Regelbau 673
Regelbau 673
Hello All
From the National Archief a drawing of the Regelbau 673 , so far known 2 x in Denmark ( Grove ) , '
three in Holland and one in St Nazaire . Nice to the tobruk and the extra reinforced walls ( 3 meter ) .
Regards Jos
From the National Archief a drawing of the Regelbau 673 , so far known 2 x in Denmark ( Grove ) , '
three in Holland and one in St Nazaire . Nice to the tobruk and the extra reinforced walls ( 3 meter ) .
Regards Jos
Re: Regelbau 673
hi jos,
nice shéma !! the 672 of treguennec seems to have been build in the same configuration as your 673.
672 + tobruk ...
you see the tobruk whit the nische similair 668 !!
nice shéma !! the 672 of treguennec seems to have been build in the same configuration as your 673.
672 + tobruk ...
you see the tobruk whit the nische similair 668 !!
Re: Regelbau 673
Hi Jos,
Thanks for sharing. What a weirdo. Noteworthy are the different thickness of the sidewalls and the complex entrance.
bregds
SES
Thanks for sharing. What a weirdo. Noteworthy are the different thickness of the sidewalls and the complex entrance.
bregds
SES
- der bunkermann
- Member
- Posts: 1591
- Joined: 18 May 2006, 17:27
- Location: stp. gr. scheveningen holland
- Contact:
Re: Regelbau 673
Hi SES,
the 3 meter is on the seaside..
here a nice picture:
edit: in the far rear you can see another 673!
gr, Tim
the 3 meter is on the seaside..
here a nice picture:
edit: in the far rear you can see another 673!
gr, Tim
Re: Regelbau 673
Hi Tim,
That makes sense.
Thanks for the picture, this 673 is so different from the ones at Grove.
bregds
SES
That makes sense.
Thanks for the picture, this 673 is so different from the ones at Grove.
bregds
SES
Re: Regelbau 673
Forgive me my ignorance: what was the purpose of the bunker and why the strange entrance part (high small slit on the right side) ?
Thanks,
Wim
www.petromax.nl
3D : http://www.petromax.nl/Hanstholm.html
http://www.petromax.nl/DeBeer.html
Wim
www.petromax.nl
3D : http://www.petromax.nl/Hanstholm.html
http://www.petromax.nl/DeBeer.html
Re: Regelbau 673
hello winve
for the two guns and the slot is for a double steel door.
for the two guns and the slot is for a double steel door.
Re: Regelbau 673
Thanks but these would not be normal doors that hinged at the wall ?moonraker wrote:hello winve
for the two guns and the slot is for a double steel door.
The slid at the right suggest a sliding door but why not at the left side ? Also the height is higher then the actual height of the shelter room.
Thanks,
Wim
www.petromax.nl
3D : http://www.petromax.nl/Hanstholm.html
http://www.petromax.nl/DeBeer.html
Wim
www.petromax.nl
3D : http://www.petromax.nl/Hanstholm.html
http://www.petromax.nl/DeBeer.html
- dirk Peeters
- Member
- Posts: 6568
- Joined: 24 May 2011, 21:18
- Location: Heist op den Berg Belgium
Re: Regelbau 673
very wierd construction a t Grove
you could nt even place one canon inside ...
you could nt even place one canon inside ...
Re: Regelbau 673
Hello Dirk
If I am correct the 673 bunkers at Grove were used to house light flak .
Regards Jos
If I am correct the 673 bunkers at Grove were used to house light flak .
Regards Jos
Re: Regelbau 673
Hi Jos,
We are not sure about that. The two 673s are located in in same areas as a Flak-Zug, and in the two areas there are bunkers normally associated with a Flak-Stellung. But in both areas there are also two 668 and according to the BfM there were three unspecified 2 cm PAK at Grove. The ramps from the 673 indicates, that the guns housed in the bunker should be towed to firing positions facing the runway area. At present it is my foggy theory that the PAK was housed in the 673 and the 668 were for the crews.
bregds
SES
We are not sure about that. The two 673s are located in in same areas as a Flak-Zug, and in the two areas there are bunkers normally associated with a Flak-Stellung. But in both areas there are also two 668 and according to the BfM there were three unspecified 2 cm PAK at Grove. The ramps from the 673 indicates, that the guns housed in the bunker should be towed to firing positions facing the runway area. At present it is my foggy theory that the PAK was housed in the 673 and the 668 were for the crews.
bregds
SES
Re: Regelbau 673
Hello SES
Do you know what type of PAK should be housed in the 673 .
Regards Jos
P.S. The one's at Grove do they have the slit for the doors or not ?
Do you know what type of PAK should be housed in the 673 .
Regards Jos
P.S. The one's at Grove do they have the slit for the doors or not ?
Re: Regelbau 673
Hi Jos,
The BfM does only specify 2 cm K30, which could mean KwK 30, but I don't know if this existed on a field carriage.
There are swing doors and no slit.
bregds
SES
The BfM does only specify 2 cm K30, which could mean KwK 30, but I don't know if this existed on a field carriage.
There are swing doors and no slit.
bregds
SES
Re: Regelbau 673
Hi guys
Very nice picture Tim and thanks for the drawing Jos. Interesting design deviation! What about the last one in NL and the one in Saint Nazaire, do they look like the "Standard" design or do they have special features as well??
By the way. The ones a Grove have rounded corners to the actual garage, making access easier than the drawing states.
Brgds Tønnes
Very nice picture Tim and thanks for the drawing Jos. Interesting design deviation! What about the last one in NL and the one in Saint Nazaire, do they look like the "Standard" design or do they have special features as well??
By the way. The ones a Grove have rounded corners to the actual garage, making access easier than the drawing states.
Brgds Tønnes