Number of R639
-
- Member
- Posts: 244
- Joined: 16 Nov 2011, 20:55
- Location: France
- Contact:
- dirk Peeters
- Member
- Posts: 6568
- Joined: 24 May 2011, 21:18
- Location: Heist op den Berg Belgium
Re: Number of R639
not bad at all
Re: Number of R639
Great drawing Erwan
Could be a option , a other option is that the groundwater level was so high
that the "Hoelschergrube" was located at ground level and not in a pit ??
Regards Jos
Could be a option , a other option is that the groundwater level was so high
that the "Hoelschergrube" was located at ground level and not in a pit ??
Regards Jos
- dirk Peeters
- Member
- Posts: 6568
- Joined: 24 May 2011, 21:18
- Location: Heist op den Berg Belgium
Re: Number of R639
thought of that also
but why does a Hoelscher anlage needs a Chimney ?
and on the rear picture we see clearly a normal chimney
n the other hand
if it is a generator where are the air entrances ?
but why does a Hoelscher anlage needs a Chimney ?
and on the rear picture we see clearly a normal chimney
n the other hand
if it is a generator where are the air entrances ?
- dirk Peeters
- Member
- Posts: 6568
- Joined: 24 May 2011, 21:18
- Location: Heist op den Berg Belgium
-
- Member
- Posts: 244
- Joined: 16 Nov 2011, 20:55
- Location: France
- Contact:
Re: Number of R639
Air entrance for the generator could be through the large door ?! ... not easy but possible ! So that we can consider that the large door hides the iron barrels for passage close and air pipes ...
Best regards
Best regards
Re: Number of R639
hi,
i have a doubt for the trinkwasser,giving access to the interior. for me just the pipe water.the option for the reason water from the garonne looks the best.
Me belfra-team
i have a doubt for the trinkwasser,giving access to the interior. for me just the pipe water.the option for the reason water from the garonne looks the best.
Me belfra-team
-
- Member
- Posts: 244
- Joined: 16 Nov 2011, 20:55
- Location: France
- Contact:
Re: Number of R639
Hello everybody !
Thank you for your messages !
The access to the watertank from inside is already a solution in a bunker near Bordeaux ! It is a 621 (Ar34a/03) ...
When you suppress the tobrouk on the left side of 639, the wall becomes very thin ! So that a passage is an option ? If not you have to increase the thickness up to 1 meter or more.
On the other side of the bunker we have a lot of space to fill ! The option of install the heater in this part is very interessant but can't fill the entire part of the right side of the bunker ...
I found a clue in my archivs ... The french authorities asked themselves to preserve this bunker at the Libération because of an "important Z station" .. I think that the presence of numbers of boats in the harbour made that germans built an extra large unit anti-gas in this place !?
Do someone know about a similar building or anti gas unit (Z station) in others harbours ??
Best regards
Thank you for your messages !
The access to the watertank from inside is already a solution in a bunker near Bordeaux ! It is a 621 (Ar34a/03) ...
When you suppress the tobrouk on the left side of 639, the wall becomes very thin ! So that a passage is an option ? If not you have to increase the thickness up to 1 meter or more.
On the other side of the bunker we have a lot of space to fill ! The option of install the heater in this part is very interessant but can't fill the entire part of the right side of the bunker ...
I found a clue in my archivs ... The french authorities asked themselves to preserve this bunker at the Libération because of an "important Z station" .. I think that the presence of numbers of boats in the harbour made that germans built an extra large unit anti-gas in this place !?
Do someone know about a similar building or anti gas unit (Z station) in others harbours ??
Best regards
Re: Number of R639
Two remarks
(1) the two Wasserbehalter was placed together like on your 2 D drawing
(2) we are missing a room for fuel on the place were the "connection" is
(1) the two Wasserbehalter was placed together like on your 2 D drawing
(2) we are missing a room for fuel on the place were the "connection" is
-
- Member
- Posts: 244
- Joined: 16 Nov 2011, 20:55
- Location: France
- Contact:
Re: Number of R639
Ok ! I agree with you for the watertanks ! I saw that too ...
Concerning the "connection" between generator room and wasserbehalter room, what do u think about the thikness of the wall in this part ? My opinion was that they needed lot of water for the "Z unit" and installed the generator together with the Heater on the right side ? But that doesn't match with the pipes (chemney) above !
So the reel problem is the unpossible link between a wasserbunker and a 639 on the left side without adding more concrete between the two buildings ...
I didn't find any another bunker with this excroissance !
Best regards
Concerning the "connection" between generator room and wasserbehalter room, what do u think about the thikness of the wall in this part ? My opinion was that they needed lot of water for the "Z unit" and installed the generator together with the Heater on the right side ? But that doesn't match with the pipes (chemney) above !
So the reel problem is the unpossible link between a wasserbunker and a 639 on the left side without adding more concrete between the two buildings ...
I didn't find any another bunker with this excroissance !
Best regards
Re: Number of R639
My opinion is that the Wasserbehalter room is not connected to the 639 because you can enter the
bunker without any defense and I am missing a room for the fuel in your drawing .
The Wasserbehalter looks like the one at Gi 312 by the 622, also the Wasserbehalter bunker have
normally a walls and roofs from 1.00 till 1.50 . Maybe it's optical illusion but it looks that the door
to Wasserbehalter is higher then the entrances of the 639 . But I could be totally wrong .
bunker without any defense and I am missing a room for the fuel in your drawing .
The Wasserbehalter looks like the one at Gi 312 by the 622, also the Wasserbehalter bunker have
normally a walls and roofs from 1.00 till 1.50 . Maybe it's optical illusion but it looks that the door
to Wasserbehalter is higher then the entrances of the 639 . But I could be totally wrong .
- dirk Peeters
- Member
- Posts: 6568
- Joined: 24 May 2011, 21:18
- Location: Heist op den Berg Belgium
Re: Number of R639
for me that height is also different jos
so this can be different thicknesses
so this can be different thicknesses
Last edited by dirk Peeters on 14 Apr 2020, 15:11, edited 1 time in total.
- dirk Peeters
- Member
- Posts: 6568
- Joined: 24 May 2011, 21:18
- Location: Heist op den Berg Belgium
Re: Number of R639
another thing
how thick are the walls and the roof for the 639 ?
your opinions please
how thick are the walls and the roof for the 639 ?
your opinions please
- dirk Peeters
- Member
- Posts: 6568
- Joined: 24 May 2011, 21:18
- Location: Heist op den Berg Belgium
Re: Number of R639
the 622 at Gi 312 ??
this ?????
this ?????
Re: Number of R639
Yes this one that has also a double "Wassertank" , maybe the walls are bigger in Bordeaux .