Berlin flak towers

Discussions on the fortifications, artillery, & rockets used by the Axis forces.
Post Reply
User avatar
Kim Sung
Member
Posts: 5039
Joined: 28 May 2005, 14:36
Location: The Last Confucian State

#31

Post by Kim Sung » 25 Oct 2005, 17:02

Flakturms at the west end of Tiergarten. These six-storied buildings could accomodate 8 thousand people(according to a report, 30 thousand people seeked their haven in one of these Flakturms during an allied air raid)

Photographed on January 22, 1941
Attachments
FLAK Towers.jpg
FLAK Towers.jpg (42.97 KiB) Viewed 3367 times

jopaerya
Member
Posts: 19238
Joined: 21 Jun 2004, 14:21
Location: middelburg

#32

Post by jopaerya » 25 Oct 2005, 17:24

Hi Killchola

Are you sure about the date of the very nice photo.
The start of the building of the Flakturm at Tiergarten
was in Oktober 1940 and took 6 months when it was ready
in March 1941. ( Flaktürme from H. Sakkers )
Also the Würzburg Reise on the Leitturm was placed in the
spring of 1941 ( Die Deutschen Funkmessverfahren der Deutschen
Luftwaffe from F.Trenkle ), so I thinks the photo is taken later than
22 jan. 1941.

Regards Jos


User avatar
SES
In memoriam
Posts: 3936
Joined: 26 Jan 2004, 10:07
Location: 05 ON LT 8
Contact:

#33

Post by SES » 25 Oct 2005, 21:10

Hi Jos,
I was about to make the same comment based on the W-R.
:-)
SES

User avatar
medieval dudes
Member
Posts: 361
Joined: 10 Feb 2005, 14:50
Location: Ottawa, Canada

More disadvantages then advantages

#34

Post by medieval dudes » 26 Oct 2005, 21:38

Hello flack operators

Well I have ask this: of what use where these towers in the end:

-They cost a large amount of ressources to produce
-They were standing high and therefor where "easier targets" for low flying bombers
-They were extremely large and were easy to see from the air
-One good aim from a bomber at it could destroy a bunch of its guns (since they were so close together)

I just have to ask why the Germans were not more interested in having multiple small AA positions instead of having these massive structures?

I really think the picture on the thread are nice to look at. Thanks for sharing guys

Greg :D

User avatar
kstdk
Member
Posts: 5446
Joined: 10 Jan 2004, 17:59
Location: Denmark
Contact:

#35

Post by kstdk » 26 Oct 2005, 22:30

Hello Greg

It seems that all though the massive bombings of Berlin, Hanburg and Vienna - none of the towers were ever seriously hit and damaged !!!

You have to realize, that at night ( the bombraids were mostly at night ) it would not be easy to spot them, allthough they were known to the allied airforce, and the flak were also very intence in these particular areas.

The Berlin towers were more damaged by soviet artillery in april may 45 than they were by bombing and attack from the air. The flakunits were, beside the flaktowers, very massive represented in other flakpositions around and in the cities, so they had a lot of other "flak" present also !!

But aside from that, your points are very right, and there were planned more towers in other cities, but they were never realized, so the germans had also made a "cost - benefit" calculation - and decided to cancel them.

Regards
Kurt
kstdk.

ducatim901
Member
Posts: 1051
Joined: 14 Jul 2005, 16:38
Location: netherlands

#36

Post by ducatim901 » 26 Oct 2005, 23:11

I agree totally, Kurt.
Greetings Jack Koorneef

User avatar
Dora
Member
Posts: 451
Joined: 19 Aug 2002, 17:36
Location: Hanover, Pennsylvania

#37

Post by Dora » 27 Oct 2005, 19:07

All,
An excellent discussion on the flakturm everyone.

What I also found interesting in Foedrowitz's book was the great difficulty the Allies had in destroying these massive structures.
Dora

PJF
Member
Posts: 146
Joined: 23 Aug 2004, 20:17
Location: Chicago, USA

#38

Post by PJF » 27 Oct 2005, 20:07

IIRC the Humboldthain G-turm - along with the relatively deep RR cut - was an anchor point of the inner defense ring during the battle of Berlin. The surviving north face of the tower still bears the marks of numerous 20.3 cm and 15.2 cm hits. My photos are not the best but you can make out some of the exisitng damage.

Also there are remnants of the L-turm on the south side of the park right across the street from the former AEG werke.
Attachments
artdamage1.jpg
artdamage1.jpg (130.63 KiB) Viewed 3232 times

User avatar
medieval dudes
Member
Posts: 361
Joined: 10 Feb 2005, 14:50
Location: Ottawa, Canada

#39

Post by medieval dudes » 27 Oct 2005, 22:46

kstdk wrote:Hello Greg

It seems that all though the massive bombings of Berlin, Hanburg and Vienna - none of the towers were ever seriously hit and damaged !!!

You have to realize, that at night ( the bombraids were mostly at night ) it would not be easy to spot them, allthough they were known to the allied airforce, and the flak were also very intence in these particular areas.

The Berlin towers were more damaged by soviet artillery in april may 45 than they were by bombing and attack from the air. The flakunits were, beside the flaktowers, very massive represented in other flakpositions around and in the cities, so they had a lot of other "flak" present also !!

But aside from that, your points are very right, and there were planned more towers in other cities, but they were never realized, so the germans had also made a "cost - benefit" calculation - and decided to cancel them.

Regards
Kurt
kstdk.
Thanks for the answer Kurt :wink: .

Yep I understand your point what intriges me now is that you mentioned that the Allies knew about the towers. And earlier on it was indicated that some (even though their capacity was 8000) were filled with 30 000 people. If we add all this info together as an Ally bomber that wants to demoralize the population with terror and death I would simply just pound as much as I can the towers. 30 000 people killed in a go. Well to me these towers seem so dam dangerous. An accumulation of people in one small area... could have been a disaster. Good thing nothing happened.

Also I know this is off topic to a certain extent but I am intriged with some of the pictures I see... The 128 mm Zwilling I had no idea it was acutally produced. When where they placed on the towers and does anyone know how many were produced in total???? Thanks again in advance :D :D

Gregory :)

User avatar
Erik E
Member
Posts: 4517
Joined: 11 Mar 2002, 23:26
Location: Stavanger, Norway
Contact:

#40

Post by Erik E » 27 Oct 2005, 23:41

When where they placed on the towers and does anyone know how many were produced in total????
The first twin gun was installed in Berlin in 1942, at the end of the war 34 guns had been mounted in Flak towers.
Production of sinmgle barreled guns must have been higher, but I haven`t heard any numbers for those.....

EE

User avatar
medieval dudes
Member
Posts: 361
Joined: 10 Feb 2005, 14:50
Location: Ottawa, Canada

450 or more

#41

Post by medieval dudes » 28 Oct 2005, 11:16

Erik E wrote:
When where they placed on the towers and does anyone know how many were produced in total????
The first twin gun was installed in Berlin in 1942, at the end of the war 34 guns had been mounted in Flak towers.
Production of sinmgle barreled guns must have been higher, but I haven`t heard any numbers for those.....

EE
Good morning comrades

Thanks Eric. 34 is a good number for such heavy machines 8). I discovered that the single barreled production reached more then 450 machines. Also that the first guns to shoot at Russian troops as they attacked and entered the city were the Flack guns of the towers. So that is confirmed now.

Source: http://users.belgacom.net/artillery/art ... tml#232141

Also, the picture you posted PJF... impressive to see that the damage done does not seem to be so great for such large callibers of artillery guns (you mentioned 20,3 cm guns). The structure must have been quite resistant.

Gregory :D

jopaerya
Member
Posts: 19238
Joined: 21 Jun 2004, 14:21
Location: middelburg

#42

Post by jopaerya » 28 Oct 2005, 18:18

Hi All

I don't know the source of the internetsite , but mostly they
used total list of the Luftwaffeguns 12,8 cm double and single ,
The Kriegsmarine also used 12,8 cm double and single .

Regards Jos

User avatar
K-9
Member
Posts: 480
Joined: 24 Sep 2003, 18:40
Location: Romania

#43

Post by K-9 » 30 Oct 2005, 19:55

I've searched the net for any more informations about the Flak Towers, and all I came up were pictures. As an student-architect, I would be interested to see some blueprints of them, floorplans, sections and so on... Does anyone have such blueprints? . Thanks.

jopaerya
Member
Posts: 19238
Joined: 21 Jun 2004, 14:21
Location: middelburg

#44

Post by jopaerya » 30 Oct 2005, 20:21

Hello K-9

If you buy the book Flaktürme St/15 ISBN 90-76396-01-9 ,
there are 6 plans of each level of the Flakturm in Hamburg
Heiligengeistfeld on a scale of 1:175 .
Map = 3th level H.Q. 3th Flakdivision

Regards Jos

User avatar
SES
In memoriam
Posts: 3936
Joined: 26 Jan 2004, 10:07
Location: 05 ON LT 8
Contact:

#45

Post by SES » 30 Oct 2005, 20:23

K-9 wrote:I've searched the net for any more informations about the Flak Towers, and all I came up were pictures. As an student-architect, I would be interested to see some blueprints of them, floorplans, sections and so on... Does anyone have such blueprints? . Thanks.
Try this:
http://www.google.dk/search?hl=da&q=Fla ... %B8g&meta=
bregds
SES

Post Reply

Return to “Fortifications, Artillery, & Rockets”