AT obstacles

Discussions on the fortifications, artillery, & rockets used by the Axis forces.
Sturm78
Member
Posts: 17465
Joined: 02 Oct 2008 17:18
Location: Spain

Re: AT obstacles

Post by Sturm78 » 09 Jul 2013 09:23

Hi all,

Dragon teeth. I think Westwall

Image from EBay
Sturm78
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

sebas379
Member
Posts: 46
Joined: 23 Jun 2012 15:36
Location: Netherlands

Re: AT obstacles

Post by sebas379 » 11 Jul 2013 00:07

Nice view of the surroundings of that line of dragon teeth. I presume the defenders' positions were to the right of the map and maybe on the hill in the background? Would provide excellent spots for covering the water and preventing the enemy from crossing it.

ChristopherPerrien
Member
Posts: 7051
Joined: 26 Dec 2002 00:58
Location: Mississippi

Re: AT obstacles

Post by ChristopherPerrien » 11 Jul 2013 18:37

The stream behind it already makes that area an effective anti tank obstacle. Adding dragon's teeth only makes the area known as having active defense.

Hence the real weakness of such extremely resource consuming fortified/obstacle lines. It "gives away" where to look for defensive forces and therefore allows to plan in advance to defeat them.

Deception is the most important factor in war. To paraphrase Sun Tzu and alot of other great generals.

Better if they had placed "czech hedge-hogs" in front of that stream. :lol:
Last edited by ChristopherPerrien on 12 Jul 2013 06:16, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
AvB
Member
Posts: 3376
Joined: 20 Jun 2004 00:00
Location: Utrecht, Netherlands

Re: AT obstacles

Post by AvB » 11 Jul 2013 19:46

But the Germans made these obstacles for kilometers on end. So hard to get around them. The stream is probably easy to tacle by armoured vehicles.

ChristopherPerrien
Member
Posts: 7051
Joined: 26 Dec 2002 00:58
Location: Mississippi

Re: AT obstacles

Post by ChristopherPerrien » 12 Jul 2013 06:36

Right they did. And the fact that they could be negated by a few loads of dirt/rock and boards, was very illuminating. Farmers, even before the war, in many countries did this to "dragon's teeth lines to reach their fields, much to the irritation of the "army" , no doubt. The farmer trick was later used by many armed forces to cross dragon's teeth in the war.

There is no need to go "around" them, when going over them can be done by this method , quite quickly. The hardest part is neutralizing all defensive positions to create a " blind spot", once that is done , possibly miles of dragon's teeth are rendered "moot/useless".

As to the "stream". depends on the depth and how hard the stream bed is, on how effective it would be as an obstacle. It would have to be reconn-ed first before crossing. As a tanker it would worry me more than the teeth. Plus with a stream like that , there is a good chance the "farmland/pasture" behind it might be "saturated/soft-ground". A soft stream bed and soft ground near it , can make an area totally un-passable to tanks. I have seen 20-30 tanks stuck in a field like that. This why it is important to look hard at them little blue lines on the map, and physically recon them before you go sending tanks to maneuver/fight through such areas.

Chris

sebas379
Member
Posts: 46
Joined: 23 Jun 2012 15:36
Location: Netherlands

Re: AT obstacles

Post by sebas379 » 26 Sep 2013 13:56

Just remembered the thread, holiday and school does that to you:)

Wouldn't the obstacles be primarily used to "tunnel" an attack into "killing zones" much like WW1 barbed wire? the enemy had only a few routes through the barbed wire and machineguns would be pre-aimed at those zones. I can imagine a similar strategy with AT obstacles and anti-tank guns be very effective, especially if you conceal the guns well. The stream just adds difficulty to the attackers moving against the positions and since it's already there, why not use it in your defence. A stream can be bridged anywhere, provided you have bridging equipment on hand, but it seems to be doable. Adding more obstacles would in my mind just add time lost for the attackers. The more time they lose getting through, the more time you have to organise a counter-attack or other measures.

sebas379
Member
Posts: 46
Joined: 23 Jun 2012 15:36
Location: Netherlands

Re: AT obstacles

Post by sebas379 » 27 Oct 2013 16:30


User avatar
kstdk
Member
Posts: 5310
Joined: 10 Jan 2004 16:59
Location: Denmark

Re: AT obstacles

Post by kstdk » 27 Oct 2013 17:36

Hello

Nice :)

Regards
Kurt
kstdk

User avatar
der bunkermann
Financial supporter
Posts: 1589
Joined: 18 May 2006 16:27
Location: stp. gr. scheveningen holland

Re: AT obstacles

Post by der bunkermann » 27 Oct 2013 18:26

Wow cool!

Sturm78
Member
Posts: 17465
Joined: 02 Oct 2008 17:18
Location: Spain

Re: AT obstacles

Post by Sturm78 » 07 Nov 2013 21:13

Hi all,

Cointet-element, also known as Belgian Gate :

Image from EBay
Sturm78
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

daveh
Member
Posts: 1439
Joined: 11 Feb 2003 18:14
Location: uk

Re: AT obstacles

Post by daveh » 08 Nov 2013 22:15

Belgian AT obstacles

see http://www.kwlinie.be/

1) Cointet elements
T III-2-50 (2).jpg
Caption

1. Front rollers
2. Rear roller (directional)
3. Half hinge
4. Consolidation
5, 6, 7. Rings for mutual attachment
8. Tow hooks

These elements could be linked together to form a long barrier as shown below.
image032.jpeg
The great anti-tank barrier of the Gembloux gap. This picture was taken in the vicinity of Mont St.Guibert, a small town south of Wavre. Note the zigzags in the line. Army doctrine required automatic weapons to be placed in the inner angles

or to block roads by being fixed to concrete bollards.
Untitled.png

2) Rail barriers
image044.jpeg
The transition between Cointet gates and a rail field. The Cointet elements have been placed on a road linked to an off road concrete bollard by steel wire.

The rail barriers were placed in a straight line. Typically in 5 rows set 1 to 2 metres into the ground rising to varying heights up to a metre above ground.

3) Tetrahedrons
Untitled.jpg
There was a light type that weighed about 190 kg and a heavy type that almost weighed 500 kg and was filled with concrete.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Sturm78
Member
Posts: 17465
Joined: 02 Oct 2008 17:18
Location: Spain

Re: AT obstacles

Post by Sturm78 » 27 Nov 2013 11:05

Hi all,

Another image (from Ebay) of Czech hedgehogs:

Sturm78
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Sturm78
Member
Posts: 17465
Joined: 02 Oct 2008 17:18
Location: Spain

Re: AT obstacles

Post by Sturm78 » 04 Dec 2013 11:49

Hi all,

Dragon teeths from Westwall (I think):

Image from EBay
Sturm78
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Sturm78
Member
Posts: 17465
Joined: 02 Oct 2008 17:18
Location: Spain

Re: AT obstacles

Post by Sturm78 » 06 Dec 2013 12:16

Hi all,

More czech hedgehogs:

Image from EBay
Sturm78
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Sturm78
Member
Posts: 17465
Joined: 02 Oct 2008 17:18
Location: Spain

Re: AT obstacles

Post by Sturm78 » 09 Dec 2013 19:09

Hi all,

I think french AT obstacles:

Image from EBay
Sturm78
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Return to “Fortifications, Artillery, & Rockets”