
- Posts: 4
- Joined: 06 Jan 2013, 00:15
Re: Artillery Fire Control Equipment
Small update to this old message: This very LBK is on display again in the S414 of the Atlantikwall Museum Noordwijk (https://atlantikwall.nl/)! It has been beautifully restored by Historic Engineering (http://www.historicengineering.com/)
Re: Artillery Fire Control Equipment
Yes, I saw the pictures on FB: https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php? ... &__tn__=-RMaginot255 wrote: ↑24 Sep 2019, 02:24Small update to this old message: This very LBK is on display again in the S414 of the Atlantikwall Museum Noordwijk (https://atlantikwall.nl/)! It has been beautifully restored by Historic Engineering (http://www.historicengineering.com/)
Re: Artillery Fire Control Equipment
Hello,
In the context of M.K.B. :
I miss some information to understand the process. As the "time of flight" depends on the the corrections on azimut and range, and that corrections also depends on the time of flight, I guess one variable have to be manly decided and fixed to work on the others. I guess it is the future flight time ? Correct me if I'm wrong, here is a sketch to clearer understand my questions.
I keep in memory that in the H.K.B. context, suited with poorest set of equipements, they choose a "future distance" that will be reached taking into account the time of flight and the time of gun preparation (loading + aiming).
Best regards
In the context of M.K.B. :
I miss some information to understand the process. As the "time of flight" depends on the the corrections on azimut and range, and that corrections also depends on the time of flight, I guess one variable have to be manly decided and fixed to work on the others. I guess it is the future flight time ? Correct me if I'm wrong, here is a sketch to clearer understand my questions.
I keep in memory that in the H.K.B. context, suited with poorest set of equipements, they choose a "future distance" that will be reached taking into account the time of flight and the time of gun preparation (loading + aiming).
Best regards
-
- Member
- Posts: 4
- Joined: 06 Jan 2013, 00:15
Re: Artillery Fire Control Equipment
I know this is an old message, but I still wanted to respond.
This former Battery Rosenburg equipment is now fully restored and on display in the Atlantikwall Museum in Noordwijk, Netherlands
www.atlantikwall.nl
-
- Host - Allied sections
- Posts: 10063
- Joined: 02 Sep 2006, 21:31
- Location: USA
Re: Artillery Fire Control Equipment
Thanks for that. This thread is to good to remain inactive
- AvB
- Financial supporter
- Posts: 3428
- Joined: 20 Jun 2004, 01:00
- Location: Utrecht, Netherlands
- Contact:
Re: Artillery Fire Control Equipment
What I found interesting is that the American report on heavy coastal batteries mentions that the German equipment was outdated and not of any use to modern American fire control. Was this American chauvinism or was the German equipment indeed outdated, over complicated and not useful anymore?