3.7cm Flak 43
Re: 3.7cm Flak 43
A 3,7 cm Flak 43 captured somewhere in Europe by US troops in 1945. Note the 8.8 cm Flak gun in the background.
Source: University of North Texas Libraries, The Portal to Texas History, http://texashistory.unt.edu; crediting The 12th Armored Division Memorial Museum, Abilene, Texas.
Emmanuel
Source: University of North Texas Libraries, The Portal to Texas History, http://texashistory.unt.edu; crediting The 12th Armored Division Memorial Museum, Abilene, Texas.
Emmanuel
Re: 3.7cm Flak 43
Great picture Sturm78
Re: 3.7cm Flak 43
3,7 cm Flakzwilling 43 on its Sd.Ah. 206 trailer (dual axles). Note the absence of the shield.
Image ID: C46BEH
Copyright: © Sueddeutsche Zeitung Photo / Alamy Stock Photo
http://c7.alamy.com/comp/C46BEH/second- ... C46BEH.jpg
Emmanuel
Image ID: C46BEH
Copyright: © Sueddeutsche Zeitung Photo / Alamy Stock Photo
http://c7.alamy.com/comp/C46BEH/second- ... C46BEH.jpg
Emmanuel
Re: 3.7cm Flak 43
Hi all,
I am not sure: 3.7cm Flakzwilling 43 ??
Image from Ebay
Sturm78
I am not sure: 3.7cm Flakzwilling 43 ??
Image from Ebay
Sturm78
Re: 3.7cm Flak 43
A 3.7 cm Flak 43 on concrete pivot at a Flakturm , picture is from Ebay .
Regards Jos
Regards Jos
Re: 3.7cm Flak 43
Hi all,
Two images from https://samlinger.natmus.dk/assetbrowse ... 3%A6stning
I think probably these images were taken after surrender of Germany in 1945...
Sturm78
Two images from https://samlinger.natmus.dk/assetbrowse ... 3%A6stning
I think probably these images were taken after surrender of Germany in 1945...
Sturm78
-
- Member
- Posts: 574
- Joined: 20 Jan 2019, 11:14
- Location: Australia
Re: 3.7cm Flak 43
How did this weapon compare to the 40mm bofors? Superior? Inferior?
Re: 3.7cm Flak 43
Superior in ease of production and rate of fire.ThatZenoGuy wrote: ↑03 Jun 2021, 16:01How did this weapon compare to the 40mm bofors? Superior? Inferior?
Inferior in muzzle velocity and shell weight/impact.
-
- Member
- Posts: 574
- Joined: 20 Jan 2019, 11:14
- Location: Australia