Bauformen
Re: Bauformen
Hello Friends
(1) Do you five of these tobruks ?
(2) A "normal" 2 cm Flak 30 or 38 does not fit in the tobruk
(3) Any of these tobruks left
(4) Sorry for the many questions
Regards Jos
(1) Do you five of these tobruks ?
(2) A "normal" 2 cm Flak 30 or 38 does not fit in the tobruk
(3) Any of these tobruks left
(4) Sorry for the many questions
Regards Jos
- der bunkermann
- Member
- Posts: 1591
- Joined: 18 May 2006, 17:27
- Location: stp. gr. scheveningen holland
- Contact:
Re: Bauformen
Hi jos.
1 i'm not sure if they were all the same.
2 Strange a normal 2 cm dont fit?
3 18 and 19 still excist, but the bettungen are completely covered.
4 my finger hurts
1 i'm not sure if they were all the same.
2 Strange a normal 2 cm dont fit?
3 18 and 19 still excist, but the bettungen are completely covered.
4 my finger hurts
Re: Bauformen
Moin,
I think only No. 20 and maybe 21 are from this design...
all the other one had a seperat UK & M.
sadly No. 20 is demolished.
btw. what are BRV R1, R2 and R3?
greetz
Alex
I think only No. 20 and maybe 21 are from this design...
all the other one had a seperat UK & M.
sadly No. 20 is demolished.
btw. what are BRV R1, R2 and R3?
greetz
Alex
Re: Bauformen
Hello,jopaerya wrote: (2) A "normal" 2 cm Flak 30 or 38 does not fit in the tobruk
Regards Jos
the opening Looks bigger than a Bf 261 (70)... if the drawing are right is the Diameter 6,60m
My opinion is that the le Flak are for "Erdkampf" because it was infront of the Höckerline/Pz-Graben.
greetz
Alex
- der bunkermann
- Member
- Posts: 1591
- Joined: 18 May 2006, 17:27
- Location: stp. gr. scheveningen holland
- Contact:
Re: Bauformen
Hi alex, R2 is possible something to do with the cables that connected the complex with the V192 in westbroekpark.
R3 is a tobruk. I think it was 58c.
Gr. Tim.
R1 is not on the map?
R3 is a tobruk. I think it was 58c.
Gr. Tim.
R1 is not on the map?
Re: Bauformen
Hello Tim,
thx... I wonder that the Tobruk isn´t on the german map?!
R1 was is the KSS at Willem Beukelzoonstraat.
greetz
Alex
thx... I wonder that the Tobruk isn´t on the german map?!
R1 was is the KSS at Willem Beukelzoonstraat.
greetz
Alex
- der bunkermann
- Member
- Posts: 1591
- Joined: 18 May 2006, 17:27
- Location: stp. gr. scheveningen holland
- Contact:
Re: Bauformen
Aha.. i have a drawing of the schaltstelle somewhere. Send it to you.
I remember that tobruk was temporarily open some years ago.
I remember that tobruk was temporarily open some years ago.
- der bunkermann
- Member
- Posts: 1591
- Joined: 18 May 2006, 17:27
- Location: stp. gr. scheveningen holland
- Contact:
Re: Bauformen
Also where the lonely 4 is on the map (below r2) there should be a tobruk.
Re: Bauformen
Hello,
Here is a good hint to find "who" is the BF 85. It must be an observation post with workroom.
Regards
Here is a good hint to find "who" is the BF 85. It must be an observation post with workroom.
Regards
Re: Bauformen
Nice find Arthur
- dirk Peeters
- Member
- Posts: 6568
- Joined: 24 May 2011, 21:18
- Location: Heist op den Berg Belgium
Re: Bauformen
Yep i agree , nice find
Dirk
Dirk
-
- Member
- Posts: 855
- Joined: 19 Dec 2010, 23:07
Re: Bauformen
Almost typical Ringstand 58c, but only partially (on top = beam section) with iron reinforcement.
Please note on drawing label, both names existing together Ringstand and Tobrukstand.
Also new function/armament = Panzerbüchse and observer.
Source: http://www.gahetna.nl/collectie/archief ... level/file
Please note on drawing label, both names existing together Ringstand and Tobrukstand.
Also new function/armament = Panzerbüchse and observer.
Source: http://www.gahetna.nl/collectie/archief ... level/file
-
- Member
- Posts: 855
- Joined: 19 Dec 2010, 23:07
Re: Bauformen
MG-Stand Typ 5 from designed im year 1943.
Quite deep inside 130 cm from floor to top edge with big diameter of wooden pole in the middle. AA purpose for hmg or light cannon?
Some source as above.
Quite deep inside 130 cm from floor to top edge with big diameter of wooden pole in the middle. AA purpose for hmg or light cannon?
Some source as above.
-
- Member
- Posts: 402
- Joined: 16 Apr 2006, 10:02
- Location: Denmark
Re: Bauformen
Thanks forttravel
In Denmark (and other placed, I guess), lots of Bauformen were built without rebar in the external walls. To ensure, that the strength of the wall would not be reduced, the thickness of the walls was increased by 50 % (60 cm instead of 40 cm as usual). Nevertheless, today these walls often have got large cracks or sometimes even collapse under their own weight (see attached photo of Bauform 67 variant at Blåvand). The bottom plate and roof plate were usually built in normal thickness and reinforcement (20 cm and 40 cm respectively).
The Bauform 58c on your drawing seems to be built without reinforcement in the bottom plate and only a minimum in the roof plate. Thicknesses are increased by 50 % (30 cm and 60 cm respectively), and the stair case has got an extra step. I wonder if any Ringstände were actually built in this way.
Greetings Lars
Very interesting drawing. It seems to be a Bauform 58c build using the minimal amount of reinforcing bars.Almost typical Ringstand 58c, but only partially (on top = beam section) with iron reinforcement.
In Denmark (and other placed, I guess), lots of Bauformen were built without rebar in the external walls. To ensure, that the strength of the wall would not be reduced, the thickness of the walls was increased by 50 % (60 cm instead of 40 cm as usual). Nevertheless, today these walls often have got large cracks or sometimes even collapse under their own weight (see attached photo of Bauform 67 variant at Blåvand). The bottom plate and roof plate were usually built in normal thickness and reinforcement (20 cm and 40 cm respectively).
The Bauform 58c on your drawing seems to be built without reinforcement in the bottom plate and only a minimum in the roof plate. Thicknesses are increased by 50 % (30 cm and 60 cm respectively), and the stair case has got an extra step. I wonder if any Ringstände were actually built in this way.
Greetings Lars
- Attachments
-
- 1.JPG (112.33 KiB) Viewed 4122 times
-
- 2.JPG (98.24 KiB) Viewed 4122 times